EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Manchun Zheng
dblp:92/10310
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 7 · 4 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
3 papers |
Concurrent programming · 48% Program verification · 46% Program analysis · 6% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Internet of things and sensor networks · 50% Network management and operations · 50% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Parallel and multicore computing · 64% Embedded and real-time systems · 36% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Concurrent programming
concurrency models |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | CIVL: the concurrency intermediate verification language · SC 2015 |
Concurrent programming
concurrency verification |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | CIVL: the concurrency intermediate verification language · SC 2015 |
Program verification
concurrent program verification |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | CIVL: Formal Verification of Parallel Programs · ASE 2015 |
Program verification › deductive verification
intermediate verification language |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | CIVL: the concurrency intermediate verification language · SC 2015 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
model checking |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | USMMC: a self-contained model checker for UML state machines · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2013 |
Network management and operations
protocol verification |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Towards bug-free implementation for wireless sensor networks · SenSys 2011 |
Internet of things and sensor networks
wireless sensor network |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Towards bug-free implementation for wireless sensor networks · SenSys 2011 |
Concurrent programming
concurrency analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | CIVL: Formal Verification of Parallel Programs · ASE 2015 |
Program analysis
static analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | CIVL: Formal Verification of Parallel Programs · ASE 2015 |
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel programming models |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | CIVL: the concurrency intermediate verification language · SC 2015 |
Embedded and real-time systems
cyber-physical system platforms |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Towards bug-free implementation for wireless sensor networks · SenSys 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
intermediate verification language · 0.7linear temporal logic model checking · 0.4deadlock detection · 0.4simulation · 0.3model checking · 0.3translator · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | CIVL: Applying a General Concurrency Verification Framework to C/Pthreads Programs (Competition Contribution)
Manchun Zheng, John G. Edenhofner, Ziqing Luo, Mitchell J. Gerrard, Michael S. Rogers, Matthew B. Dwyer, Stephen F. Siegel |
TACAS | 1 |
| 2015 | CIVL: Formal Verification of Parallel ProgramsabstractCIVL is a framework for static analysis and verification of concurrent programs. One of the main challenges to practical application of these techniques is the large number of ways to express concurrency: MPI, OpenMP, CUDA, and Pthreads, for example, are just a few of many "concurrency dialects" in wide use today. These dialects are constantly evolving and it is increasingly common to use several of them in a single "hybrid" program. CIVL addresses these problems by providing a concurrency intermediate verification language, CIVL-C, as well as translators that consume C programs using these dialects and produce CIVL-C. Analysis and verification tools which operate on CIVL-C can then be applied easily to a wide variety of concurrent C programs. We demonstrate CIVL's error detection and verification capabilities on (1) an MPI+OpenMP program that estimates π and contains a subtle race condition, and (2) an MPI-based 1d-wave simulator that fails to conform to a simple sequential implementation. Manchun Zheng, Michael S. Rogers, Ziqing Luo, Matthew B. Dwyer, Stephen F. Siegel |
ASE | 1 |
| 2015 | CIVL: the concurrency intermediate verification languageabstractThere are many ways to express parallel programs: message-passing libraries (MPI) and multithreading/GPU language extensions such as OpenMP, Pthreads, and CUDA, are but a few. This multitude creates a serious challenge for developers of software verification tools: it takes enormous effort to develop such tools, but each development effort typically targets one small part of the concurrency landscape, with little sharing of techniques and code among efforts. Stephen F. Siegel, Manchun Zheng, Ziqing Luo, Timothy K. Zirkel, Andre V. Marianiello, John G. Edenhofner, Matthew B. Dwyer, Michael S. Rogers |
SC | 2 |
| 2013 | Automatic Analysis of TiMo Systems in PATabstractTiMo is a process calculus for mobile systems where timers could be to used to control process mobility and interaction. Despite its syntactic simplicity, TiMo is able to describe complex systems. Interesting properties of such systems refers to process migration, time constraints, bounded liveness and optimal reachability. In this work we describe a tool, called TiMo@PAT, developed by using Process Analysis Toolkit (PAT), an extensible platform for model checkers. We illustrate the capability of TiMo@PAT by analyzing some properties of a distributed system. Gabriel Ciobanu, Manchun Zheng |
ICECCS | 2 |
| 2013 | USMMC: a self-contained model checker for UML state machinesabstractUML diagrams are gaining increasing usage in Object-Oriented system designs. UML state machines are specifically used in modeling dynamic behaviors of classes. It has been widely agreed that verification of system designs at an early stage will dramatically reduce the development cost. Tool support for verification UML designs can also encourage consistent usage of UML diagrams throughout the software development procedure. In this work, we present a tool, named USMMC, which turns model checking of UML state machines into practice. USMMC is a self-contained toolkit, which provides editing, interactive simulation as well as powerful model checking support for UML state machines. The evaluation results show the effectiveness and scalability of our tool. Shuang Liu 0007, Yang Liu 0003, Jun Sun 0001, Manchun Zheng, Bimlesh Wadhwa, Jin Song Dong 0001 |
ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE | 4 |
| 2013 | State Space Reduction for Sensor Networks Using Two-Level Partial Order Reduction
Manchun Zheng, David Sanán, Jun Sun 0001, Yang Liu 0003, Jin Song Dong 0001, Yu Gu 0001 |
VMCAI | 1 |
| 2012 | Formal modeling and validation of Stateflow diagrams
Chunqing Chen, Jun Sun 0001, Yang Liu 0003, Jin Song Dong 0001, Manchun Zheng |
Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf. | 5 |
| 2011 | Towards a Model Checker for NesC and Wireless Sensor Networks
Manchun Zheng, Jun Sun 0001, Yang Liu 0003, Jin Song Dong 0001, Yu Gu 0001 |
ICFEM | 1 |
| 2011 | Towards bug-free implementation for wireless sensor networksabstractIn this demonstration, a systematically domain-specific model checker, NesC@PAT, is presented. The tool takes NesC programs as input, and automatically verifies WSNs against properties specified in the form of deadlock freeness, state reachability or linear temporal logic formulas. We will show that NesC@PAT is able to find errors caused by rarely unexpected scenarios, which are difficult to be detected by general simulating or debugging. Manchun Zheng, Jun Sun 0001, David Sanán, Yang Liu 0003, Jin Song Dong 0001, Yu Gu 0001 |
SenSys | 1 |