Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Pawel Gancarski
dblp:91/7450
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
0000-0001-9198-8429ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Programming languages and type systems · 87% Requirements engineering and software design · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Programming languages and type systems › language semantics › formal semantics
denotational semantics |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | The Denotational Semantics of slotted-Circus · FM 2009 |
Programming languages and type systems › language semantics
formal semantics |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | The Denotational Semantics of slotted-Circus · FM 2009 |
Requirements engineering and software design › formal specification
circus |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | The Denotational Semantics of slotted-Circus · FM 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
slotted-circus · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | Prioritized slotted-Circus
Pawel Gancarski, Andrew Butterfield |
ICTAC | 1 |
| 2009 | The Denotational Semantics of slotted-Circus
Pawel Gancarski, Andrew Butterfield |
FM | 1 |
| 2009 | State Visibility and Communication in Unifying Theories of ProgrammingabstractWe explore the interactions between program-variable state visibility and communication behaviour in state-rich CSP-like processes, using the Unifying Theories of Programming (UTP) framework. The key results of this work are: having variable state visible while a process is waiting to communicate, results in an operationally complex theory of behaviour; by contrast, considering state as unobservable during communication wait periods results in an elegant theory, with much cleaner operational intuitions. The language constructs most affected by this observability choice are those of external choice and parallel composition. We also discuss situations where this state hiding can prevent the adoption of interesting operators that seize control from waiting processes. Andrew Butterfield, Pawel Gancarski, Jim Woodcock 0001 |
TASE | 2 |