Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Yves Bontemps

dblp:91/3574 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 4 · 3 first-authorTheory of computation · 2 · 2 first-authorComputer networks · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 83% Program verification · 17%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design › specification
behavioral specification
0.112005
From Live Sequence Charts to State Machines and Back: A Guided Tour · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2005
Requirements engineering and software design › specification
live sequence charts
0.112005
From Live Sequence Charts to State Machines and Back: A Guided Tour · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2005
Requirements engineering and software design
model-driven engineering
0.112005
From Live Sequence Charts to State Machines and Back: A Guided Tour · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2005
Requirements engineering and software design › specification
scenario-based specification
0.112005
From Live Sequence Charts to State Machines and Back: A Guided Tour · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2005
Requirements engineering and software design
software architecture
0.112005
From Live Sequence Charts to State Machines and Back: A Guided Tour · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2005
Program verification
specification verification
0.112005
From Live Sequence Charts to State Machines and Back: A Guided Tour · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

game theory · 0.1automata theory · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 Answering the Call for more Accountability: Applying Data Profiling to Museum Metadata
Seth van Hooland, Yves Bontemps, Seth Kaufman
Dublin Core Conference2
2007 Generic semantics of feature diagrams
Pierre-Yves Schobbens, Patrick Heymans, Jean-Christophe Trigaux, Yves Bontemps
Comput. Networks4
2005 The Complexity of Live Sequence Charts
Yves Bontemps, Pierre-Yves Schobbens
FoSSaCS1
2005 4th international workshop on scenarios and state machines: models, algorithms and tools (SCESM'05)
abstract
No abstract available
Yves Bontemps, Alexander Egyed
ICSE1
2005 Temporal Logic for Scenario-Based Specifications
Hillel Kugler, David Harel, Amir Pnueli, Yves Bontemps
TACAS5
2005 From Live Sequence Charts to State Machines and Back: A Guided Tour
abstract
The problem of relating state-based intraagent (or intraobject) behavioral descriptions with scenario-based interagent (interobject) descriptions has recently focused much interest among the software engineering community. This paper compiles the results of our investigation of this problem. As interagent formalism, we adopt a simple variant of live sequence charts. For the intraagent perspective, we consider a game-theoretic foundation, looking at agents as "strategies," which encompasses the popular "state-based" paradigm. Three classes of relationships between models are studied: scenario checking (called eLSC checking), synthesis, and verification. We set a formally defined theoretical stage that allows us to express these three problems very simply, to discuss their complexity, and to describe optimal solutions. Our study reveals the intrinsic high computational difficulty of these tasks. Consequently, many related problems and solutions are surveyed, some of which can be the basis for practical solutions. In this, we also offer a panorama of current research and directions for the future.
Yves Bontemps, Patrick Heymans, Pierre-Yves Schobbens
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.1
2004 Synthesis of Open Reactive Systems from Scenario-Based Specifications
Yves Bontemps, Pierre-Yves Schobbens, Christof Löding
Fundam. Informaticae1