Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Wolfgang Brandstätter

dblp:90/3617 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 61% Electronic design automation · 30% Embedded and real-time systems · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
fault diagnosis
0.112011
Application-Level Diagnostic and Membership Protocols for Generic Time-Triggered Systems · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2011
Distributed systems
fault tolerance
0.112011
Application-Level Diagnostic and Membership Protocols for Generic Time-Triggered Systems · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2011
Distributed systems › group communication
group membership
0.112011
Application-Level Diagnostic and Membership Protocols for Generic Time-Triggered Systems · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2011
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time embedded systems
time-triggered systems
0.012011
Application-Level Diagnostic and Membership Protocols for Generic Time-Triggered Systems · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

penalty/reward algorithm · 0.1model checking · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Application-Level Diagnostic and Membership Protocols for Generic Time-Triggered Systems
abstract
We present online tunable diagnostic and membership protocols for generic time-triggered (TT) systems to detect crashes, send/receive omission faults, and network partitions. Compared to existing diagnostic and membership protocols for TT systems, our protocols do not rely on the single-fault assumption and also tolerate non-fail-silent (Byzantine) faults. They run at the application level and can be added on top of any TT system (possibly as a middleware component) without requiring modifications at the system level. The information on detected faults is accumulated using a penalty/reward algorithm to handle transient faults. After a fault is detected, the likelihood of node isolation can be adapted to different system configurations, including configurations where functions with different criticality levels are integrated. All protocols are formally verified using model checking. Using actual automotive and aerospace parameters, we also experimentally demonstrate the transient fault handling capabilities of the protocols.
Marco Serafini, Péter Bokor, Neeraj Suri, Jonny Vinter, Astrit Ademaj, Wolfgang Brandstätter, Fulvio Tagliabo, Jens Koch
IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput.6
2007 A Tunable Add-On Diagnostic Protocol for Time-Triggered Systems
abstract
We present a tunable diagnostic protocol for generic time-triggered (TT) systems to detect crash and send/receive omission faults. Compared to existing diagnostic and membership protocols for TT systems, it does not rely on the single-fault assumption and tolerates malicious faults. It runs at the application level and can be added on top of any TT system (possibly as a middleware component) without requiring modifications at the system level. The information on detected faults is accumulated using a penalty/reward algorithm to handle transient faults. After a fault is detected, the likelihood of node isolation can be adapted to different system configurations, including those where functions with different criticality levels are integrated. Using actual automotive and aerospace parameters, we experimentally demonstrate the transient fault handling capabilities of the protocol.
Marco Serafini, Neeraj Suri, Jonny Vinter, Astrit Ademaj, Wolfgang Brandstätter, Fulvio Tagliabo, Jens Koch
DSN5