Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Walter Kintsch

dblp:90/6235 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 3Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › document organization
hypertext
0.011988
A critical assessment of hypertext systems · CHI 1988
Collaborative and social computing
collaborative systems
0.011988
A critical assessment of hypertext systems · CHI 1988
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Using Technology to Accelerate the Construction of Concept Inventories - Latent Semantic Analysis and the Biology Concept Inventory
abstract
Concept Inventories are multiple choice instruments that map students’ conceptual understanding in a given subject area. They underpin some of the most effective teaching methods in science education, but they are labour intensive and expensive to construct, which limits their wide use in instruction. We describe how we use Latent Semantic Analysis to accelerate the construction of Concept Inventories in general, and the Biology Concept Inventory in particular.
Kathy Garvin-Doxas, Michael Klymkowsky, Isidoros Doxas, Walter Kintsch
CSEDU (2)4
2004 Learning with Diagrams: Effects on Inferences and the Integration of Information
Kirsten R. Butcher, Walter Kintsch
Diagrams2
2002 The potential of latent semantic analysis for machine grading of clinical case summaries
Walter Kintsch
J. Biomed. Informatics1
1992 Modeling User Action Planning: A Comprehension Based Approach
Stephanie M. Doane, Suzanne M. Mannes, Walter Kintsch, Peter G. Polson
User Model. User Adapt. Interact.3
1988 A critical assessment of hypertext systems
abstract
Over forty years ago, Vannevar Bush articulated his vision of a “Memex” machine: “associative indexing, … whereby any item may be caused at will to select immediately and automatically another” [Bush 45]. In the sixties, Engelbart [Engelbart, English 68] built collaborative systems to provide idea structuring and sharing. Nelson [Nelson 81] coined “hypertext” and proposed world-wide networks for publishing, linking, annotating and indexing multiple versions of documents. With increasing numbers of research projects, papers, panels and conferences, and commercially available systems (e.g. Notecards by Xerox, Guide by Owl and HyperCard by Apple) in recent years, hypertext may be an idea whose time has finally come — or at least a phenomenon not to be ignored.
Gerhard Fischer, Stephen A. Weyer, William Jones 0001, Alan C. Kay, Walter Kintsch
CHI5