Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zhihao Zhang 0002

dblp:91/5464-2 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
1as first author
8since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 1 first-author · 7 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
8 papers
Language models and text generation · 45% Reinforcement learning · 19% Speech recognition and synthesis · 11%

Topics — the 21 heaviest of 22, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
LLM agents
1.322026
AgentGym2: Benchmarking Large Language Model Agents in De-Idealized Real-World Environments · ACL (1) 2026
AgentPRM: Process Reward Models for LLM Agents via Step-Wise Promise and Progress · WWW 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
agent benchmarking
1.012026
AgentGym2: Benchmarking Large Language Model Agents in De-Idealized Real-World Environments · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model evaluation
benchmark contamination
1.012026
Reasoning or Memorization? Unreliable Results of Reinforcement Learning Due to Data Contamination · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model evaluation
data contamination
1.012026
Reasoning or Memorization? Unreliable Results of Reinforcement Learning Due to Data Contamination · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation
1.012026
LLMEval-Fair: A Large-Scale Longitudinal Study on Robust and Fair Evaluation of Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
mathematical reasoning
1.012026
Reasoning or Memorization? Unreliable Results of Reinforcement Learning Due to Data Contamination · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
multimodal language model
1.012026
What Makes a Good Speech Tokenizer for LLM-Centric Speech Generation? A Systematic Study · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning from human feedback
process reward model
1.012026
AgentPRM: Process Reward Models for LLM Agents via Step-Wise Promise and Progress · WWW 2026
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning for NLP
reinforcement learning for language models
1.012026
Reasoning or Memorization? Unreliable Results of Reinforcement Learning Due to Data Contamination · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
speech language model
1.012026
What Makes a Good Speech Tokenizer for LLM-Centric Speech Generation? A Systematic Study · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
speech-text alignment
1.012026
What Makes a Good Speech Tokenizer for LLM-Centric Speech Generation? A Systematic Study · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › parameter-efficient fine-tuning
LoRA mixture of experts
0.912025
LoRACoE: Improving Large Language Model via Composition-based LoRA Expert · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
mixture of experts
0.912025
LoRACoE: Improving Large Language Model via Composition-based LoRA Expert · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
parameter-efficient fine-tuning
0.912025
LoRACoE: Improving Large Language Model via Composition-based LoRA Expert · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation matching › feature alignment › embedding alignment
cross-lingual alignment
0.812024
Unveiling Linguistic Regions in Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.812024
Unveiling Linguistic Regions in Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
multilingual language models
0.812024
Unveiling Linguistic Regions in Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning from human feedback
0.812024
Improving Discriminative Capability of Reward Models in RLHF Using Contrastive Learning · EMNLP 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward learning
reward modeling
0.812024
Improving Discriminative Capability of Reward Models in RLHF Using Contrastive Learning · EMNLP 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model
large language model adaptation
0.312025
LoRACoE: Improving Large Language Model via Composition-based LoRA Expert · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning
catastrophic forgetting
0.212024
Unveiling Linguistic Regions in Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

temporal difference learning · 1.0synthetic benchmark generation · 1.0speaker modeling · 1.0reinforcement learning · 1.0multi-token prediction · 1.0longitudinal study · 1.0generalized advantage estimation · 1.0decoupled tokenization · 1.0dynamic expert routing · 0.9LoRA · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 What Makes a Good Speech Tokenizer for LLM-Centric Speech Generation? A Systematic Study
abstract
Speech-language models (SLMs) offer a promising path toward unifying speech and text understanding and generation. However, challenges remain in achieving effective cross-modal alignment and high-quality speech generation. In this work, we systematically investigate the role of speech tokenizer designs in LLM-centric SLMs, augmented by speech heads and speaker modeling. We compare coupled, semi-decoupled, and fully decoupled speech tokenizers under a fair SLM framework and find that decoupled tokenization significantly improves alignment and synthesis quality. To address the information density mismatch between speech and text, we introduce multi-token prediction (MTP) into SLMs, enabling each hidden state to decode multiple speech tokens. This leads to up to 12× faster decoding and a substantial drop in word error rate (from 6.07 to 3.01). Furthermore, we propose a speaker-aware generation paradigm and introduce RoleTriviaQA, a large-scale role-playing knowledge QA benchmark with diverse speaker identities. Experiments demonstrate that our methods enhance both knowledge understanding and speaker consistency.
