Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hua Xiang 0002
dblp:90/1977-2
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0002-5094-2376ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
High-performance computing · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
High-performance computing › parallel numerical algorithms
communication-avoiding algorithms |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Communication avoiding Gaussian elimination · SC 2008 |
High-performance computing › numerical linear algebra
dense linear algebra |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Communication avoiding Gaussian elimination · SC 2008 |
High-performance computing › numerical linear algebra › matrix factorization
LU decomposition |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Communication avoiding Gaussian elimination · SC 2008 |
High-performance computing
parallel numerical algorithms |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Communication avoiding Gaussian elimination · SC 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
communication complexity analysis · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Inferring Large-Scale Gene Regulatory Networks Using a Randomized Algorithm Based on Singular Value DecompositionabstractReconstructing large-scale gene regulatory networks (GRNs) is a challenging problem in the field of computational biology. Various methods for inferring GRNs have been developed, but they fail to accurately infer GRNs with a large number of genes. Additionally, the existing evaluation indexes for evaluating the constructed networks have obvious disadvantages because GRNs in most biological systems are sparse. In this paper, we develop a new method for inferring GRNs based on randomized singular value decomposition (RSVD) and ordinary differential equation (ODE)-based optimization, denoted as IGRSVD, from large-scale time series data with noise. The three major contributions of this paper are as follows. First, the IGRSVD algorithm uses the RSVD to handle the noise and reduce the original large-scale data into small-scale problems. Second, we propose two new evaluated indexes, the expected value accuracy (EVA) and the expected value error (EVE), to evaluate the performance of inferred networks by considering the sparse features in the network. Finally, the proposed IGRSVD algorithm is compared with the existing SVD algorithm and PCA_CMI algorithm using four subsets from E. coli and datasets from DREAM challenge. The experimental results demonstrate that the IGRSVD algorithm is effective and more suitable for reconstructing large-scale networks. Anjing Fan, Hua Xiang 0002, Xiu-Fen Zou |
IEEE ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2008 | Communication avoiding Gaussian eliminationabstractWe present CALU, a Communication Avoiding algorithm for the LU factorization of dense matrices distributed in a two-dimensional cyclic layout. The algorithm is based on a new pivoting strategy, which is stable in practice. The new algorithm is optimal (up to polylogarithmic factors) in the amount of communication it performs. Our experiments show that CALU leads to a reduction in the parallel time, in particular when the latency time is an important factor of the overall time. The factorization of a block-column, a subroutine of CALU, outperforms the corresponding routine PDGETF2 from ScaLAPACK up to a factor of 4.37 on an IBM POWER 5 system and up to a factor of 5.58 on a Cray XT4 system. On square matrices of order 104, CALU outperforms the corresponding routine PDGETRF from ScaLAPACK by a factor of 1.24 on IBM POWER 5 and by a factor of 1.31 on Cray XT4. Laura Grigori, James Demmel, Hua Xiang 0002 |
SC | 3 |