Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pascal Benkert

dblp:89/7243 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
0000-0001-6525-8174ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure prediction
0.322012
Improving your target-template alignment with MODalign · Bioinform. 2012
Toward the estimation of the absolute quality of individual protein structure models · Bioinform. 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
template-based modeling
0.112012
Improving your target-template alignment with MODalign · Bioinform. 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
model quality assessment
0.112011
Toward the estimation of the absolute quality of individual protein structure models · Bioinform. 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology
multiple sequence alignment
0.012012
Improving your target-template alignment with MODalign · Bioinform. 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology
sequence analysis
0.012012
Improving your target-template alignment with MODalign · Bioinform. 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure analysis
protein structure validation
0.012011
Toward the estimation of the absolute quality of individual protein structure models · Bioinform. 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

interactive visualization · 0.1z-score normalization · 0.1QMEAN scoring · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Improving your target-template alignment with MODalign
abstract
SUMMARY: MODalign is an interactive web-based tool aimed at helping protein structure modelers to inspect and manually modify the alignment between the sequences of a target protein and of its template(s). It interactively computes, displays and, upon modification of the target-template alignment, updates the multiple sequence alignments of the two protein families, their conservation score, secondary structure and solvent accessibility values, and local quality scores of the implied three-dimensional model(s). Although it has been designed to simplify the target-template alignment step in modeling, it is suitable for all cases where a sequence alignment needs to be inspected in the context of other biological information. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Freely available on the web at http://modorama.biocomputing.it/modalign. Website implemented in HTML and JavaScript with all major browsers supported. CONTACT: [email protected].
Alessandro Barbato, Pascal Benkert, Torsten Schwede, Anna Tramontano, Jan Kosinski
Bioinform.2
2011 Toward the estimation of the absolute quality of individual protein structure models
abstract
MOTIVATION: Quality assessment of protein structures is an important part of experimental structure validation and plays a crucial role in protein structure prediction, where the predicted models may contain substantial errors. Most current scoring functions are primarily designed to rank alternative models of the same sequence supporting model selection, whereas the prediction of the absolute quality of an individual protein model has received little attention in the field. However, reliable absolute quality estimates are crucial to assess the suitability of a model for specific biomedical applications. RESULTS: In this work, we present a new absolute measure for the quality of protein models, which provides an estimate of the 'degree of nativeness' of the structural features observed in a model and describes the likelihood that a given model is of comparable quality to experimental structures. Model quality estimates based on the QMEAN scoring function were normalized with respect to the number of interactions. The resulting scoring function is independent of the size of the protein and may therefore be used to assess both monomers and entire oligomeric assemblies. Model quality scores for individual models are then expressed as 'Z-scores' in comparison to scores obtained for high-resolution crystal structures. We demonstrate the ability of the newly introduced QMEAN Z-score to detect experimentally solved protein structures containing significant errors, as well as to evaluate theoretical protein models. In a comprehensive QMEAN Z-score analysis of all experimental structures in the PDB, membrane proteins accumulate on one side of the score spectrum and thermostable proteins on the other. Proteins from the thermophilic organism Thermatoga maritima received significantly higher QMEAN Z-scores in a pairwise comparison with their homologous mesophilic counterparts, underlining the significance of the QMEAN Z-score as an estimate of protein stability. AVAILABILITY: The Z-score calculation has been integrated in the QMEAN server available at: http://swissmodel.expasy.org/qmean.
Pascal Benkert, Marco Biasini, Torsten Schwede
Bioinform.1