Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Cosmin Cremarenco
dblp:90/3103
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 33% Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 33% Authentication and access control · 33% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Data models and query languages · 59% Distributed and cloud data management · 41% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Privacy and data protection › privacy-preserving data sharing
encrypted data sharing |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Safe data sharing and data dissemination on smart devices · SIGMOD Conference 2005 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
encryption |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Safe data sharing and data dissemination on smart devices · SIGMOD Conference 2005 |
Authentication and access control › access control › access control mechanisms
key-based access control |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Safe data sharing and data dissemination on smart devices · SIGMOD Conference 2005 |
Data models and query languages
XML data management |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Managing Distributed Workspaces with Active XML · VLDB 2003 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
key distribution · 0.1data encryption · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | Safe data sharing and data dissemination on smart devicesabstractThe erosion of trust put in traditional database servers and in Database Service Providers (DSP), the growing interest for different forms of data dissemination and the concern for protecting children from suspicious Internet content are different factors that lead to move the access control from servers to clients. Due to the intrinsic untrustworthiness of client devices, client-based access control solutions rely on data encryption. The data are kept encrypted at the server and a client is granted access to subparts of them according to the decryption keys in its possession. Several variations of this basic model have been proposed (e.g., [1, 6]) but they have in common to minimize the trust required on the client at the cost of a static way of sharing data. Indeed, whatever the granularity of sharing, the dataset is split in subsets reflecting a current sharing situation, each encrypted with a different key. Once the dataset is encrypted, changes in the access control rules definition may impact the subset boundaries, hence incurring a partial re-encryption of the dataset and a potential redistribution of keys. Luc Bouganim, Cosmin Cremarenco, François Dang Ngoc, Nicolas Dieu, Philippe Pucheral |
SIGMOD Conference | 2 |
| 2003 | Managing Distributed Workspaces with Active XML
Serge Abiteboul, Jérôme Baumgarten, Angela Bonifati, Gregory Cobena, Cosmin Cremarenco, Florin Dragan 0001, Ioana Manolescu, Tova Milo, Nicoleta Preda |
VLDB | 5 |