Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Eshel Haritan

dblp:91/4208 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 7 · 2 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
6 papers
Electronic design automation · 56% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 23% Energy-efficient computing · 12%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › system-level design
electronic system level design
0.122008
ESL hand-off: fact or EDA fiction? · DAC 2008
Multicore design is the challenge! what is the solution? · DAC 2008
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test
0.112009
System prototypes: virtual, hardware or hybrid? · DAC 2009
Energy-efficient computing › power management › system-level power management
system-level power optimization
0.112009
From milliwatts to megawatts: system level power challenge · DAC 2009
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
chip multiprocessor
0.112008
Multicore design is the challenge! what is the solution? · DAC 2008
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
multicore design
0.112008
Multicore design is the challenge! what is the solution? · DAC 2008
Electronic design automation › hardware/software co-design
co-simulation
0.012009
System prototypes: virtual, hardware or hybrid? · DAC 2009
Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs
FPGA prototyping
0.012009
System prototypes: virtual, hardware or hybrid? · DAC 2009
Electronic design automation › system-level design
virtual prototyping
0.012009
System prototypes: virtual, hardware or hybrid? · DAC 2009
Electronic design automation
high-level synthesis
0.012008
Multicore design is the challenge! what is the solution? · DAC 2008
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
many-core architecture
0.012008
Reinventing EDA with manycore processors · DAC 2008
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip
on-chip interconnect
0.012008
Multicore design is the challenge! what is the solution? · DAC 2008
Integrated circuit design › digital system design
register-transfer level design
0.012008
ESL hand-off: fact or EDA fiction? · DAC 2008
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Are we there yet? Has IP block assembly become as easy as LEGO?
Bryon Moyer, Joachim Kunkel, John Cornish, Chris Rowen, Eshel Haritan, Yankin Tanurhan
DATE5
2009 System prototypes: virtual, hardware or hybrid?
abstract
Almost all SoC designs today use hardware prototyping at some point of the development cycle to perform hardware/software validation or test interfaces to real-world stimulus. Recently, virtual prototypes have emerged as a way to run system level tests and perform hardware/software co-simulation before silicon or hardware prototypes are available. Does the emergence of virtual prototyping mean the end for FPGA-based prototypes? Will the hardware prototype continue to live on as an integral part of the SoC design cycle? Will hybrids of virtual and hardware prototypes be the answer? Join our expert panelists in a spirited discussion on the best approach for speeding the verification and validation of complex SoC using system prototypes. Virtual, hardware or hybrid -- which will reign supreme?
Tom Borgstrom, Eshel Haritan, Ron Wilson, David Abada, Andrew Dauman, Ramesh Chandra, Olivier Mielo, Chuck Cruse, Achim Nohl
DAC2
2009 EDA in flux: should I stay or should I go?
abstract
A crisis is a terrible thing to waste. Quotes like this are often heard by experts in the industry and academia but what does this mean to me? How should I change my professional interests? How should I evolve my career? How is EDA going to evolve? The panel represents multiple points of views on these questions. Four experts will review the current job situation in EDA and provide a historical perspective for previous recessions. The panel will further discuss views on new directions for the Electronics market, how EDA should evolve, and options for career development during the slow down of the industry.
Eshel Haritan, Andreas Kuehlmann, Tina Jones, John Epperheimer, Jan M. Rabaey, Rahul Razdan, Naveen Gupta
DAC1
2009 From milliwatts to megawatts: system level power challenge
abstract
This panel discusses power optimization at the system level. What are the needs and opportunities? What are examples of successful practices? Can system-level power optimizations ever be automated? Can power optimizations be the enabling event for a methodology change in system-level design?
Ruchir Puri, Eshel Haritan, Stan Krolikoski, Jason Cong, Tim Kogel, Bradley D. McCredie, John Shen, Andrés Takach
DAC2
2008 Multicore design is the challenge! what is the solution?
abstract
Multi Processor SoC (MPSoC) are being designed today. MPSoC design can help achieve aggressive performance and low power targets but it creates new design challenges: How to design the interconnect fabric and memory sub-system to allow the massive data movement required in a multi processor SoC environment? How to develop, debug and verify HW and SW functionality in a MPSoC design? Is MPSoC design an inflection point that will require new design methods including ESL methodologies?
Eshel Haritan, Toshihiro Hattori, Hiroyuki Yagi, Pierre G. Paulin, Marilyn Wolf, Achim Nohl, Drew Wingard, Mike Muller
DAC1
2008 Reinventing EDA with manycore processors
abstract
Faced with continually coping with Moore's Law, computer-aided design (CAD) for integrated circuits is used to facing challenges in our ever-evolving design problem. Increasing device complexity is a perennial challenge and has led to several discontinuities in design methodology. Over the last decade deep submicron physical effects have significantly complicated the design process and required new efforts in design for manufacturability. With the emergence of multicore and manycore microprocessor systems we face a new type of challenge: Not only will our design object (the microprocessor systems themselves) take another leap in complexity, but for the first time in our industry's history we will need to fundamentally change the way we design and implement our software solutions as well. In this panel a broad set of representatives at the front lines of addressing this challenge will outline how they plan to respond. Representative questions to the panelists include:
Sachin S. Sapatnekar, Eshel Haritan, Kurt Keutzer, Anirudh Devgan, Desmond Kirkpatrick, Stephen Meier, Duaine Pryor, Tom Spyrou
DAC2
2008 ESL hand-off: fact or EDA fiction?
abstract
Moving up in the level of abstraction is the holy grail of EDA. Each transition to the next level of abstraction allows 100x improvement in simulation speed and 100x improvement in design productivity. ESL is being promoted as the next level above RTL but is it really happening?
Hiroyuki Yagi, Wolfgang Roesner, Tim Kogel, Eshel Haritan, Hidekazu Tangi, Michael McNamara, Gary Smith 0001, Nikil Dutt, Giovanni Mancini
DAC4