Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Philippe Mulet

dblp:90/2490 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1995
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Programming languages and type systems · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Programming languages and type systems › metaprogramming
metaobject protocol
0.011995
Towards a Methodology for Explicit Composition of MetaObjects · OOPSLA 1995
Programming languages and type systems › metaprogramming
reflection
0.011995
Towards a Methodology for Explicit Composition of MetaObjects · OOPSLA 1995
Programming languages and type systems
method combination
0.011995
Towards a Methodology for Explicit Composition of MetaObjects · OOPSLA 1995
Programming languages and type systems
object-oriented programming
0.011995
Towards a Methodology for Explicit Composition of MetaObjects · OOPSLA 1995
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1995 Towards a Methodology for Explicit Composition of MetaObjects
abstract
Reflective programming languages are those where users' programs are allowed to customize in an organized way the behavior of the language to their own needs. For ten years now, most of the work on reflection revolved around the definition and the implementation of metaobject protocols which express this organization. No methodologies have been proposed for reflective programming per se. This paper proposes a first one aiming at the design of composable metaobjects. Given two independently developed reflective customizations, this methodology proposes principles to be observed in their design such that they can be composed using standard base-level aggregation or specialization. While this paper focuses on a simple MOP and illustrates the methodology on specific examples, this methodology can be generalized to other languages with different MOPs. For instance, we discuss how to adapt it to CLOS.
Philippe Mulet, Jacques Malenfant, Pierre Cointe
OOPSLA1