Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Bhavani Raskutti

dblp:89/5867 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
22ranked-venue papers
12as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 15 · 8 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 6 · 3 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 3 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-authorComputer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
5 papers
Data mining · 83% Recommender systems · 16% Information retrieval · 2%
Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Learning theory · 26% Optimization for machine learning · 26% Information extraction and text analysis · 20%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining
clustering
0.132002
Using Unlabelled Data for Text Classification through Addition of Cluster Parameters · ICML 2002
An Evaluation of Criteria for Measuring the Quality of Clusters · IJCAI 1999
Combining clustering and co-training to enhance text classification using unlabelled data · KDD 2002
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification
imbalanced classification
0.112005
Predicting the product purchase patterns of corporate customers · KDD 2005
Recommender systems › conversion rate prediction
purchase prediction
0.112005
Predicting the product purchase patterns of corporate customers · KDD 2005
Machine learning › Learning theory › ranking
AUC optimization
0.012004
Optimising area under the ROC curve using gradient descent · ICML 2004
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning
0.012002
Using Unlabelled Data for Text Classification through Addition of Cluster Parameters · ICML 2002
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text classification
0.012002
Using Unlabelled Data for Text Classification through Addition of Cluster Parameters · ICML 2002
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification
clustering-based classification
0.012002
Using Unlabelled Data for Text Classification through Addition of Cluster Parameters · ICML 2002
Data mining › semi-supervised learning
co-training
0.012002
Combining clustering and co-training to enhance text classification using unlabelled data · KDD 2002
Data mining
semi-supervised learning
0.012002
Combining clustering and co-training to enhance text classification using unlabelled data · KDD 2002
Data mining › text mining
text classification
0.012002
Combining clustering and co-training to enhance text classification using unlabelled data · KDD 2002
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › task-oriented dialogue
information-seeking dialogue
0.011997
Generating queries and replies during information-seeking interactions · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 1997
Information retrieval
interactive information retrieval
0.011997
Generating queries and replies during information-seeking interactions · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

cluster parameters · 0.1value weighting · 0.1time interleaving · 0.1ranking · 0.1gradient descent · 0.0differentiable approximation · 0.0support vector machine · 0.0co-training · 0.0clustering · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Area Under ROC Optimisation using a Ramp Approximation
abstract
This paper introduces AURORA, an algorithm that builds binary classifiers to optimise the area under the ROC curve (the AUC). AURORA builds non-linear classifiers of the data by binarising the raw input features. Feature selection is performed using a fast heuristic routine, and gradient descent is used to optimise the coefficients of the selected features. Both feature selection and gradient descent are designed to be optimal for AUC. Non-differentiability of the objective function is overcome using a ramp-based approximation for the AUC. The use of this ramp-based approximation also allows the AUC to be calculated in near O(n) time, where n is the number of labelled observations available. The entire AURORA algorithm then also has computational complexity near O(n). AURORA is compared with several other classifiers, over eight binary classification tasks, and generally produces classifiers which are significantly more accurate. AURORA is also highly scalable with increasing number of training examples, and increasing number of input features.
Alan Herschtal, Bhavani Raskutti, Peter K. Campbell
SDM2
2005 Predicting the product purchase patterns of corporate customers
abstract
This paper describes TIPPPS (Time Interleaved Product Purchase Prediction System), which analyses billing data of corporate customers in a large telecommunications company in order to predict high value upsell opportunities. The challenges presented by this prediction problem are significant. Firstly, the diversity of products used by corporate telecommunications customers is huge. This, coupled with low product take-up rates, makes this a problem of learning from a very high dimensional feature space with very few minority examples. Further, it is important to give priority specifically to the identification of those new customers who are of high value. These challenges are overcome by introducing a number of modifications to standard data pre-processing and machine learning algorithms, the most important of which are time-interleaving of data and value weighting. Time interleaving is the concatenation of examples from multiple time periods, thus increasing the number of training examples, and hence the number of minority examples. Value weighting assigns importance to minority examples in proportion to the dollar value of take-up, thus biasing the system to identify high value customers. These modifications create a novel algorithm that makes the prediction system practical and usable.Comparison with other techniques designed for similar problems shows that the expected average improvement in ranking accuracy achieved using these modifications is 3.7%. TIPPPS has been in operation for several months and has been successful in identifying many upsell opportunities that were not identified by using the previous manual system.
Bhavani Raskutti, Alan Herschtal
KDD1
2004 Optimising area under the ROC curve using gradient descent
abstract
This paper introduces RankOpt, a linear binary classifier which optimises the area under the ROC curve (the AUC). Unlike standard binary classifiers, RankOpt adopts the AUC statistic as its objective function, and optimises it directly using gradient descent. The problems with using the AUC statistic as an objective function are that it is non-differentiable, and of complexity O(n2) in the number of data observations. RankOpt uses a differentiable approximation to the AUC which is accurate, and computationally efficient, being of complexity O(n.) This enables the gradient descent to be performed in reasonable time. The performance of RankOpt is compared with a number of other linear binary classifiers, over a number of different classification problems. In almost all cases it is found that the performance of RankOpt is significantly better than the other classifiers tested.
