Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Paul Claisse
dblp:91/4406
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
2 papers |
Optical networks · 46% Wireless networking · 39% Routing and switching · 12% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Wireless networking › cross-layer optimization
joint routing and power control |
0.5 | 2 | 2017 | Optimizing Throughput in Optical Networks: The Joint Routing and Power Control Problem · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2017 Optimizing throughput in optical networks: The joint routing and power control problem · INFOCOM 2015 |
Optical networks › optical transmission impairment
fiber nonlinearity |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Optimizing Throughput in Optical Networks: The Joint Routing and Power Control Problem · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2017 |
Optical networks
optical transmission impairment |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Optimizing Throughput in Optical Networks: The Joint Routing and Power Control Problem · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2017 |
Optical networks
routing and wavelength assignment |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Optimizing Throughput in Optical Networks: The Joint Routing and Power Control Problem · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2017 |
Routing and switching › routing
cross-layer routing |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Optimizing throughput in optical networks: The joint routing and power control problem · INFOCOM 2015 |
Wireless networking › wireless network optimization
throughput optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Optimizing throughput in optical networks: The joint routing and power control problem · INFOCOM 2015 |
Mathematical optimization › integer programming
nonlinear integer programming |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Optimizing Throughput in Optical Networks: The Joint Routing and Power Control Problem · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
cross-layer optimization · 0.8polynomial-time approximation scheme · 0.6integer nonlinear programming · 0.2fully polynomial time approximation scheme · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Optimizing Throughput in Optical Networks: The Joint Routing and Power Control ProblemabstractIt is well established that physical layer impairments significantly affect the performance of optical networks. The management of these impairments is critical for successful transmission, and may significantly affect network layer routing decisions. Hence, the traditional divide-and-conquer layered approach is sub-optimal, which has led to work on cross-layer techniques for routing in optical networks. Apart from fiber loss, one critical physical layer impairment that limits the capacity of optical networks is fiber nonlinearity. Handling nonlinearity introduces significant complexity to the traditional cross-layer approaches. We formulate and solve a joint routing and power control problem to optimize the system throughput that takes into consideration both fiber loss and nonlinearity. The joint power control and routing problem considered is a nonlinear integer programming problem. By characterizing the feasible solution space of the power control problem, we find a set of universal power settings that transform the complex power control and routing problem into a constrained path routing problem. We then propose an efficient fully polynomial time approximation scheme to solve the constrained path routing problem. Simulation results show that our proposed algorithm significantly improves network throughput and greatly outperforms greedy heuristics by providing a guaranteed performance bound. Zizhong Cao, Paul Claisse, René-Jean Essiambre, Murali S. Kodialam, T. V. Lakshman |
IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. | 2 |
| 2015 | Optimizing throughput in optical networks: The joint routing and power control problemabstractIt is well established that physical layer impairments significantly affect the performance of optical networks. The management of these impairments is critical for successful transmission, and may significantly affect network layer routing decisions. Hence the traditional divide-and-conquer layered approach is sub-optimal, which has led to work on cross-layer techniques for routing in optical networks. Apart from fiber loss, one critical physical layer impairment that limits the capacity of optical networks is fiber nonlinearity. Handling nonlinearity introduces significant complexity to the traditional cross-layer approaches. We formulate and solve a joint routing and power control problem to optimize the system throughput that takes into consideration both fiber loss and nonlinearity. The joint power control and routing problem considered is a nonlinear integer programming problem. By characterizing the feasible solution space of the power control problem we find a set of universal power settings that transforms the complex power control and routing problem into a constrained path routing problem. We then propose an efficient Fully Polynomial Time Approximation Scheme (FPTAS) to solve the constrained path routing problem. Simulation results show that our proposed algorithm significantly improves network throughput and greatly outperforms greedy heuristics by providing a guaranteed performance bound. Zizhong Cao, Paul Claisse, René-Jean Essiambre, Murali S. Kodialam, T. V. Lakshman |
INFOCOM | 2 |