Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Philip Lopresti

dblp:89/6268 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs · 77% Integrated circuit design · 23%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Integrated circuit design › ASIC design
structured ASIC
0.012004
What happened to ASIC?: Go (recon)figure? · DAC 2004
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2004 What happened to ASIC?: Go (recon)figure?
abstract
Increasing design cost and risk is causing more and more designers to build configurable platforms that will amortize design and manufacturing costs across many generations. Several reconfiguration schemes exist and none of them seems to be a clear winner. Most notably there are three forms of technology: structured ASIC, configurable software programmable, reconfigurable FPGA-like platform. New solutions are emerging and may induce drastic changes in the current industry organization. The panel will examine factors in the success of the various options, and look to what the future might bring.
Nitin Deo, Behrooz Zahiri, Ivo Bolsens, Jason Cong, Bhusan Gupta, Philip Lopresti, Christopher B. Reynolds, Chris Rowen, Ray Simar Jr.
DAC6