Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Eva Bolten
dblp:89/6251
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure prediction |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Clustering protein sequences-structure prediction by transitive homology · Bioinform. 2001 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › homology detection
remote homology detection |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Clustering protein sequences-structure prediction by transitive homology · Bioinform. 2001 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein sequence analysis
protein sequence clustering |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Clustering protein sequences-structure prediction by transitive homology · Bioinform. 2001 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
smith-waterman alignment · 0.0graph-based clustering · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | Clustering protein sequences-structure prediction by transitive homologyabstractMOTIVATION: It is widely believed that for two proteins Aand Ba sequence identity above some threshold implies structural similarity due to a common evolutionary ancestor. Since this is only a sufficient, but not a necessary condition for structural similarity, the question remains what other criteria can be used to identify remote homologues. Transitivity refers to the concept of deducing a structural similarity between proteins A and C from the existence of a third protein B, such that A and B as well as B and C are homologues, as ascertained if the sequence identity between A and B as well as that between B and C is above the aforementioned threshold. It is not fully understood if transitivity always holds and whether transitivity can be extended ad infinitum. RESULTS: We developed a graph-based clustering approach, where transitivity plays a crucial role. We determined all pair-wise similarities for the sequences in the SwissProt database using the Smith-Waterman local alignment algorithm. This data was transformed into a directed graph, where protein sequences constitute vertices. A directed edge was drawn from vertex A to vertex B if the sequences A and B showed similarity, scaled with respect to the self-similarity of A, above a fixed threshold. Transitivity was important in the clustering process, as intermediate sequences were used, limited though by the requirement of having directed paths in both directions between proteins linked over such sequences. The length dependency-implied by the self-similarity-of the scaling of the alignment scores appears to be an effective criterion to avoid clustering errors due to multi-domain proteins. To deal with the resulting large graphs we have developed an efficient library. Methods include the novel graph-based clustering algorithm capable of handling multi-domain proteins and cluster comparison algorithms. Structural Classification of Proteins (SCOP) was used as an evaluation data set for our method, yielding a 24% improvement over pair-wise comparisons in terms of detecting remote homologues. AVAILABILITY: The software is available to academic users on request from the authors. CONTACT: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: http://www.zaik.uni-koeln.de/~schliep/ProtClust.html. Eva Bolten, Alexander Schliep, Sebastian Schneckener, Dietmar Schomburg, Rainer Schrader |
Bioinform. | 1 |