Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Cosmin Cremarenco

dblp:90/3103 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 33% Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 33% Authentication and access control · 33%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data models and query languages · 59% Distributed and cloud data management · 41%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection › privacy-preserving data sharing
encrypted data sharing
0.112005
Safe data sharing and data dissemination on smart devices · SIGMOD Conference 2005
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
encryption
0.112005
Safe data sharing and data dissemination on smart devices · SIGMOD Conference 2005
Authentication and access control › access control › access control mechanisms
key-based access control
0.112005
Safe data sharing and data dissemination on smart devices · SIGMOD Conference 2005
Data models and query languages
XML data management
0.012003
Managing Distributed Workspaces with Active XML · VLDB 2003

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

key distribution · 0.1data encryption · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2005 Safe data sharing and data dissemination on smart devices
abstract
The erosion of trust put in traditional database servers and in Database Service Providers (DSP), the growing interest for different forms of data dissemination and the concern for protecting children from suspicious Internet content are different factors that lead to move the access control from servers to clients. Due to the intrinsic untrustworthiness of client devices, client-based access control solutions rely on data encryption. The data are kept encrypted at the server and a client is granted access to subparts of them according to the decryption keys in its possession. Several variations of this basic model have been proposed (e.g., [1, 6]) but they have in common to minimize the trust required on the client at the cost of a static way of sharing data. Indeed, whatever the granularity of sharing, the dataset is split in subsets reflecting a current sharing situation, each encrypted with a different key. Once the dataset is encrypted, changes in the access control rules definition may impact the subset boundaries, hence incurring a partial re-encryption of the dataset and a potential redistribution of keys.
Luc Bouganim, Cosmin Cremarenco, François Dang Ngoc, Nicolas Dieu, Philippe Pucheral
SIGMOD Conference2
2003 Managing Distributed Workspaces with Active XML
Serge Abiteboul, Jérôme Baumgarten, Angela Bonifati, Gregory Cobena, Cosmin Cremarenco, Florin Dragan 0001, Ioana Manolescu, Tova Milo, Nicoleta Preda
VLDB5