Xiaoran Fan, Yangfan Gao, Jingfei Xiong, Hang Yan 0001, Yifei Cao, Zhihao Zhang 0002, Zhiheng Xi, Yuhao Zhou 0005, Senjie Jin, Changhao Jiang, Junjie Ye 0005, Ming Zhang 0030, Zhenhua Han, Yunke Zhang, Demei Yan, Shaokang Dong, Tao Gui
AAAI9
2026 Reasoning or Memorization? Unreliable Results of Reinforcement Learning Due to Data Contamination
abstract
Reasoning in large language models has long been a central research focus, and recent studies employing reinforcement learning (RL) have introduced diverse methods that yield substantial performance gains with minimal or even no external supervision. Surprisingly, some studies even suggest that random or incorrect reward signals can enhance performance. However, these breakthroughs are predominantly observed for the mathematically strong Qwen2.5 series on benchmarks such as MATH-500, AMC, and AIME, and seldom transfer to models like Llama, which warrants a more in-depth investigation. In this work, our empirical analysis reveals that pre-training on massive web-scale corpora leaves Qwen2.5 susceptible to data contamination in widely used benchmarks. Consequently, conclusions derived from contaminated benchmarks on Qwen2.5 series may be unreliable. To obtain trustworthy evaluation results, we introduce a generator that creates fully clean arithmetic problems of arbitrary length and difficulty, dubbed RandomCalculation. Using this leakage-free dataset, we show that only accurate reward signals yield steady improvements that surpass the base model’s performance boundary in mathematical reasoning, whereas random or incorrect rewards do not. Moreover, we conduct more fine-grained analyses to elucidate the factors underlying the different performance observed on the MATH-500 and RandomCalculation benchmarks. Consequently, we recommend that future studies evaluate models on uncontaminated benchmarks and, when feasible, test various model series to ensure trustworthy conclusions about RL and related methods.
Mingqi Wu, Zhihao Zhang 0002, Qiaole Dong, Zhiheng Xi, Jun Zhao 0019, Senjie Jin, Xiaoran Fan, Yuhao Zhou 0005, Huijie Lv, Ming Zhang 0030, Yanwei Fu 0001, Qin Liu 0010, Songyang Zhang 0001, Qi Zhang 0001
AAAI2
2026 AgentGym2: Benchmarking Large Language Model Agents in De-Idealized Real-World Environments
abstract
Zhiheng Xi, Dingwen Yang, Jiaqi Liu, Jixuan Huang, Honglin Guo, Baodai Huang, Tinggang Chen, Qi Zhang, Zhonghang Lu, Chenyu Liu, Jiajun Sun, Jiazheng Zhang, Dingwei Zhu, Xin Guo, Junzhe Wang, Zhihao Zhang, Yuming Yang, Junjie Ye, Minghe Gao, Dongrui Liu, Jiaming Ji, Guohao Li, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
Zhiheng Xi, Dingwen Yang, Jixuan Huang, Honglin Guo, Baodai Huang, Tinggang Chen, Qi Zhang 0001, Zhonghang Lu, Jiazheng Zhang, Dingwei Zhu, Junzhe Wang 0001, Zhihao Zhang 0002, Yuming Yang 0001, Junjie Ye 0005, Minghe Gao, Dongrui Liu, Jiaming Ji, Tao Gui, Xuanjing Huang 0001
ACL (1)16
2026 LLMEval-Fair: A Large-Scale Longitudinal Study on Robust and Fair Evaluation of Large Language Models
abstract
Ming Zhang, Yujiong Shen, Jingyi Deng, Yuhui Wang, Huayu Sha, Kexin Tan, Qiyuan Peng, Yue Zhang, Junzhe Wang, Shichun Liu, Yueyuan Huang, Jingqi Tong, Changhao Jiang, Yilong Wu, Zhihao Zhang, Mingqi Wu, Mingxu Chai, Zhiheng Xi, Shihan Dou, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
Ming Zhang 0030, Yujiong Shen, Jingyi Deng, Huayu Sha, Kexin Tan, Qiyuan Peng, Yue Zhang 0004, Junzhe Wang 0001, Shichun Liu, Yueyuan Huang, Jingqi Tong, Changhao Jiang, Yilong Wu, Zhihao Zhang 0002, Mingqi Wu, Mingxu Chai, Zhiheng Xi, Shihan Dou, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang 0001, Xuanjing Huang 0001
ACL (1)15
2026 AgentPRM: Process Reward Models for LLM Agents via Step-Wise Promise and Progress
abstract
Despite rapid development, large language models (LLMs) still encounter challenges in multi-turn decision-making tasks (i.e., agent tasks) like web shopping and browser navigation, which require making a sequence of intelligent decisions based on environmental feedback. Previous work for LLM agents typically relies on elaborate prompt engineering or fine-tuning with expert trajectories to improve performance. In this work, we take a different perspective: we explore constructing process reward models (PRMs) to evaluate each decision and guide the agent's decision-making process. Unlike LLM reasoning, where each step is scored based on correctness, actions in agent tasks do not have a clear-cut correctness. Instead, they should be evaluated based on their proximity to the goal and the progress they have made. Building on this insight, we propose a re-defined PRM for agent tasks, named AgentPRM, to capture both the interdependence between sequential decisions and their contribution to the final goal. This enables better progress tracking and exploration-exploitation balance. To scalably obtain labeled data for training AgentPRM, we employ a Temporal Difference-based (TD-based) estimation method combined with Generalized Advantage Estimation (GAE), which proves more sample-efficient than prior methods. Extensive experiments across different agentic tasks show that AgentPRM is over 8× more compute-efficient than baselines, and it demonstrates robust improvement when scaling up test-time compute. Moreover, we perform detailed analyses to show how our method works and offer more insights, e.g., applying AgentPRM to the reinforcement learning of LLM agents.
