Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Marc E. Maier
dblp:89/848
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 3 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 66% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 34% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Computational finance and economics · 95% Computational social science and digital humanities · 5% | |
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 59% Automated reasoning and model checking · 24% Approximation and online algorithms · 18% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
4 papers |
Data mining · 77% Data integration and cleaning · 23% |
Topics — the 20 heaviest of 21, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
survival analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Transforming Underwriting in the Life Insurance Industry · AAAI 2019 |
Computational finance and economics
insurance |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Transforming Underwriting in the Life Insurance Industry · AAAI 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal discovery |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Relational Blocking for Causal Discovery · AAAI 2011 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › causal reasoning
causal graphical model |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Relational Blocking for Causal Discovery · AAAI 2011 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
causal reasoning |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Relational Blocking for Causal Discovery · AAAI 2011 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Relational Blocking for Causal Discovery · AAAI 2011 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal model |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Learning Causal Models of Relational Domains · AAAI 2010 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › semantic representation
relational representation |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Learning Causal Models of Relational Domains · AAAI 2010 |
Data mining › causal inference › causal modeling
causal discovery |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Automatic identification of quasi-experimental designs for discovering causal knowledge · KDD 2008 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
theorem proving |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Automatic identification of quasi-experimental designs for discovering causal knowledge · KDD 2008 |
Computational finance and economics
fraud detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Relational data pre-processing techniques for improved securities fraud detection · KDD 2007 |
Data mining
clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Graph clustering with network structure indices · ICML 2007 |
Data integration and cleaning
data preprocessing |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Relational data pre-processing techniques for improved securities fraud detection · KDD 2007 |
Data mining › clustering › exemplar-based clustering
k-medoids clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Graph clustering with network structure indices · ICML 2007 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph clustering
community detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Graph clustering with network structure indices · ICML 2007 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Graph clustering with network structure indices · ICML 2007 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › shortest path
approximate shortest paths |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Using structure indices for efficient approximation of network properties · KDD 2006 |
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation algorithms › approximation algorithms for graph problems
distance approximation |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Using structure indices for efficient approximation of network properties · KDD 2006 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
statistical relational learning |
0.0 | 1 | 2007 | Relational data pre-processing techniques for improved securities fraud detection · KDD 2007 |
Data mining
relational data analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | Using structure indices for efficient approximation of network properties · KDD 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
survival modeling · 0.8machine learning · 0.8theorem proving · 0.2first-order logic · 0.2aggregate variable construction · 0.2statistical relational learning · 0.2normalization · 0.2link formation · 0.2network structure indices · 0.1girvan-newman · 0.1relational blocking · 0.1d-separation · 0.1distance estimation · 0.1relational PC algorithm · 0.1edge-betweenness centrality · 0.1edge betweenness centrality · 0.1graph annotation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Transforming Underwriting in the Life Insurance IndustryabstractLife insurance provides trillions of dollars of financial security for hundreds of millions of individuals and families worldwide. Life insurance companies must accurately assess individual-level mortality risk to simultaneously maintain financial strength and price their products competitively. The traditional underwriting process used to assess this risk is based on manually examining an applicant’s health, behavioral, and financial profile. The existence of large historical data sets provides an unprecedented opportunity for artificial intelligence and machine learning to transform underwriting in the life insurance industry. We present an overview of how a rich application data set and survival modeling were combined to develop a life score that has been deployed in an algorithmic underwriting system at MassMutual, an American mutual life insurance company serving millions of clients. Through a novel evaluation framework, we show that the life score outperforms traditional underwriting by 6% on the basis of claims. We describe how engagement with actuaries, medical doctors, underwriters, and reinsurers was paramount to building an algorithmic underwriting system with a predictive model at its core. Finally, we provide details of the deployed system and highlight its value, which includes saving millions of dollars in operational efficiency while driving the decisions behind tens of billions of dollars of benefits. Marc E. Maier, Hayley Carlotto, Freddie Sanchez, Sherriff Balogun, Sears A. Merritt |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2015 | Learning the Structure of Causal Models with Relational and Temporal Dependence
Katerina Marazopoulou, Marc E. Maier, David D. Jensen |
UAI | 2 |
| 2013 | A Sound and Complete Algorithm for Learning Causal Models from Relational Data
Marc E. Maier, Katerina Marazopoulou, David T. Arbour, David D. Jensen |
UAI | 1 |
