EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ofer Meshi
dblp:91/8411
· DBLP profile ↗
25ranked-venue papers
10as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0005-3418-8771ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 24 · 10 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
11 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 46% Reinforcement learning · 19% Optimization for machine learning · 14% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
5 papers |
Recommender systems · 51% Information retrieval · 40% Machine learning and data management · 7% | |
| Theoretical computer science
5 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 70% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 30% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Parallel and multicore computing · 100% |
Topics — the 30 heaviest of 38, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
MAP inference |
1.0 | 4 | 2019 | Train and Test Tightness of LP Relaxations in Structured Prediction · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2019 Asynchronous Parallel Coordinate Minimization for MAP Inference · NIPS 2017 Smooth and Strong: MAP Inference with Linear Convergence · NIPS 2015 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
structured prediction |
0.8 | 3 | 2019 | Train and Test Tightness of LP Relaxations in Structured Prediction · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2019 Deep Structured Prediction with Nonlinear Output Transformations · NeurIPS 2018 More data means less inference: A pseudo-max approach to structured learning · NIPS 2010 |
Recommender systems › recommender system evaluation
off-policy evaluation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Minimizing Live Experiments in Recommender Systems: User Simulation to Evaluate Preference Elicitation Policies · SIGIR 2024 |
Information retrieval
personalized search |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Density-based User Representation using Gaussian Process Regression for Multi-interest Personalized Retrieval · NeurIPS 2024 |
Recommender systems
user modeling |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Density-based User Representation using Gaussian Process Regression for Multi-interest Personalized Retrieval · NeurIPS 2024 |
Information retrieval › evaluation
user simulation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Minimizing Live Experiments in Recommender Systems: User Simulation to Evaluate Preference Elicitation Policies · SIGIR 2024 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
preference elicitation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Model-Free Preference Elicitation · IJCAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
markov decision process |
0.6 | 2 | 2018 | Planning and Learning with Stochastic Action Sets · IJCAI 2018 Logistic Markov Decision Processes · IJCAI 2017 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › convex relaxation
linear programming relaxation |
0.6 | 2 | 2019 | Train and Test Tightness of LP Relaxations in Structured Prediction · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2019 Smooth and Strong: MAP Inference with Linear Convergence · NIPS 2015 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models |
0.5 | 2 | 2018 | Deep Structured Prediction with Nonlinear Output Transformations · NeurIPS 2018 Convergence Rate Analysis of MAP Coordinate Minimization Algorithms · NIPS 2012 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Train and Test Tightness of LP Relaxations in Structured Prediction · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2019 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical learning theory |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Train and Test Tightness of LP Relaxations in Structured Prediction · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2019 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › hierarchical reinforcement learning
temporal abstraction |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Advantage Amplification in Slowly Evolving Latent-State Environments · IJCAI 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural network inference
DNN inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Deep Structured Prediction with Nonlinear Output Transformations · NeurIPS 2018 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty › probabilistic planning
markov decision process planning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Planning and Learning with Stochastic Action Sets · IJCAI 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured prediction
structured prediction energy network |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Deep Structured Prediction with Nonlinear Output Transformations · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
dual decomposition |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Asynchronous Parallel Coordinate Minimization for MAP Inference · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › bayesian network
dynamic bayesian network |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Logistic Markov Decision Processes · IJCAI 2017 |
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel computing › parallel optimization
asynchronous parallel optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Asynchronous Parallel Coordinate Minimization for MAP Inference · NIPS 2017 |
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel algorithms |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Asynchronous Parallel Coordinate Minimization for MAP Inference · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning and data management
