Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jeff Burns

dblp:90/995 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 5 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers
Integrated circuit design · 56% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 30% Electronic design automation · 15%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Integrated circuit design
technology scaling
0.122011
Moore's Law: another casualty of the financial meltdown? · DAC 2009
Design, CAD and technology challenges for future processors: 3D perspectives · DAC 2011
Integrated circuit design
3d integration
0.122011
Design, CAD and technology challenges for future processors: 3D perspectives · DAC 2011
Moore's Law: another casualty of the financial meltdown? · DAC 2009
Electronic design automation
design methodology
0.012011
Design, CAD and technology challenges for future processors: 3D perspectives · DAC 2011
Integrated circuit design › packaging
system-in-package
0.012009
Moore's Law: another casualty of the financial meltdown? · DAC 2009
Integrated circuit design › VLSI design
standard cell library
0.011999
Panel: Cell Libraries - Build vs. Buy; Static vs. Dynamic · DAC 1999

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

return-on-investment analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Keynote I: "Designing heterogeneous systems in the AI era: Challenges and opportunities"
abstract
Artificial Intelligence has recently become a major trend, driving the rapid development of new compute capabilities. As AI functionality has improved, the demand for even greater capabilities has grown, requiring significantly higher levels of performance and energy-efficiency in the IT infrastructure. The maturation of classical semiconductor scaling has made delivering these higher levels much more challenging; reliance on scaling alone is insufficient. As a result, innovations in design, design automation, and architecture are crucial to improving power-performance. Accelerators in heterogeneous systems will increasingly be needed to improve overall system capabilities and power/performance. To enable practical accelerator integration, system architectures must be designed to easily incorporate heterogeneous components such as today's GPUs, as well as future accelerators for cognitive applications. Design processes must increase in efficiency to enable the cost-effective design of application-specific accelerators. In this presentation, I will describe these trends, some exemplary innovations that address them, and areas of future research towards heterogeneous systems for the AI era.
Jeff Burns
ASP-DAC1
2017 Very Low Voltage (VLV) Design
abstract
This paper is a tutorial-style introduction to a special session on: Effective Voltage Scaling in the Late CMOS Era. It covers the fundamental challenges and associated solution strategies in pursuing very low voltage (VLV) designs. We discuss the performance and system reliability constraints that are key impediments to VLV. The associated trade-offs across power, performance and reliability are helpful in inferring the optimal operational voltage-frequency point. This work was performed under the auspices of an ongoing DARPA program (named PERFECT) that is focused on maximizing system-level energy efficiency.
Ramon Bertran Monfort, Pradip Bose, David Brooks 0001, Jeff Burns, Alper Buyuktosunoglu, Nandhini Chandramoorthy, Eric Cheng, Martin Cochet, Schuyler Eldridge, Daniel J. Friedman, Hans M. Jacobson, Rajiv V. Joshi, Subhasish Mitra, Robert K. Montoye, Arun Paidimarri, Pritish Parida, Kevin Skadron, Mircea R. Stan, Karthik Swaminathan, Augusto Vega, Swagath Venkataramani, Christos Vezyrtzis, Gu-Yeon Wei, John-David Wellman, Matthew M. Ziegler
ICCD4
2011 Design, CAD and technology challenges for future processors: 3D perspectives
abstract
Technology scaling has provided the semiconductor industry a recipe to successfully meet the application demands for performance for over three decades. This computational capacity was further fueled by the success of circuit and architecture-level innovation, which provided performance improvement in each processor generation. However, future processor designs face a number of key challenges in sustaining the growth trends. The dawn of the 22nm node, and beyond, marks an era of new trends and challenges; where the cost and complexity associated with each technology node is increasing at much faster rate than the device performance gains. Novel tools and design methodologies are needed to not only compensate for these challenges but also to leverage emerging technologies to achieve the desired performance in future processor architectures. Technology alternatives such as 3D integration have attracted significant interest as an additional way of sustaining the density scaling and performance growth.
Jeff Burns, Gary Carpenter, Eren Kursun, Ruchir Puri, James D. Warnock, Michael Scheuermann
DAC1
2009 Moore's Law: another casualty of the financial meltdown?
abstract
Given the exponential increase of fabrication costs, the global recession and credit crunch, one may ask if Moore's Law is financially viable beyond 22nm node. Can we justify the return-of-investment (ROI) for continuous scaling beyond 22nm? Shall we consider other alternatives for integration, such as silicon-in-a-package (SiP) or 3D integrations?
Jason Cong, N. S. Nagaraj, Ruchir Puri, William H. Joyner, Jeff Burns, Moshe Gavrielov, Riko Radojcic, Peter Rickert, Hans Stork
DAC5
1999 Panel: Cell Libraries - Build vs. Buy; Static vs. Dynamic
Kurt Keutzer, Kurt Wolf, David Pietromonaco, Jay Maxey, Jeff Lewis, Martin Lefebvre 0001, Jeff Burns
DAC7