Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ugo Scaiella

dblp:91/8263 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data mining · 52% Information retrieval · 26% Knowledge graphs · 17%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge graphs
entity linking
0.212016
Sedano: A News Stream Processor for Business · SIGIR 2016
Data mining › text mining
information extraction
0.212016
Sedano: A News Stream Processor for Business · SIGIR 2016
Data mining › text mining
text classification
0.212016
Sedano: A News Stream Processor for Business · SIGIR 2016
Data mining › clustering › interpretable clustering
cluster labeling
0.112012
Topical clustering of search results · WSDM 2012
Information retrieval › search engines
search result clustering
0.112012
Topical clustering of search results · WSDM 2012
Data mining › clustering › document clustering
topical clustering
0.112012
Topical clustering of search results · WSDM 2012
Algorithms and data structures
clustering
0.012012
Topical clustering of search results · WSDM 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

clustering · 0.3text classification · 0.2entity linking · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Sedano: A News Stream Processor for Business
abstract
We present Sedano, a system for processing and indexing a continuous stream of business-related news. Sedano defines pipelines whose stages analyze and enrich news items (e.g., newspaper articles and press releases). News data coming from several content sources are stored, processed and then indexed in order to be consumed by Atoka, our business intelligence product. Atoka users can retrieve news about specific companies, filtering according to various facets. Sedano features both an entity-linking phase, which finds mentions of companies in news, and a classification phase, which classifies news according to a set of business events. Its flexible architecture allows Sedano to be deployed on commodity machines while being scalable and fault-tolerant
Ugo Scaiella, Giacomo Berardi, Giuliano Mega, Roberto Santoro 0002
SIGIR1
2012 Classification of Short Texts by Deploying Topical Annotations
Daniele Vitale, Paolo Ferragina, Ugo Scaiella
ECIR3
2012 Topical clustering of search results
abstract
Search results clustering (SRC) is a challenging algorithmic problem that requires grouping together the results returned by one or more search engines in topically coherent clusters, and labeling the clusters with meaningful phrases describing the topics of the results included in them.
Ugo Scaiella, Paolo Ferragina, Andrea Marino 0001, Massimiliano Ciaramita
WSDM1
2010 TAGME: on-the-fly annotation of short text fragments (by wikipedia entities)
abstract
We designed and implemented TAGME, a system that is able to efficiently and judiciously augment a plain-text with pertinent hyperlinks to Wikipedia pages. The specialty of TAGME with respect to known systems [5,8] is that it may annotate texts which are short and poorly composed, such as snippets of search-engine results, tweets, news, etc.. This annotation is extremely informative, so any task that is currently addressed using the bag-of-words paradigm could benefit from using this annotation to draw upon (the millions of) Wikipedia pages and their inter-relations.
Paolo Ferragina, Ugo Scaiella
CIKM2