EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yves Bontemps
dblp:91/3574
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 4 · 3 first-authorTheory of computation · 2 · 2 first-authorComputer networks · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Requirements engineering and software design · 83% Program verification · 17% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Requirements engineering and software design › specification
behavioral specification |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | From Live Sequence Charts to State Machines and Back: A Guided Tour · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2005 |
Requirements engineering and software design › specification
live sequence charts |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | From Live Sequence Charts to State Machines and Back: A Guided Tour · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2005 |
Requirements engineering and software design
model-driven engineering |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | From Live Sequence Charts to State Machines and Back: A Guided Tour · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2005 |
Requirements engineering and software design › specification
scenario-based specification |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | From Live Sequence Charts to State Machines and Back: A Guided Tour · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2005 |
Requirements engineering and software design
software architecture |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | From Live Sequence Charts to State Machines and Back: A Guided Tour · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2005 |
Program verification
specification verification |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | From Live Sequence Charts to State Machines and Back: A Guided Tour · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
game theory · 0.1automata theory · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | Answering the Call for more Accountability: Applying Data Profiling to Museum Metadata
Seth van Hooland, Yves Bontemps, Seth Kaufman |
Dublin Core Conference | 2 |
| 2007 | Generic semantics of feature diagrams
Pierre-Yves Schobbens, Patrick Heymans, Jean-Christophe Trigaux, Yves Bontemps |
Comput. Networks | 4 |
| 2005 | The Complexity of Live Sequence Charts
Yves Bontemps, Pierre-Yves Schobbens |
FoSSaCS | 1 |
| 2005 | 4th international workshop on scenarios and state machines: models, algorithms and tools (SCESM'05)abstractNo abstract available Yves Bontemps, Alexander Egyed |
ICSE | 1 |
| 2005 | Temporal Logic for Scenario-Based Specifications
Hillel Kugler, David Harel, Amir Pnueli, Yves Bontemps |
TACAS | 5 |
| 2005 | From Live Sequence Charts to State Machines and Back: A Guided TourabstractThe problem of relating state-based intraagent (or intraobject) behavioral descriptions with scenario-based interagent (interobject) descriptions has recently focused much interest among the software engineering community. This paper compiles the results of our investigation of this problem. As interagent formalism, we adopt a simple variant of live sequence charts. For the intraagent perspective, we consider a game-theoretic foundation, looking at agents as "strategies," which encompasses the popular "state-based" paradigm. Three classes of relationships between models are studied: scenario checking (called eLSC checking), synthesis, and verification. We set a formally defined theoretical stage that allows us to express these three problems very simply, to discuss their complexity, and to describe optimal solutions. Our study reveals the intrinsic high computational difficulty of these tasks. Consequently, many related problems and solutions are surveyed, some of which can be the basis for practical solutions. In this, we also offer a panorama of current research and directions for the future. Yves Bontemps, Patrick Heymans, Pierre-Yves Schobbens |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 1 |
| 2004 | Synthesis of Open Reactive Systems from Scenario-Based Specifications
Yves Bontemps, Pierre-Yves Schobbens, Christof Löding |
Fundam. Informaticae | 1 |