Alan Herschtal, Bhavani Raskutti
ICML2
2004 Exploring Potential of Leave-One-Out Estimator for Calibration of SVM in Text Mining
Adam Kowalczyk, Bhavani Raskutti, Herman L. Ferrá
PAKDD2
2003 Query Expansion and Query Reduction in Document Retrieval
abstract
We investigate two seemingly incompatible approaches for improving document retrieval performance in the context of question answering: query expansion and query reduction. Queries are expanded by generating lexical paraphrases. Syntactic, semantic and corpus-based frequency information is used in this process. Queries are reduced by removing words that may detract from retrieval performance. Features that identify these words were obtained from decision graphs. These approaches were evaluated using a subset of queries from TREC8, 9 and 10. Our evaluation shows that each approach in isolation improves retrieval performance, and both approaches together yield substantial improvements. Specifically, query expansion followed by reduction improved the average number of correct documents retrieved by 21.7% and the average number of queries that can be answered by 15%.
Ingrid Zukerman, Bhavani Raskutti, Yingying Wen
ICTAI2
2003 Exploring Fringe Settings of SVMs for Classification
Adam Kowalczyk, Bhavani Raskutti
PKDD2
2002 Lexical Query Paraphrasing for Document Retrieval
Ingrid Zukerman, Bhavani Raskutti
COLING2
2002 Using Unlabelled Data for Text Classification through Addition of Cluster Parameters
Bhavani Raskutti, Herman L. Ferrá, Adam Kowalczyk
ICML1
2002 Combining clustering and co-training to enhance text classification using unlabelled data
abstract
In this paper, we present a new co-training strategy that makes use of unlabelled data. It trains two predictors in parallel, with each predictor labelling the unlabelled data for training the other predictor in the next round. Both predictors are support vector machines, one trained using data from the original feature space, the other trained with new features that are derived by clustering both the labelled and unlabelled data. Hence, unlike standard co-training methods, our method does not require a priori the existence of two redundant views either of which can be used for classification, nor is it dependent on the availability of two different supervised learning algorithms that complement each other.We evaluated our method with two classifiers and three text benchmarks: WebKB, Reuters newswire articles and 20 NewsGroups. Our evaluation shows that our co-training technique improves text classification accuracy especially when the number of labelled examples are very few.
Bhavani Raskutti, Herman L. Ferrá, Adam Kowalczyk
KDD1
2001 Second Order Features for Maximising Text Classification Performance
Bhavani Raskutti, Herman L. Ferrá, Adam Kowalczyk
ECML1
1999 An Evaluation of Criteria for Measuring the Quality of Clusters
Bhavani Raskutti, Christopher Leckie
IJCAI1
1998 Extracting Phoneme Pronunciation Information from Corpora
Ian E. Thomas, Ingrid Zukerman, Bhavani Raskutti
CoNLL3
1998 Web Cache Focusing Devices
P. P. Sember, T. R. Mueller, N. Baker, M. C. Flower, Bhavani Raskutti, W. Wen
Comput. Networks5
1997 Lexical Access for Speech Understanding using Minimum Message Length Encoding
Ian E. Thomas, Ingrid Zukerman, Jonathan Oliver, David W. Albrecht, Bhavani Raskutti
UAI5
1997 Generating queries and replies during information-seeking interactions
Bhavani Raskutti, Ingrid Zukerman
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud.1
1997 A Feature-based Approach to Recommending Selections based on Past Preferences
Bhavani Raskutti, Anthony Beitz, Belinda Ward
User Model. User Adapt. Interact.1
1996 Acquiring User Preferences for Information Filtering in Interactive Multi-Media Services
Bhavani Raskutti, Anthony Beitz
PRICAI1
1996 A Unified Approach to Handling Uncertainty during Cooperative Consultations
Bhavani Raskutti, Ingrid Zukerman
PRICAI1
1996 Lexical Access using Minimum Message Length Encoding
Ian E. Thomas, Ingrid Zukerman, Jonathan Oliver, Bhavani Raskutti
PRICAI4
1994 Acquisition of Information to Determine a User's Plan
Bhavani Raskutti, Ingrid Zukerman
ECAI1
1991 Handling Uncertainty During Plan Recognition in Task-Oriented Consultation Systems
Bhavani Raskutti, Ingrid Zukerman
UAI1
1991 Generation and Selection of Likely Interpretations during Plan Recognition in Task-Oriented Consultation Systems
Bhavani Raskutti, Ingrid Zukerman
User Model. User Adapt. Interact.1