Zhiheng Xi, Chenyang Liao, Zhihao Zhang 0002, Wenxiang Chen, Binghai Wang, Senjie Jin, Yuhao Zhou 0005, Jian Guan 0002, Wei Wu 0014, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang 0001, Xuanjing Huang 0001
WWW4
2025 LoRACoE: Improving Large Language Model via Composition-based LoRA Expert
abstract
The Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture improves large language models (LLMs) by utilizing sparsely activated expert sub-networks with a routing module, yet it typically demands high training cost.Previous work introduces parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) modules, e.g., LoRA, to achieve a lightweight MoE for efficiency.However, they construct static experts by manually splitting the LoRA parameters into fixed groups, which limits flexibility and dynamism.Furthermore, this manual partitioning also hinders the effective utilization of well-initialized LoRA modules.To tackl the challenges, we first delve into the parameter patterns in LoRA modules, revealing that there exists task-relevant parameters that are concentrated along the rank dimension.Based on this, we redesign the construction of experts and propose the LoRACoE (LoRA Composition of Experts) method.Specifically, when confronted with a task, it dynamically builds experts based on rank-level parameter composition, i.e., experts can flexibly combine rank-level parameters in LoRA module.Extensive experiments demonstrate that compared to other LoRA-based MoE methods, our method achieves better task performance across a broader range of tasks.
Zhiheng Xi, Zhihao Zhang 0002, Boyang Hong, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang 0001, Xuanjing Huang 0001
EMNLP3
2024 Unveiling Linguistic Regions in Large Language Models
abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated considerable cross-lingual alignment and generalization ability.Current research primarily focuses on improving LLMs' crosslingual generalization capabilities.However, there is still a lack of research on the intrinsic mechanisms of how LLMs achieve crosslingual alignment.From the perspective of region partitioning, this paper conducts several investigations on the linguistic competence of LLMs.We discover a core region in LLMs that corresponds to linguistic competence, accounting for approximately 1% of the total model parameters.Removing this core region by setting parameters to zero results in a significant performance decrease across 30 different languages.Furthermore, this core region exhibits significant dimensional dependence, perturbations to even a single parameter on specific dimensions leading to a loss of linguistic competence.Moreover, we discover that distinct monolingual regions exist for different languages, and disruption to these specific regions substantially reduces the LLMs' proficiency in those corresponding languages.Our research also indicates that freezing the core linguistic region during further pre-training can mitigate the issue of catastrophic forgetting (CF), a common phenomenon observed during further pre-training of LLMs.Overall, exploring the LLMs' functional regions provides insights into the foundation of their intelligence 1 . * Equal contributions.† Corresponding authors. 1 Our code is released in https://github.com/ zzhang0179/Unveiling-Linguistic-Regions-in-LLMs.
Zhihao Zhang 0002, Jun Zhao 0019, Qi Zhang 0001, Tao Gui, Xuanjing Huang 0001
ACL (1)1
2024 Improving Discriminative Capability of Reward Models in RLHF Using Contrastive Learning
abstract
Lu Chen, Rui Zheng, Binghai Wang, Senjie Jin, Caishuang Huang, Junjie Ye, Zhihao Zhang, Yuhao Zhou, Zhiheng Xi, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2024.
Lu Chen 0001, Binghai Wang, Senjie Jin, Caishuang Huang, Junjie Ye 0005, Zhihao Zhang 0002, Yuhao Zhou 0005, Zhiheng Xi, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang 0001, Xuanjing Huang 0001
EMNLP7