structured prediction |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Train and Test Tightness of LP Relaxations in Structured Prediction · ICML 2016 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › first-order methods
conditional gradient method |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Linear-Memory and Decomposition-Invariant Linearly Convergent Conditional Gradient Algorithm for Structured Polytopes · NIPS 2016 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Linear-Memory and Decomposition-Invariant Linearly Convergent Conditional Gradient Algorithm for Structured Polytopes · NIPS 2016 |
Mathematical optimization
integer programming |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Train and Test Tightness of LP Relaxations in Structured Prediction · ICML 2016 |
Mathematical optimization › convergence analysis
linear convergence |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Linear-Memory and Decomposition-Invariant Linearly Convergent Conditional Gradient Algorithm for Structured Polytopes · NIPS 2016 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
approximate inference |
0.2 | 2 | 2010 | FastInf: An Efficient Approximate Inference Library · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2010 Learning Efficiently with Approximate Inference via Dual Losses · ICML 2010 |
Mathematical optimization
continuous optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Smooth and Strong: MAP Inference with Linear Convergence · NIPS 2015 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization
strongly convex optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Smooth and Strong: MAP Inference with Linear Convergence · NIPS 2015 |
Recommender systems
sequential recommendation |
0.2 | 2 | 2019 | Advantage Amplification in Slowly Evolving Latent-State Environments · IJCAI 2019 Logistic Markov Decision Processes · IJCAI 2017 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › first-order methods
coordinate descent |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Convergence Rate Analysis of MAP Coordinate Minimization Algorithms · NIPS 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
LP relaxation · 0.9integer linear programming · 0.9coordinate minimization · 0.9user behavior modeling · 0.8uncertainty modeling · 0.8option aggregation · 0.8gaussian process regression · 0.8advantage amplification · 0.8generalization analysis · 0.5value iteration · 0.3q-learning · 0.3policy iteration · 0.3linear programming · 0.3energy-based model · 0.3logistic regression · 0.3dual decomposition · 0.3constraint generation · 0.3approximate linear programming · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Model-Free Preference Elicitation
Carlos Martin 0001, Craig Boutilier, Ofer Meshi, Tuomas Sandholm |
IJCAI | 3 |
| 2024 | Density-based User Representation using Gaussian Process Regression for Multi-interest Personalized RetrievalabstractAccurate modeling of the diverse and dynamic interests of users remains a significant challenge in the design of personalized recommender systems. Existing user modeling methods, like single-point and multi-point representations, have limitations w.r.t.\ accuracy, diversity, and adaptability. To overcome these deficiencies, we introduce density-based user representations (DURs), a novel method that leverages Gaussian process regression (GPR) for effective multi-interest recommendation and retrieval. Our approach, GPR4DUR, exploits DURs to capture user interest variability without manual tuning, incorporates uncertainty-awareness, and scales well to large numbers of users. Experiments using real-world offline datasets confirm the adaptability and efficiency of GPR4DUR, while online experiments with simulated users demonstrate its ability to address the exploration-exploitation trade-off by effectively utilizing model uncertainty. Haolun Wu, Ofer Meshi, Masrour Zoghi, Fernando Diaz 0001, Xue (Steve) Liu, Craig Boutilier, Maryam Karimzadehgan |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2024 | Minimizing Live Experiments in Recommender Systems: User Simulation to Evaluate Preference Elicitation PoliciesabstractEvaluation of policies in recommender systems typically involves A/B live experiments on real users to assess a new policy's impact on relevant metrics. This "gold standard'' comes at a high cost, however, in terms of cycle time, user cost, and potential user retention. In developing policies for onboarding users, these costs can be especially problematic, since on-boarding occurs only once. In this work, we describe a simulation methodology used to augment (and reduce) the use of live experiments. We illustrate its deployment for the evaluation of preference elicitation algorithms used to onboard new users of the YouTube Music platform. By developing counterfactually robust user behavior models, and a simulation service that couples such models with production infrastructure, we can test new algorithms in a way that reliably predicts their performance on key metrics when deployed live. Martin Mladenov, Ofer Meshi, James Pine, Hubert Pham, Shane Li, Xujian Liang, Anton Polishko, Li Yang 0030, Ben Scheetz, Craig Boutilier |
SIGIR | 3 |
