Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Samuel Gustman

dblp:90/6874 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Audio and music processing · 67% Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 33%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval
evaluation
0.012004
Building an information retrieval test collection for spontaneous conversational speech · SIGIR 2004
Information retrieval › evaluation › test collection
test collection construction
0.012004
Building an information retrieval test collection for spontaneous conversational speech · SIGIR 2004
Audio and music processing
speech recognition
0.012004
Automatic recognition of spontaneous speech for access to multilingual oral history archives · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2004
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › video content analysis
topic segmentation
0.012004
Automatic recognition of spontaneous speech for access to multilingual oral history archives · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2004
Information retrieval › document retrieval
spoken document retrieval
0.012004
Building an information retrieval test collection for spontaneous conversational speech · SIGIR 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

search-guided relevance assessment · 0.0nearest neighbor · 0.0automatic speech recognition · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2004 Issues in Annotation of the Czech Spontaneous Speech Corpus in the MALACH project
Josef Psutka, Pavel Ircing, Jan Hajic 0001, Vlasta Radová, Josef V. Psutka, William J. Byrne, Samuel Gustman
LREC7
2004 Building an information retrieval test collection for spontaneous conversational speech
abstract
Test collections model use cases in ways that facilitate evaluation of information retrieval systems. This paper describes the use of search-guided relevance assessment to create a test collection for retrieval of spontaneous conversational speech. Approximately 10,000 thematically coherent segments were manually identified in 625 hours of oral history interviews with 246 individuals. Automatic speech recognition results, manually prepared summaries, controlled vocabulary indexing, and name authority control are available for every segment. Those features were leveraged by a team of four relevance assessors to identify topically relevant segments for 28 topics developed from actual user requests. Search-guided assessment yielded sufficient inter-annotator agreement to support formative evaluation during system development. Baseline results for ranked retrieval are presented to illustrate use of the collection.
Douglas W. Oard, Dagobert Soergel, David S. Doermann, G. Craig Murray, Jianqiang Wang 0002, Bhuvana Ramabhadran, Martin Franz, Samuel Gustman, James Mayfield, Liliya Kharevych, Stephanie M. Strassel
SIGIR9
2004 Automatic recognition of spontaneous speech for access to multilingual oral history archives
abstract
Much is known about the design of automated systems to search broadcast news, but it has only recently become possible to apply similar techniques to large collections of spontaneous speech. This paper presents initial results from experiments with speech recognition, topic segmentation, topic categorization, and named entity detection using a large collection of recorded oral histories. The work leverages a massive manual annotation effort on 10 000 h of spontaneous speech to evaluate the degree to which automatic speech recognition (ASR)-based segmentation and categorization techniques can be adapted to approximate decisions made by human annotators. ASR word error rates near 40% were achieved for both English and Czech for heavily accented, emotional and elderly spontaneous speech based on 65-84 h of transcribed speech. Topical segmentation based on shifts in the recognized English vocabulary resulted in 80% agreement with manually annotated boundary positions at a 0.35 false alarm rate. Categorization was considerably more challenging, with a nearest-neighbor technique yielding F=0.3. This is less than half the value obtained by the same technique on a standard newswire categorization benchmark, but replication on human-transcribed interviews showed that ASR errors explain little of that difference. The paper concludes with a description of how these capabilities could be used together to search large collections of recorded oral histories.
William J. Byrne, David S. Doermann, Martin Franz, Samuel Gustman, Jan Hajic 0001, Douglas W. Oard, Michael Picheny, Josef Psutka, Bhuvana Ramabhadran, Dagobert Soergel, Todd Ward, Wei-Jing Zhu
IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process.4
2003 Large vocabulary ASR for spontaneous czech in the MALACH project
abstract
This paper describes LVCSR research into the automatic transcription of spontaneous Czech speech in the MALACH (Multilingual Access to Large Spoken Archives) project. This project attempts to provide improved access to the large multilingual spoken archives collected by the Survivors of the Shoah Visual History Foundation (VHF) (www.vhf.org) by advancing the state of the art in automated speech recognition. We describe a baseline ASR system and discuss the problems in language modeling that arise from the nature of Czech as a highly inflectional language that also exhibits diglossia between its written and spontaneous forms. The difficulties of this task are compounded by heavily accented, emotional and disfluent speech along with frequent switching between languages. To overcome the limited amount of relevant language model data we use statistical techniques for selecting an appropriate training corpus from a large unstructured text collection resulting in significant reductions in word error rate. 1.
Josef Psutka, Pavel Ircing, Josef V. Psutka, Vlasta Radová, William J. Byrne, Jan Hajic 0001, Jirí Mírovský, Samuel Gustman
INTERSPEECH8