Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nathan Coraor
dblp:90/8322 · also Nate Coraor
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0001-8083-2963ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 67% Cloud and datacenter computing · 33% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Performance modeling and evaluation › performance prediction
execution time prediction |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Predicting runtimes of bioinformatics tools based on historical data: five years of Galaxy usage · Bioinform. 2019 |
Cloud and datacenter computing
resource management |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Predicting runtimes of bioinformatics tools based on historical data: five years of Galaxy usage · Bioinform. 2019 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › capacity planning
resource requirement estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Predicting runtimes of bioinformatics tools based on historical data: five years of Galaxy usage · Bioinform. 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
next-generation sequencing data analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Manipulation of FASTQ data with Galaxy · Bioinform. 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
random forest · 0.4quantile regression forest · 0.4gradient boosting · 0.4extra trees · 0.4python · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Fast and accurate genome-wide predictions and structural modeling of protein-protein interactions using GalaxyabstractBACKGROUND: Protein-protein interactions play a crucial role in almost all cellular processes. Identifying interacting proteins reveals insight into living organisms and yields novel drug targets for disease treatment. Here, we present a publicly available, automated pipeline to predict genome-wide protein-protein interactions and produce high-quality multimeric structural models. RESULTS: Application of our method to the Human and Yeast genomes yield protein-protein interaction networks similar in quality to common experimental methods. We identified and modeled Human proteins likely to interact with the papain-like protease of SARS-CoV2's non-structural protein 3. We also produced models of SARS-CoV2's spike protein (S) interacting with myelin-oligodendrocyte glycoprotein receptor and dipeptidyl peptidase-4. CONCLUSIONS: The presented method is capable of confidently identifying interactions while providing high-quality multimeric structural models for experimental validation. The interactome modeling pipeline is available at usegalaxy.org and usegalaxy.eu. Aysam Guerler, Dannon Baker, Marius van den Beek, Björn A. Grüning, Dave Bouvier, Nathan Coraor, Stephen D. Shank, Jordan D. Zehr, Michael C. Schatz, Anton Nekrutenko |
BMC Bioinform. | 6 |
| 2019 | Predicting runtimes of bioinformatics tools based on historical data: five years of Galaxy usageabstractMOTIVATION: One of the many technical challenges that arises when scheduling bioinformatics analyses at scale is determining the appropriate amount of memory and processing resources. Both over- and under-allocation leads to an inefficient use of computational infrastructure. Over allocation locks resources that could otherwise be used for other analyses. Under-allocation causes job failure and requires analyses to be repeated with a larger memory or runtime allowance. We address this challenge by using a historical dataset of bioinformatics analyses run on the Galaxy platform to demonstrate the feasibility of an online service for resource requirement estimation. RESULTS: Here we introduced the Galaxy job run dataset and tested popular machine learning models on the task of resource usage prediction. We include three popular forest models: the extra trees regressor, the gradient boosting regressor and the random forest regressor, and find that random forests perform best in the runtime prediction task. We also present two methods of choosing walltimes for previously unseen jobs. Quantile regression forests are more accurate in their predictions, and grant the ability to improve performance by changing the confidence of the estimates. However, the sizes of the confidence intervals are variable and cannot be absolutely constrained. Random forest classifiers address this problem by providing control over the size of the prediction intervals with an accuracy that is comparable to that of the regressor. We show that estimating the memory requirements of a job is possible using the same methods, which as far as we know, has not been done before. Such estimation can be highly beneficial for accurate resource allocation. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Source code available at https://github.com/atyryshkina/algorithm-performance-analysis, implemented in Python. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Anastasia Tyryshkina, Nathan Coraor, Anton Nekrutenko |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2017 | Jupyter and Galaxy: Easing entry barriers into complex data analyses for biomedical researchersabstractWhat does it take to convert a heap of sequencing data into a publishable result? First, common tools are employed to reduce primary data (sequencing reads) to a form suitable for further analyses (i.e., the list of variable sites). The subsequent exploratory stage is much more ad hoc and requires the development of custom scripts and pipelines, making it problematic for biomedical researchers. Here, we describe a hybrid platform combining common analysis pathways with the ability to explore data interactively. It aims to fully encompass and simplify the "raw data-to-publication" pathway and make it reproducible. Björn A. Grüning, Eric Rasche, Boris Rebolledo-Jaramillo, Carl Eberhard, Torsten Houwaart, John Chilton, Nathan Coraor, Rolf Backofen, James Taylor 0001, Anton Nekrutenko |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 7 |
| 2015 | Enabling cloud bursting for life sciences within GalaxyabstractSummary Fueled by the radically increased capacity to generate data over the past decade, the field of biomedical research has been constrained by the ability to analyze data. Galaxy, a Web‐based, open‐source data integration and analysis platform for life science research, has been democratizing access to data analysis tools. However, the scale of data and the scope of tools required have proven to be a significant challenge for any monolithic deployment of the Galaxy application. We have found that a distributed and federated approach to utilizing compute and storage resources is necessary. This paper describes the ongoing efforts in creating a ubiquitous platform capable of simultaneously utilizing dedicated as well as on‐demand cloud resources. Specifically, the requirements, process, and an implementation of a cloud‐bursting system are detailed. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Enis Afgan, Nathan Coraor, John Chilton, Dannon Baker, James Taylor 0001 |
Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp. | 2 |
| 2010 | Manipulation of FASTQ data with GalaxyabstractSUMMARY: Here, we describe a tool suite that functions on all of the commonly known FASTQ format variants and provides a pipeline for manipulating next generation sequencing data taken from a sequencing machine all the way through the quality filtering steps. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: This open-source toolset was implemented in Python and has been integrated into the online data analysis platform Galaxy (public web access: http://usegalaxy.org; download: http://getgalaxy.org). Two short movies that highlight the functionality of tools described in this manuscript as well as results from testing components of this tool suite against a set of previously published files are available at http://usegalaxy.org/u/dan/p/fastq Daniel J. Blankenberg, Assaf Gordon, Gregory Von Kuster, Nathan Coraor, James Taylor 0001, Anton Nekrutenko |
Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2010 | Galaxy CloudMan: delivering cloud compute clustersabstractBACKGROUND: Widespread adoption of high-throughput sequencing has greatly increased the scale and sophistication of computational infrastructure needed to perform genomic research. An alternative to building and maintaining local infrastructure is "cloud computing", which, in principle, offers on demand access to flexible computational infrastructure. However, cloud computing resources are not yet suitable for immediate "as is" use by experimental biologists. RESULTS: We present a cloud resource management system that makes it possible for individual researchers to compose and control an arbitrarily sized compute cluster on Amazon's EC2 cloud infrastructure without any informatics requirements. Within this system, an entire suite of biological tools packaged by the NERC Bio-Linux team (http://nebc.nerc.ac.uk/tools/bio-linux) is available for immediate consumption. The provided solution makes it possible, using only a web browser, to create a completely configured compute cluster ready to perform analysis in less than five minutes. Moreover, we provide an automated method for building custom deployments of cloud resources. This approach promotes reproducibility of results and, if desired, allows individuals and labs to add or customize an otherwise available cloud system to better meet their needs. CONCLUSIONS: The expected knowledge and associated effort with deploying a compute cluster in the Amazon EC2 cloud is not trivial. The solution presented in this paper eliminates these barriers, making it possible for researchers to deploy exactly the amount of computing power they need, combined with a wealth of existing analysis software, to handle the ongoing data deluge. Enis Afgan, Dannon Baker, Nathan Coraor, Brad A. Chapman, Anton Nekrutenko, James Taylor 0001 |
BMC Bioinform. | 3 |