OBJECTIVE: Patients of different race have different outcomes following renal transplantation. Patients of different race also undergo renal transplantation at different hospitals. We used a novel decentralized multisite approach to quantitatively assess the effect of site of care on racial disparities between non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients in post-transplantation survival times. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, we develop a communication-efficient federated learning algorithm to assess site-of-care associated racial disparities based on decentralized time-to-event data, called Communication-Efficient Distributed Analysis for Racial Disparity in Time-to-event Data (CEDAR-t2e). The algorithm includes 2 modules. Module I is to estimate the site-specific proportional hazards model for time-to-event outcomes in a distributed manner, in which the Poissonization is used to simplify the estimation procedure. Based on the estimated results from Module I, Module II calculates how long the kidney failure time of NHB patients would be extended had they been admitted to transplant centers in the same distribution as NHW patients were admitted. RESULTS: With application to United States Renal Data System data covering 39 043 patients across 73 transplant centers, we found no evidence suggesting the presence of site-of-care associated racial disparities in post-transplantation survival times. In particular, restricting to one year after transplantation, the counterfactual graft failure time would have been extended by only 0.61 days on average if NHB had the same admission distribution to transplant centers as NHW patients. DISCUSSION: The proposed approach offers a quantitative measure to evaluate site-of-care associated racial disparities. CONCLUSION: Our approach has the potential to be extended to investigate site-of-care related disparities in other time-to-event outcomes, thus promoting health equity and improving patient health in various fields.

OBJECTIVES: Racial disparities in kidney transplant access and posttransplant outcomes exist between non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients in the United States, with the site of care being a key contributor. Using multi-site data to examine the effect of site of care on racial disparities, the key challenge is the dilemma in sharing patient-level data due to regulations for protecting patients' privacy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed a federated learning framework, named dGEM-disparity (decentralized algorithm for Generalized linear mixed Effect Model for disparity quantification). Consisting of 2 modules, dGEM-disparity first provides accurately estimated common effects and calibrated hospital-specific effects by requiring only aggregated data from each center and then adopts a counterfactual modeling approach to assess whether the graft failure rates differ if NHB patients had been admitted at transplant centers in the same distribution as NHW patients were admitted. RESULTS: Utilizing United States Renal Data System data from 39 043 adult patients across 73 transplant centers over 10 years, we found that if NHB patients had followed the distribution of NHW patients in admissions, there would be 38 fewer deaths or graft failures per 10 000 NHB patients (95% CI, 35-40) within 1 year of receiving a kidney transplant on average. DISCUSSION: The proposed framework facilitates efficient collaborations in clinical research networks. Additionally, the framework, by using counterfactual modeling to calculate the event rate, allows us to investigate contributions to racial disparities that may occur at the level of site of care. CONCLUSIONS: Our framework is broadly applicable to other decentralized datasets and disparities research related to differential access to care. Ultimately, our proposed framework will advance equity in human health by identifying and addressing hospital-level racial disparities.