Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kandan Ramakrishnan
dblp:90/11338
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Video understanding and tracking · 48% Efficient and distributed learning · 15% Representation and self-supervised learning · 15% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
action recognition |
1.5 | 3 | 2022 | Multi-Moments in Time: Learning and Interpreting Models for Multi-Action Video Understanding · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022 Deep Analysis of CNN-Based Spatio-Temporal Representations for Action Recognition · CVPR 2021 Moments in Time Dataset: One Million Videos for Event Understanding · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning
neural architecture search |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | NASTransfer: Analyzing Architecture Transferability in Large Scale Neural Architecture Search · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
spatio-temporal representation learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Deep Analysis of CNN-Based Spatio-Temporal Representations for Action Recognition · CVPR 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › event analysis
event understanding |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Moments in Time Dataset: One Million Videos for Event Understanding · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-label classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Multi-Moments in Time: Learning and Interpreting Models for Multi-Action Video Understanding · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | NASTransfer: Analyzing Architecture Transferability in Large Scale Neural Architecture Search · AAAI 2021 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › action recognition
multimodal action recognition |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Moments in Time Dataset: One Million Videos for Event Understanding · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
model interpretation · 0.6long-tail learning · 0.6transfer learning · 0.5neural architecture search · 0.53D CNN · 0.52D CNN · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Multi-Moments in Time: Learning and Interpreting Models for Multi-Action Video UnderstandingabstractVideos capture events that typically contain multiple sequential, and simultaneous, actions even in the span of only a few seconds. However, most large-scale datasets built to train models for action recognition in video only provide a single label per video. Consequently, models can be incorrectly penalized for classifying actions that exist in the videos but are not explicitly labeled and do not learn the full spectrum of information present in each video in training. Towards this goal, we present the Multi-Moments in Time dataset (M-MiT) which includes over two million action labels for over one million three second videos. This multi-label dataset introduces novel challenges on how to train and analyze models for multi-action detection. Here, we present baseline results for multi-action recognition using loss functions adapted for long tail multi-label learning, provide improved methods for visualizing and interpreting models trained for multi-label action detection and show the strength of transferring models trained on M-MiT to smaller datasets. Mathew Monfort, Bowen Pan, Kandan Ramakrishnan, Alex Andonian, Barry A. McNamara, Alex Lascelles, Quanfu Fan, Dan Gutfreund, Rogério Feris, Aude Oliva |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 3 |
| 2021 | NASTransfer: Analyzing Architecture Transferability in Large Scale Neural Architecture SearchabstractNeural Architecture Search (NAS) is an open and challenging problem in machine learning. While NAS offers great promise, the prohibitive computational demand of most of the existing NAS methods makes it difficult to directly search the architectures on large-scale tasks. The typical way of conducting large scale NAS is to search for an architectural building block on a small dataset (either using a proxy set from the large dataset or a completely different small scale dataset) and then transfer the block to a larger dataset. Despite a number of recent results that show the promise of transfer from proxy datasets, a comprehensive evaluation of different NAS methods studying the impact of different source datasets has not yet been addressed. In this work, we propose to analyze the architecture transferability of different NAS methods by performing a series of experiments on large scale benchmarks such as ImageNet1K and ImageNet22K. We find that: (i) The size and domain of the proxy set does not seem to influence architecture performance on the target dataset. On average, transfer performance of architectures searched using completely different small datasets (e.g., CIFAR10) perform similarly to the architectures searched directly on proxy target datasets. However, design of proxy sets has considerable impact on rankings of different NAS methods. (ii) While different NAS methods show similar performance on a source dataset (e.g., CIFAR10), they significantly differ on the transfer performance to a large dataset (e.g., ImageNet1K). (iii) Even on large datasets, random sampling baseline is very competitive, but the choice of the appropriate combination of proxy set and search strategy can provide significant improvement over it. We believe that our extensive empirical analysis will prove useful for future design of NAS algorithms. Rameswar Panda, Michele Merler, Mayoore S. Jaiswal, Hui Wu 0009, Kandan Ramakrishnan, Ulrich Finkler, Chun-Fu Chen 0001, Minsik Cho, Rogério Feris, David S. Kung 0001, Bishwaranjan Bhattacharjee |