| 2023 | Overcoming Prior Misspecification in Online Learning to RankabstractThe recent literature on online learning to rank (LTR) has established the utility of prior knowledge to Bayesian ranking bandit algorithms. However, a major limitation of existing work is the requirement for the prior used by the algorithm to match the true prior. In this paper, we propose and analyze adaptive algorithms that address this issue and additionally extend these results to the linear and generalized linear models. We also consider scalar relevance feedback on top of click feedback. Moreover, we demonstrate the efficacy of our algorithms using both synthetic and real-world experiments. Javad Azizi, Ofer Meshi, Masrour Zoghi, Maryam Karimzadehgan |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2022 | On the Value of Prior in Online Learning to RankabstractThis paper addresses the cold-start problem in online learning to rank (OLTR). We show both theoretically and empirically that priors improve the quality of ranked lists presented to users interactively based on user feedback. These priors can come in the form of unbiased estimates of the relevance of the ranked items, or more practically, can be obtained from offline-learned models. Our experiments show the effectiveness of priors in improving the short-term regret of tabular OLTR algorithms, based on Thompson sampling and BayesUCB. Branislav Kveton, Ofer Meshi, Masrour Zoghi |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2019 | Advantage Amplification in Slowly Evolving Latent-State EnvironmentsabstractLatent-state environments with long horizons, such as those faced by recommender systems, pose significant challenges for reinforcement learning (RL). In this work, we identify and analyze several key hurdles for RL in such environments, including belief state error and small action advantage. We develop a general principle called advantage amplification that an overcome these hurdles through the use of temporal abstraction. We propose several aggregation methods and prove they induce amplification in certain settings. We also bound the loss in optimality incurred by our methods in environments where latent state evolves slowly and demonstrate their performance empirically in a stylized user-modeling task. Martin Mladenov, Ofer Meshi, Jayden Ooi, Dale Schuurmans, Craig Boutilier |
IJCAI | 2 |
| 2019 | Train and Test Tightness of LP Relaxations in Structured PredictionabstractStructured prediction is used in areas including computer vision and natural language processing to predict structured outputs such as segmentations or parse trees. In these settings, prediction is performed by MAP inference or, equivalently, by solving an integer linear program. Because of the complex scoring functions required to obtain accurate predictions, both learning and inference typically require the use of approximate solvers. We propose a theoretical explanation for the striking observation that approximations based on linear programming (LP) relaxations are often tight (exact) on real-world instances. In particular, we show that learning with LP relaxed inference encourages integrality of training instances, and that this training tightness generalizes to test data. Ofer Meshi, Ben London 0001, Adrian Weller, David A. Sontag |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2018 | Planning and Learning with Stochastic Action SetsabstractIn many practical uses of reinforcement learning (RL) the set of actions available at a given state is a random variable, with realizations governed by an exogenous stochastic process. Somewhat surprisingly, the foundations for such sequential decision processes have been unaddressed. In this work, we formalize and investigate MDPs with stochastic action sets (SAS-MDPs) to provide these foundations. We show that optimal policies and value functions in this model have a structure that admits a compact representation. From an RL perspective, we show that Q-learning with sampled action sets is sound. In model-based settings, we consider two important special cases: when individual actions are available with independent probabilities, and a sampling-based model for unknown distributions. We develop polynomial-time value and policy iteration methods for both cases, and provide a polynomial-time linear programming solution for the first case. Craig Boutilier, Alon Cohen, Avinatan Hassidim, Yishay Mansour, Ofer Meshi, Martin Mladenov, Dale Schuurmans |
IJCAI | 5 |
| 2018 | Deep Structured Prediction with Nonlinear Output TransformationsabstractDeep structured models are widely used for tasks like semantic segmentation, where explicit correlations between variables provide important prior information which generally helps to reduce the data needs of deep nets. However, current deep structured models are restricted by oftentimes very local neighborhood structure, which cannot be increased for computational complexity reasons, and by the fact that the output configuration, or a representation thereof, cannot be transformed further. Very recent approaches which address those issues include graphical model inference inside deep nets so as to permit subsequent non-linear output space transformations. However, optimization of those formulations is challenging and not well understood. Here, we develop a novel model which generalizes existing approaches, such as structured prediction energy networks, and discuss a formulation which maintains applicability of existing inference techniques. Colin Graber, Ofer Meshi, Alexander G. Schwing |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2017 | Logistic Markov Decision ProcessesabstractUser modeling in advertising and recommendation has typically focused on myopic predictors of user responses. In this work, we consider the long-term decision problem associated with user interaction. We propose a concise specification of long-term interaction dynamics by combining factored dynamic Bayesian networks with logistic predictors of user responses, allowing state-of-the-art prediction models to be seamlessly extended. We show how to solve such models at scale by providing a constraint generation approach for approximate linear programming that overcomes the variable coupling and non-linearity induced by the logistic regression predictor. The efficacy of the approach is demonstrated on advertising domains with up to 2^54 states and 2^39 actions. Martin Mladenov, Craig Boutilier, Dale Schuurmans, Ofer Meshi, Gal Elidan, Tyler Lu |
