EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Gérard Cécé
dblp:90/3485
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 5 · 5 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
5 papers |
Logic in computer science · 46% Algorithms and data structures · 23% Computational complexity · 23% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
3 papers |
Program verification · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Algorithms and data structures › randomized algorithms › sampling › markov chain monte carlo
simulation algorithms |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Foundation for a series of efficient simulation algorithms · LICS 2017 |
Logic in computer science › concurrency theory
simulation preorder |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Foundation for a series of efficient simulation algorithms · LICS 2017 |
Computational complexity
time-space tradeoffs |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Foundation for a series of efficient simulation algorithms · LICS 2017 |
Logic in computer science
transition systems |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Foundation for a series of efficient simulation algorithms · LICS 2017 |
Program verification
concurrent program verification |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Verification of programs with half-duplex communication · Inf. Comput. 2005 |
Automata and formal languages › infinite-state systems › channel systems
communicating finite state machines |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Verification of programs with half-duplex communication · Inf. Comput. 2005 |
Program verification
verification decidability |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Programs with Quasi-Stable Channels are Effectively Recognizable (Extended Abstract) · CAV 1997 |
Automata and formal languages › infinite-state systems
channel systems |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Programs with Quasi-Stable Channels are Effectively Recognizable (Extended Abstract) · CAV 1997 |
Program verification
unreliable channels |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | Unreliable Channels are Easier to Verify Than Perfect Channels · Inf. Comput. 1996 |
Automata and formal languages › infinite-state systems › channel systems
lossy channel systems |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | Unreliable Channels are Easier to Verify Than Perfect Channels · Inf. Comput. 1996 |
Automata and formal languages › infinite-state systems › channel systems
FIFO channel systems |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Duplication, Insertion and Lossiness Errors in Unreliable Communication Channels · SIGSOFT FSE 1994 |
Internet architecture and protocols
protocol specification |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Duplication, Insertion and Lossiness Errors in Unreliable Communication Channels · SIGSOFT FSE 1994 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
partition refinement · 0.3maximal transitions · 0.3model checking · 0.2reachability analysis · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Foundation for a series of efficient simulation algorithmsabstractCompute the coarsest simulation preorder included in an initial preorder is used to reduce the resources needed to analyze a given transition system. This technique is applied on many models like Kripke structures, labeled graphs, labeled transition systems or even word and tree automata. Let (Q,→) be a given transition system and ℛinitbe an initial preorder over Q. Until now, algorithms to compute ℛsim, the coarsest simulation included in ℛinit, are either memory efficient or time efficient but not both. In this paper we propose the foundation for a series of efficient simulation algorithms with the introduction of the notion of maximal transitions and the notion of stability of a preorder with respect to a coarser one. As an illustration we solve an open problem by providing the first algorithm with the best published time complexity, O(|Psim|.|→|), and a bit space complexity in O(|Psim|2.log(|Psim|)+|Q|.log(|Q|)), with Psimthe partition induced by ℛsim. Gérard Cécé |
LICS | 1 |
| 2011 | Simulations over Two-Dimensional On-Line Tessellation Automata
Gérard Cécé, Alain Giorgetti |
Developments in Language Theory | 1 |
| 2005 | Verification of programs with half-duplex communication
Gérard Cécé, Alain Finkel |
Inf. Comput. | 1 |
| 1997 | Programs with Quasi-Stable Channels are Effectively Recognizable (Extended Abstract)
Gérard Cécé, Alain Finkel |
CAV | 1 |
| 1996 | Unreliable Channels are Easier to Verify Than Perfect Channels
Gérard Cécé, Alain Finkel, S. Purushothaman Iyer |
Inf. Comput. | 1 |
| 1994 | Duplication, Insertion and Lossiness Errors in Unreliable Communication ChannelsabstractWe consider the problem of verifying correctness of finite state machines that communicate with each other over unbounded FIFO channels that are unreliable. Various problems regarding verification of FIFO channels that can lose messages have been considered by Finkel [10], and by Abdulla and Johnson [1, 2]. We consider, in this paper, other possible unreliable behaviors of communication channels, viz. (a) duplication and (b) insertion errors. Furthermore, we also consider various combinations of duplication, insertion and lossiness errors.Finite state machines that communicate over unbounded FIFO buffers is a model of computation that forms the backbone of ISO standard protocol specification languages Estelle and SDL. While an assumption of a perfect communication medium is reasonable at the higher levels of the OSI protocol stack, the lower levels have to deal with an unreliable communication medium; hence our motivation for the present work.The verification problems that are of interest are reachability, unboundedness, deadlock, and model-checking against CTL. All of these problems are undecidable for machines communicating over reliable unbounded FIFO channels. So, it is perhaps surprising that some of these problems become decidable when unreliable channels are modeled. The contributions of this paper are: (a) An investigation of solutions to these problems for machines with insertion errors, duplication errors, or a combination of duplication, insertion and lossiness errors, and (b) A comparison of the relative expressive power of the various errors. Gérard Cécé, Alain Finkel, S. Purushothaman Iyer |
SIGSOFT FSE | 1 |