Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Daniela Albrecht

dblp:90/5773 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
gene regulation analysis
0.112010
DistanceScan: a tool for promoter modeling · Bioinform. 2010
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation › promoter analysis
promoter modeling
0.112010
DistanceScan: a tool for promoter modeling · Bioinform. 2010
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
transcription factor binding site prediction
0.012010
DistanceScan: a tool for promoter modeling · Bioinform. 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

distance distribution modeling · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 DistanceScan: a tool for promoter modeling
abstract
SUMMARY: The state of the art in promoter modeling for higher eukaryotes is predicting not single transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs), but their combinations. The new tool utilizes a previously developed method of distance distributions of TFBS pairs. We model the random distribution of distances and compare it with the distribution observed in the query sequences. Comparison of the profiles allows filtering out the 'noise' and retaining the potentially functional combinations. This approach has proved its usefulness as a filtering technique for the selection of TFBS pairs for promoter modeling and is now implemented as a tool in R. As an input, it can use the outputs of three different TFBS- and motif-predictive tools (Gibbs Sampler for motifs, Match and MEME/FIMO for PWM-based search). The output is a list of predicted pairs on overrepresented distances with assigned scores, P-values and plots showing the distribution of pairs in the input sequences. AVAILABILITY: The tool is available at https://www.omnifung.hki-jena.de/Rpad/Distance_Scan/index.htm.
Vladimir Shelest, Daniela Albrecht, Ekaterina Shelest
Bioinform.2