IJCAI | 4 |
| 2017 | Asynchronous Parallel Coordinate Minimization for MAP InferenceabstractFinding the maximum a-posteriori (MAP) assignment is a central task in graphical models. Since modern applications give rise to very large problem instances, there is increasing need for efficient solvers. In this work we propose to improve the efficiency of coordinate-minimization-based dual-decomposition solvers by running their updates asynchronously in parallel. In this case message-passing inference is performed by multiple processing units simultaneously without coordination, all reading and writing to shared memory. We analyze the convergence properties of the resulting algorithms and identify settings where speedup gains can be expected. Our numerical evaluations show that this approach indeed achieves significant speedups in common computer vision tasks. Ofer Meshi, Alexander G. Schwing |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2016 | Fast and Scalable Structural SVM with Slack RescalingabstractWe present an efficient method for training slack-rescaled structural SVM. Although finding the most violating label in a margin-rescaled formulation is often easy since the target function decomposes with respect to the structure, this is not the case for a slack-rescaled formulation, and finding the most violated label might be very difficult. Our core contribution is an efficient method for finding the most-violating-label in a slack-rescaled formulation, given an oracle that returns the most-violating-label in a (slightly modified) margin-rescaled formulation. We show that our method enables accurate and scalable training for slack-rescaled SVMs, reducing runtime by an order of magnitude compared to previous approaches to slack-rescaled SVMs. Heejin Choi, Ofer Meshi, Nathan Srebro |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2016 | Train and Test Tightness of LP Relaxations in Structured PredictionabstractStructured prediction is used in areas such as computer vision and natural language processing to predict structured outputs such as segmentations or parse trees. In these settings, prediction is performed by MAP inference or, equivalently, by solving an integer linear program. Because of the complex scoring functions required to obtain accurate predictions, both learning and inference typically require the use of approximate solvers. We propose a theoretical explanation to the striking observation that approximations based on linear programming (LP) relaxations are often tight on real-world instances. In particular, we show that learning with LP relaxed inference encourages integrality of training instances, and that tightness generalizes from train to test data. Ofer Meshi, Mehrdad Mahdavi, Adrian Weller, David A. Sontag |
ICML | 1 |
| 2016 | Linear-Memory and Decomposition-Invariant Linearly Convergent Conditional Gradient Algorithm for Structured PolytopesabstractRecently, several works have shown that natural modifications of the classical conditional gradient method (aka Frank-Wolfe algorithm) for constrained convex optimization, provably converge with a linear rate when the feasible set is a polytope, and the objective is smooth and strongly-convex. However, all of these results suffer from two significant shortcomings: i) large memory requirement due to the need to store an explicit convex decomposition of the current iterate, and as a consequence, large running-time overhead per iteration ii) the worst case convergence rate depends unfavorably on the dimension In this work we present a new conditional gradient variant and a corresponding analysis that improves on both of the above shortcomings. In particular, both memory and computation overheads are only linear in the dimension, and in addition, in case the optimal solution is sparse, the new convergence rate replaces a factor which is at least linear in the dimension in previous works, with a linear dependence on the number of non-zeros in the optimal solution At the heart of our method, and corresponding analysis, is a novel way to compute decomposition-invariant away-steps. While our theoretical guarantees do not apply to any polytope, they apply to several important structured polytopes that capture central concepts such as paths in graphs, perfect matchings in bipartite graphs, marginal distributions that arise in structured prediction tasks, and more. Our theoretical findings are complemented by empirical evidence that shows that our method delivers state-of-the-art performance. Dan Garber, Ofer Meshi |
NIPS | 2 |
