Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Maud Vinet

dblp:91/9850 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 3Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Integrated circuit design · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Integrated circuit design
heterogeneous integration
0.112009
System on Wafer: A New Silicon Concept in SiP · Proc. IEEE 2009
Integrated circuit design
packaging
0.112009
System on Wafer: A New Silicon Concept in SiP · Proc. IEEE 2009
Integrated circuit design › 3d integration
through-silicon via
0.012009
System on Wafer: A New Silicon Concept in SiP · Proc. IEEE 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

passive component integration · 0.1flip chip · 0.1MEMS packaging · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 A comprehensive study of monolithic 3D cell on cell design using commercial 2D tool
Olivier Billoint, Hossam Sarhan, Iyad Rayane, Maud Vinet, Perrine Batude, Claire Fenouillet-Béranger, Olivier Rozeau, Gerald Cibrario, Fabien Deprat, A. Fustier, Julien Michallet, Olivier Faynot, Ogun Turkyilmaz, Jean-Frédéric Christmann, Sébastien Thuries, Fabien Clermidy
DATE4
2015 From 2D to Monolithic 3D: Design Possibilities, Expectations and Challenges
abstract
Design of conventional 2D integrated circuits is becoming more and more challenging as we strive to keep on following Moore's law. Cost, thermal behavior, multiple patterning, increasing number of design rules, transistor characteristics, variability and back end properties coupled with a constant need for a higher integration of functions / peripherals are creating an increasingly complex equation to solve for designers. Moving to the next node and taking advantage of the technology are now far from being straightforward as time to market has never been so short for industry. In order to overcome or at least postpone the time when we'll have to face the "next node migration constraints", a possible solution could be staying at the same node and go 3D with possible benefits such as wire length reduction, power savings and increased operating frequency. Since more than ten years now, interconnect technologies like Through Silicon Via (TSV), High Density (HD)-TSV and Copper to Copper (Cu-Cu) have arisen to take advantage of this possible 3-dimensional physical implementation with proofs of concept [1] or more recently industrial products [2]. Main drawback of these technologies is that they are not shrinking at the same speed as transistors are, making them somehow power hungry; moreover the more they will shrink, the more precision will be needed for chip to chip alignment. To reach the highest possible standard cell and tier to tier interconnect densities required for cost-effective chips, 3D sequential integration process [3][4][5] (also known as Monolithic 3D or CoolCubeTM) is currently developed with main features being sequential fabrication of MOS layers and correlation of tier to tier interconnect size with process node allowing fine-grain 3D partitioning of designs. These particularities make it a durable opportunity to slow down next node design migration while still improving integration. To fully benefit from CoolCubeTM technology, a whole new way of designing circuits, from synthesis to place and route, will be required as some new challenges will arise. The point of this presentation is to show the possible use and limitations of the aforementioned technologies with a focus on Monolithic 3D and to give some insights about market expectations, challenges and available design techniques.
Olivier Billoint, Hossam Sarhan, Iyad Rayane, Maud Vinet, Perrine Batude, Claire Fenouillet-Béranger, Olivier Rozeau, Gerald Cibrario, Fabien Deprat, Ogun Turkyilmaz, Sébastien Thuries, Fabien Clermidy
ISPD4
2011 3D monolithic integration
abstract
3D monolithic integration, thanks to its high vertical density of interconnections, is the only available option for applications requiring connections at the transistor scale. However to achieve 3D monolithic integration, some issues such as realization of high quality top film, high stability bottom FET, low thermal budget top FET still have to be solved. In this work, a 3D monolithic process flow relying on molecular wafer bonding is proposed and results in all critical steps are given. Significant breakthroughs have been obtained using a full wafer molecular bonding with thin interlayer dielectric and an original salicidation process stabilized up to 650°C enabling to reach high performance for the top and bottom transistor. With such technology, we demonstrate functional top and bottom transistors as well as 3D structures such as invertors and SRAMs.
Perrine Batude, Maud Vinet, Arnaud Pouydebasque, Cyrille Le Royer, Bernard Previtali, Claude Tabone, Jean-Michel Hartmann, Loïc Sanchez, Laurence Baud, Veronique Carron, Alain Toffoli, Fabienne Allain, Vincent Mazzocchi, Dominique Lafond, Simon Deleonibus, Olivier Faynot
ISCAS2
2009 System on Wafer: A New Silicon Concept in SiP
abstract
System integration is clearly a driving force for innovation in packaging. The need for miniaturization has led to new architectures that combine disparate technologies and materials. Today several different approaches have been developed. These include technologies like system in package. In this way, a new concept for heterogeneous integration is currently being developed at CEA-LETI and is called system on wafer (SoW). This concept is based on a chip to wafer approach. Every component is achieved by using wafer-level technologies, and the final system is performed by single component mounting on a silicon substrate. The main strength of this approach is to use silicon as a substrate for components and for basic support. To perform the SoW, a generic technological toolbox is needed. This includes every standard packaging technology such as flip chip, signal rerouting, and passive component integration as well as new advanced technologies such as microelectromechanical systems packaging, advanced interconnections, energy source integration, integrated cooling, or silicon through vias. In this paper, the SoW concept will be presented and the generic toolbox for SoW achievement will be described.
Gilles Poupon, Nicolas Sillon, Charlotte Gillot, Alan Mathewson, Léa Di Cioccio, Barbara Charlet, Patrick Leduc, Maud Vinet, Perrine Batude
Proc. IEEE9