AAAI | 5 |
| 2021 | Deep Analysis of CNN-Based Spatio-Temporal Representations for Action RecognitionabstractIn recent years, a number of approaches based on 2D or 3D convolutional neural networks (CNN) have emerged for video action recognition, achieving state-of-the-art results on several large-scale benchmark datasets. In this paper, we carry out in-depth comparative analysis to better understand the differences between these approaches and the progress made by them. To this end, we develop an unified framework for both 2D-CNN and 3D-CNN action models, which enables us to remove bells and whistles and provides a common ground for fair comparison. We then conduct an effort towards a large-scale analysis involving over 300 action recognition models. Our comprehensive analysis reveals that a) a significant leap is made in efficiency for action recognition, but not in accuracy; b) 2D-CNN and 3D-CNN models behave similarly in terms of spatio-temporal representation abilities and transferability. Our codes are available at https://github.com/IBM/action-recognition-pytorch. Chun-Fu Chen 0001, Rameswar Panda, Kandan Ramakrishnan, Rogério Feris, John Cohn, Aude Oliva, Quanfu Fan |
CVPR | 3 |
| 2020 | Moments in Time Dataset: One Million Videos for Event UnderstandingabstractWe present the Moments in Time Dataset, a large-scale human-annotated collection of one million short videos corresponding to dynamic events unfolding within three seconds. Modeling the spatial-audio-temporal dynamics even for actions occurring in 3 second videos poses many challenges: meaningful events do not include only people, but also objects, animals, and natural phenomena; visual and auditory events can be symmetrical in time ("opening" is "closing" in reverse), and either transient or sustained. We describe the annotation process of our dataset (each video is tagged with one action or activity label among 339 different classes), analyze its scale and diversity in comparison to other large-scale video datasets for action recognition, and report results of several baseline models addressing separately, and jointly, three modalities: spatial, temporal and auditory. The Moments in Time dataset, designed to have a large coverage and diversity of events in both visual and auditory modalities, can serve as a new challenge to develop models that scale to the level of complexity and abstract reasoning that a human processes on a daily basis. Mathew Monfort, Carl Vondrick, Aude Oliva, Alex Andonian, Bolei Zhou, Kandan Ramakrishnan, Sarah Adel Bargal, Tom Yan, Lisa M. Brown, Quanfu Fan, Dan Gutfreund |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 6 |
| 2014 | Visual dictionaries in the Brain: Comparing HMAX and BOWabstractThe human visual system is thought to use features of intermediate complexity for scene representation. How the brain computationally represents intermediate features is, however, still unclear. Here we tested and compared two widely used computational models — the biologically plausible HMAX model and Bag of Words (BoW) model from computer vision against human brain activity. These computational models use visual dictionaries, candidate features of intermediate complexity, to represent visual scenes, and the models have been proven effective in automatic object and scene recognition. We analyzed where in the brain and to what extent human fMRI responses to natural scenes can be accounted for by the HMAX and BoW representations. Voxel-wise application of a distance-based variation partitioning method reveals that HMAX explains significant brain activity in early visual regions and also in higher regions such as LO, TO while the BoW primarily explains brain acitvity in the early visual area. Notably, both HMAX and BoW explain the most brain activity in higher areas such as V4 and TO. These results suggest that visual dictionaries might provide a suitable computation for the representation of intermediate features in the brain. Kandan Ramakrishnan, Iris I. A. Groen, H. Steven Scholte, Arnold W. M. Smeulders, Sennay Ghebreab |
ICME | 1 |
| 2012 | Learning Domain-Specific Feature Descriptors for Document ImagesabstractMany machine learning algorithms rely on feature descriptors to access information about image appearance. Using an appropriate descriptor is therefore crucial for the algorithm to succeed. Although domain- and task-specific feature descriptors may result in excellent performance, they currently have to be hand-crafted, a difficult and time-consuming process. In contrast, general-purpose descriptors (such as SIFT) are easy to apply and have proved successful for a variety of tasks, including classification, segmentation, and clustering. Unfortunately, most general-purpose feature descriptors are targeted at natural images and may perform poorly in document analysis tasks. In this paper, we propose a method for automatically learning feature descriptors tuned to a given image domain. The method works by first extracting the independent components of the images, and then building a descriptor by pooling these components over multiple overlapping regions. We test the proposed method on several document analysis tasks and several datasets, and show that it outperforms existing general-purpose feature descriptors. Kandan Ramakrishnan, Evgeniy Bart |
Document Analysis Systems | 1 |