Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Masayoshi Ejiri

dblp:92/2283 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 4 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Network optimization and economics · 77% Physical-layer communications · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Network optimization and economics › network design › network planning
transmission network planning
0.011978
Optical Fiber System Applications Aspects in Future NTT Networks · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1978
Physical-layer communications
digital transmission systems
0.011978
Optical Fiber System Applications Aspects in Future NTT Networks · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1978

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

demand forecasting · 0.0cost analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 Towards Management Requirements of Future Internet
Sung-Su Kim, Mi-Jung Choi, Hongtaek Ju 0001, Masayoshi Ejiri, James Won-Ki Hong
APNOMS4
2006 Paradigm Shift of Telecommunications Services and Management for NGN (Next Generation Networks)
Masayoshi Ejiri
EDOC1
2005 Service-level agreement - how to reach the practical agreement, not the announcement
Masayoshi Ejiri
Integrated Network Management1
1998 Simplifying the development of network management systems in a distributed environment
abstract
This paper presents Fujitsu's Common Foundation architecture. This architecture provides a unified approach that incorporates both network and element management. Although this architecture is based on the standard Telecommunication Management Network (TMN) concept, the Common Foundation takes that concept to a new level by addressing common issues inherent within the management of distributed systems. Thus, the Common Foundation addresses issues linked to security as well as to process, transaction, and association management. At the same time, the Common Foundation simplifies user tasks by providing a single interface into the entire network while maintaining the separation of functionality into multiple systems as defined by TMN.
Roger Fulton, Vikrama Ditya, Anuj Jain, Jeremy Lin, Misuhiro Azuma, Masayoshi Ejiri
NOMS6
1995 The paradigm shift in telecommunications services and networks
Masayoshi Ejiri
Integrated Network Management1
1994 For Whom The Advancing Service/network Management
Masayoshi Ejiri
NOMS1
1978 Optical Fiber System Applications Aspects in Future NTT Networks
abstract
This paper describes some aspects of optical fiber cable system applications in future NTT transmission networks, considering voice transmission as predominant even in future transmission networks in accordance with demand forecasts. The desirable optical fiber cable transmission system which should be developed and introduced is discussed taking into account optical fiber costs, demand estimates, pertinent technological developments, etc. It was concluded that the following process of introducing optical fiber cable transmission systems should be feasible. In the first step, approximately 32 Mbit/s and 100 Mbit/s digital transmission systems should be employed for short and medium haul trunks with heavy traffic using graded index optical fibers. A large capacity, long haul digital transmission system, such as a 400 Mbit/s system using graded index or, if possible, single mode optical fiber should be introduced next. The optical fiber cable costs at which fiber systems become economical, depend upon the application area. For short and medium haul systems, 40¢ per meter per core is required, but $2 per meter per core is sufficient for large capacity, long haul systems. For a short haul system operating at approximately 1.5 Mbits/s or 6 Mbits/s, the advantages of its introduction greatly depend on optical fiber costs which should be less than 20¢per meter per core.
Kunio Okura, Masayoshi Ejiri
IEEE Trans. Commun.2