Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alan E. Gelfand
dblp:90/1499
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 75% Information extraction and text analysis · 25% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data integration and cleaning · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › topic model
latent dirichlet allocation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Markov-modulated Marked Poisson Processes for Check-in Data · ICML 2016 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Markov-modulated Marked Poisson Processes for Check-in Data · ICML 2016 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › point process
marked point processes |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Markov-modulated Marked Poisson Processes for Check-in Data · ICML 2016 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
point process |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Markov-modulated Marked Poisson Processes for Check-in Data · ICML 2016 |
Internet of things and sensor networks
sensor data management |
0.0 | 1 | 2007 | Making Sense of Suppressions and Failures in Sensor Data: A Bayesian Approach · VLDB 2007 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
bayesian inference · 0.4posterior inference · 0.2markov jump process · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Markov-modulated Marked Poisson Processes for Check-in DataabstractWe develop continuous-time probabilistic models to study trajectory data consisting of times and locations of user “check-ins”. We model the data as realizations of a marked point process, with intensity and mark-distribution modulated by a latent Markov jump process (MJP). We also include user-heterogeneity in our model by assigning each user a vector of “preferred locations”. Our model extends latent Dirichlet allocation by dropping the bag-of-words assumption and operating in continuous time. We show how an appropriate choice of priors allows efficient posterior inference. Our experiments demonstrate the usefulness of our approach by comparing with various baselines on a variety of tasks. Jiangwei Pan, Vinayak A. Rao, Pankaj K. Agarwal, Alan E. Gelfand |
ICML | 4 |
| 2011 | Scaling up: linking field data and remote sensing with a hierarchical modelabstractEcologists often seek to understand patterns and processes across multiple spatial and temporal scales ranging from centimeters to hundreds of meters and from seconds to years. Hierarchical statistical models offer a framework for sampling design and analysis that can be used to incorporate the information collected at finer scales while allowing comparison at coarser scales. In this study we use a Hierarchical Bayesian model to assess the relationship between measurements collected on the ground at centimeter scales nested within 2 × 3 m quadrats, which are in turn nested within much larger (0.1–12 ha) plots. We compare these measurements with the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) derived from radiometrically and geometrically corrected 30-m resolution LANDSAT ETM+ data to assess the NDVI–Biomass relationship in the Cape Floristic Region of South Africa. Our novel modeling approach allows the data observed at submeter scales to be incorporated directly into the model and thus all the data (and variability) collected at finer scales are represented in the estimates of biomass at the LANDSAT scale. The model reveals that there is a strong correlation between NDVI and biomass, which supports the use of NDVI in spatiotemporal analysis of vegetation dynamics in Mediterranean shrubland ecosystems. The methods developed here can be easily generalized to other ecosystems and ecophysiological parameters. Adam M. Wilson, John A. Silander, Alan E. Gelfand, Jonathan H. Glenn |
Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. | 3 |
| 2007 | Making Sense of Suppressions and Failures in Sensor Data: A Bayesian Approach
Adam Silberstein, Alan E. Gelfand, Kamesh Munagala, Gavino Puggioni, Jun Yang 0001 |
VLDB | 2 |