L. Clarke

dblp:90/6023 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Authentication and access control · 50% Privacy and data protection · 50%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection › information leakage
credential disclosure
0.112005
Optimizing cost-sensitive trust-negotiation protocols · INFOCOM 2005
Authentication and access control › trust management
trust negotiation
0.112005
Optimizing cost-sensitive trust-negotiation protocols · INFOCOM 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

optimization algorithm · 0.1finite state machine · 0.1complexity analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2005 Optimizing cost-sensitive trust-negotiation protocols
abstract
Trust negotiation is a process that establishes mutual trust by the exchange of digital credentials and/or guiding policies among entities who may have no pre-existing knowledge about each other. Motivated by the desire to disclose as little sensitive information as possible in practice, this paper investigates the problem of minimizing the "cost" of the credentials exchanged by a trust-negotiation protocol. A credential or a policy is assigned a weighted cost, referred to as its sensitivity cost. We formalize an optimization problem, namely the minimum sensitivity cost problem, whose objective is to minimize the total sensitivity costs of the credentials and policies disclosed during trust negotiation. We study the complexity of the minimal sensitivity cost problem and propose algorithms to solve the problem efficiently, for the cases that policies are cost-sensitive and cost-insensitive. A simple finite state machine model of trust-negotiation protocols is presented to model various trust-negotiation protocols, and to provide a quantitative evaluation of the number of exchange rounds needed to achieve a successful negotiation, and the probability of achieving a successful negotiation under various credential disclosure strategies.
Weifeng Chen 0001, L. Clarke, James F. Kurose, Don Towsley
INFOCOM2