Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Adelin Miloslavov

dblp:91/10126 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Internet of things and sensor networks · 87% Vehicular, aerial and satellite networks · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network
sensor fusion
0.112012
Sensor Data Fusion Algorithms for Vehicular Cyber-Physical Systems · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2012
Internet of things and sensor networks › cyber-physical systems
vehicular cyber-physical systems
0.112012
Sensor Data Fusion Algorithms for Vehicular Cyber-Physical Systems · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2012
Vehicular, aerial and satellite networks
vehicular networks
0.012012
Sensor Data Fusion Algorithms for Vehicular Cyber-Physical Systems · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.1sensor data fusion · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Sensor Data Fusion Algorithms for Vehicular Cyber-Physical Systems
abstract
A probe data service has been defined as a means for vehicular on-board units (OBUs) to transmit the data collected by their in-vehicle sensors in real time via wireless communication links to road-site units (RSUs). Sensor data fusion algorithms are developed in this work to aggregate data collected through this probe data service for computing single-RSU and multi-RSU average per-division speeds and average route travel times, where a division is defined to be a small segment of a road. These algorithms are evaluated using an integrated simulation testbed that consists of a vehicular simulator and a wireless communication link simulator, which are interconnected via a TCP/IP connection. Our key findings are that the probe data service offers an excellent means for computing average per-division speeds and average route travel times when the market penetration level of OBUs is relatively high. Privacy constraints negatively impact the accuracy of route travel time estimates as routes often span roads under the wireless coverage area of many road-side units requiring frequent vehicle identity changes. The impact of wireless communication losses is quite significant, requiring the use of accurate models in any simulation-based studies.
Adelin Miloslavov, Malathi Veeraraghavan
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst.1
2011 Validation of vehicular network simulation models with field-test measurements
abstract
Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments (WAVE) networks operating in the Dedicated Short Range Communications (DSRC) band have been deployed as testbeds on which trials have been conducted recently. The goal of this paper is to analyze field-test measurements from these trials, and to use the data to validate assumptions made in simulation models. First, we analyzed the field-test measurements for message success rate and characterized its dependence on distance. Next, using trial-and-error methods, we found the “best” channel model assumptions that fit this field-test data. It consists of using the Nakagami model for fast fading, free space and shadowing model for slow fading, and a shadowing correlation model for retransmissions and acknowledgments. As the field tests were conducted in a variety of environments (tall and short urban-canyon as well as open field), this best-fit model is a generic model that will account for the variability that can be expected in actual deployments as vehicles move between different environments.
Adelin Miloslavov, Malathi Veeraraghavan, Brian L. Smith
IWCMC1