Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shin-I Shih

dblp:91/10915 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing
team collaboration
0.112012
Patterns of team processes and breakdowns in information analysis tasks · CSCW 2012
Collaborative and social computing › team collaboration
team communication
0.112012
Patterns of team processes and breakdowns in information analysis tasks · CSCW 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

task analysis · 0.1interaction analysis · 0.1communication analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Patterns of team processes and breakdowns in information analysis tasks
abstract
In this paper we present findings from a laboratory study of teams of three, collaborating to complete a complex information sharing, synthesis, decision-making task. We use interaction analysis, communication analysis, and task analysis methods to identify the primary activities teams engaged in as they solved a complex information dependant decision-making task. These activities serve as the foundation to present findings related to common team problems and patterns of interaction associated with team performance. We found differences between high and low performing teams related to verbal equity and how they shared and synthesized information.
Marcela Borge, Craig H. Ganoe, Shin-I Shih, John M. Carroll 0001
CSCW3