| 2015 | Efficient Training of Structured SVMs via Soft ConstraintsabstractStructured output prediction is a powerful framework for jointly predicting interdependent output labels. Learning the parameters of structured predictors is a central task in machine learning applications. However, training the model from data often becomes computationally expensive. Several methods have been proposed to exploit the model structure, or decomposition, in order to obtain efficient training algorithms. In particular, methods based on linear programming relaxation, or dual decomposition, decompose the prediction task into multiple simpler prediction tasks and enforce agreement between overlapping predictions. In this work we observe that relaxing these agreement constraints and replacing them with soft constraints yields a much easier optimization problem. Based on this insight we propose an alternative training objective, analyze its theoretical properties, and derive an algorithm for its optimization. Our method, based on the Frank-Wolfe algorithm, achieves significant speedups over existing state-of-the-art methods without hurting prediction accuracy. Ofer Meshi, Nathan Srebro, Tamir Hazan |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2015 | Smooth and Strong: MAP Inference with Linear ConvergenceabstractMaximum a-posteriori (MAP) inference is an important task for many applications. Although the standard formulation gives rise to a hard combinatorial optimization problem, several effective approximations have been proposed and studied in recent years. We focus on linear programming (LP) relaxations, which have achieved state-of-the-art performance in many applications. However, optimization of the resulting program is in general challenging due to non-smoothness and complex non-separable constraints.Therefore, in this work we study the benefits of augmenting the objective function of the relaxation with strong convexity. Specifically, we introduce strong convexity by adding a quadratic term to the LP relaxation objective. We provide theoretical guarantees for the resulting programs, bounding the difference between their optimal value and the original optimum. Further, we propose suitable optimization algorithms and analyze their convergence. Ofer Meshi, Mehrdad Mahdavi, Alexander G. Schwing |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2014 | Learning Structured Models with the AUC Loss and Its GeneralizationsabstractMany problems involve the prediction of multiple, possibly dependent labels. The structured output prediction framework builds predictors that take these dependencies into account and use them to improve accuracy. In many such tasks, performance is evaluated by the Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC). While a framework for optimizing the AUC loss for unstructured models exists, it does not naturally extend to structured models. In this work, we propose a representation and learning formulation for optimizing structured models over the AUC loss, show how our approach generalizes the unstructured case, and provide algorithms for solving the resulting inference and learning problems. We also explore several new variants of the AUC measure which naturally arise from our formulation. Finally, we empirically show the utility of our approach in several domains. Nir Rosenfeld, Ofer Meshi, Daniel Tarlow, Amir Globerson |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2013 | Learning Max-Margin Tree Predictors
Ofer Meshi, Elad Eban, Gal Elidan, Amir Globerson |
UAI | 1 |
| 2012 | Convergence Rate Analysis of MAP Coordinate Minimization AlgorithmsabstractFinding maximum aposteriori (MAP) assignments in graphical models is an important task in many applications. Since the problem is generally hard, linear programming (LP) relaxations are often used. Solving these relaxations efficiently is thus an important practical problem. In recent years, several authors have proposed message passing updates corresponding to coordinate descent in the dual LP. However,these are generally not guaranteed to converge to a global optimum. One approach to remedy this is to smooth the LP, and perform coordinate descent on the smoothed dual. However, little is known about the convergence rate of this procedure. Here we perform a thorough rate analysis of such schemes and derive primal and dual convergence rates. We also provide a simple dual to primal mapping that yields feasible primal solutions with a guaranteed rate of convergence. Empirical evaluation supports our theoretical claims and shows that the method is highly competitive with state of the art approaches that yield global optima. Ofer Meshi, Tommi S. Jaakkola, Amir Globerson |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2011 | An Alternating Direction Method for Dual MAP LP Relaxation
Ofer Meshi, Amir Globerson |
ECML/PKDD (2) | 1 |
| 2010 | Learning Efficiently with Approximate Inference via Dual Losses
Ofer Meshi, David A. Sontag, Tommi S. Jaakkola, Amir Globerson |
ICML | 1 |
| 2010 | More data means less inference: A pseudo-max approach to structured learningabstractThe problem of learning to predict structured labels is of key importance in many applications. However, for general graph structure both learning and inference in this setting are intractable. Here we show that it is possible to circumvent this difficulty when the input distribution is rich enough via a method similar in spirit to pseudo-likelihood. We show how our new method achieves consistency, and illustrate empirically that it indeed performs as well as exact methods when sufficiently large training sets are used. David A. Sontag, Ofer Meshi, Tommi S. Jaakkola, Amir Globerson |
NIPS | 2 |
| 2010 | FastInf: An Efficient Approximate Inference Library
Ariel Jaimovich, Ofer Meshi, Ian McGraw, Gal Elidan |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2009 | Convexifying the Bethe Free Energy
Ofer Meshi, Ariel Jaimovich, Amir Globerson, Nir Friedman |
UAI | 1 |
| 2007 | Template Based Inference in Symmetric Relational Markov Random Fields
Ariel Jaimovich, Ofer Meshi, Nir Friedman |
UAI | 2 |