| 2011 | Relational Blocking for Causal DiscoveryabstractBlocking is a technique commonly used in manual statistical analysis to account for confounding variables. However, blocking is not currently used in automated learning algorithms. These algorithms rely solely on statistical conditioning as an operator to identify conditional independence. In this work, we present relational blocking as a new operator that can be used for learning the structure of causal models. We describe how blocking is enabled by relational data sets, where blocks are determined by the links in the network. By blocking on entities rather than conditioning on variables, relational blocking can account for both measured and unobserved variables. We explain the mechanism of these methods using graphical models and the semantics of d-separation. Finally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of relational blocking for use in causal discovery by showing how blocking can be used in the causal analysis of two real-world social media systems. Matthew J. Rattigan, Marc E. Maier, David D. Jensen |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2011 | Indexing Network Structure with Shortest-Path TreesabstractThe ability to discover low-cost paths in networks has practical consequences for knowledge discovery and social network analysis tasks. Many analytic techniques for networks require finding low-cost paths, but exact methods for search become prohibitive for large networks, and data sets are steadily increasing in size. Short paths can be found efficiently by utilizing an index of network structure, which estimates network distances and enables rapid discovery of short paths. Through experiments on synthetic networks, we demonstrate that one such novel network structure index based on the shortest-path tree outperforms other previously proposed indices. We also show that it generalizes across arbitrarily weighted networks of various structures and densities, provides accurate estimates of distance, and has efficient time and space complexity. We present results on real data sets for several applications, including navigation, diameter estimation, centrality computation, and clustering---all made efficient by virtue of the network structure index. Marc E. Maier, Matthew J. Rattigan, David D. Jensen |
ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data | 1 |
| 2010 | Learning Causal Models of Relational DomainsabstractMethods for discovering causal knowledge from observational data have been a persistent topic of AI research for several decades. Essentially all of this work focuses on knowledge representations for propositional domains. In this paper, we present several key algorithmic and theoretical innovations that extend causal discovery to relational domains. We provide strong evidence that effective learning of causal models is enhanced by relational representations. We present an algorithm, relational PC, that learns causal dependencies in a state-of-the-art relational representation, and we identify the key representational and algorithmic innovations that make the algorithm possible. Finally, we prove the algorithm's theoretical correctness and demonstrate its effectiveness on synthetic and real data sets. Marc E. Maier, Brian J. Taylor, Hüseyin Oktay, David D. Jensen |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2008 | Automatic identification of quasi-experimental designs for discovering causal knowledgeabstractResearchers in the social and behavioral sciences routinely rely on quasi-experimental designs to discover knowledge from large data-bases. Quasi-experimental designs (QEDs) exploit fortuitous circumstances in non-experimental data to identify situations (sometimes called "natural experiments") that provide the equivalent of experimental control and randomization. QEDs allow researchers in domains as diverse as sociology, medicine, and marketing to draw reliable inferences about causal dependencies from non-experimental data. Unfortunately, identifying and exploiting QEDs has remained a painstaking manual activity, requiring researchers to scour available databases and apply substantial knowledge of statistics. However, recent advances in the expressiveness of databases, and increases in their size and complexity, provide the necessary conditions to automatically identify QEDs. In this paper, we describe the first system to discover knowledge by applying quasi-experimental designs that were identified automatically. We demonstrate that QEDs can be identified in a traditional database schema and that such identification requires only a small number of extensions to that schema, knowledge about quasi-experimental design encoded in first-order logic, and a theorem-proving engine. We describe several key innovations necessary to enable this system, including methods for automatically constructing appropriate experimental units and for creating aggregate variables on those units. We show that applying the resulting designs can identify important causal dependencies in real domains, and we provide examples from academic publishing, movie making and marketing, and peer-production systems. Finally, we discuss the integration of QEDs with other approaches to causal discovery, including joint modeling and directed experimentation. David D. Jensen, Andrew S. Fast, Brian J. Taylor, Marc E. Maier |
KDD | 4 |
| 2007 | Graph clustering with network structure indicesabstractGraph clustering has become ubiquitous in the study of relational data sets. We examine two simple algorithms: a new graphical adaptation of the k-medoids algorithm and the Girvan-Newman method based on edge betweenness centrality. We show that they can be effective at discovering the latent groups or communities that are defined by the link structure of a graph. However, both approaches rely on prohibitively expensive computations, given the size of modern relational data sets. Network structure indices (NSIs) are a proven technique for indexing network structure and efficiently finding short paths. We show how incorporating NSIs into these graph clustering algorithms can overcome these complexity limitations. We also present promising quantitative and qualitative evaluations of the modified algorithms on synthetic and real data sets. Matthew J. Rattigan, Marc E. Maier, David D. Jensen |
ICML | 2 |
| 2007 | Relational data pre-processing techniques for improved securities fraud detectionabstractCommercial datasets are often large, relational, and dynamic. They contain many records of people, places, things, events and their interactions over time. Such datasets are rarely structured appropriately for knowledge discovery, and they often contain variables whose meanings change across different subsets of the data. We describe how these challenges were addressed in a collaborative analysis project undertaken by the University of Massachusetts Amherst and the National Association of Securities Dealers(NASD). We describe several methods for data pre-processing that we applied to transform a large, dynamic, and relational dataset describing nearly the entirety of the U.S. securities industry, and we show how these methods made the dataset suitable for learning statistical relational models. To better utilize social structure, we first applied known consolidation and link formation techniques to associate individuals with branch office locations. In addition, we developed an innovative technique to infer professional associations by exploiting dynamic employment histories. Finally, we applied normalization techniques to create a suitable class label that adjusts for spatial, temporal, and other heterogeneity within the data. We show how these pre-processing techniques combine to provide the necessary foundation for learning high-performing statistical models of fraudulent activity. Andrew S. Fast, Lisa Friedland, Marc E. Maier, Brian J. Taylor, David D. Jensen, Henry G. Goldberg, John Komoroske |
KDD | 3 |
| 2006 | Using structure indices for efficient approximation of network propertiesabstractStatistics on networks have become vital to the study of relational data drawn from areas such as bibliometrics, fraud detection, bioinformatics, and the Internet. Calculating many of the most important measures - such as betweenness centrality, closeness centrality, and graph diameter-requires identifying short paths in these networks. However, finding these short paths can be intractable for even moderate-size networks. We introduce the concept of a network structure index (NSI), a composition of (1) a set of annotations on every node in the network and (2) a function that uses the annotations to estimate graph distance between pairs of nodes. We present several varieties of NSIs, examine their time and space complexity, and analyze their performance on synthetic and real data sets. We show that creating an NSI for a given network enables extremely efficient and accurate estimation of a wide variety of network statistics on that network. Matthew J. Rattigan, Marc E. Maier, David D. Jensen |
KDD | 2 |