Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Peter W. Kopke

dblp:92/2495 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1999
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 7

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
4 papers
Automata and formal languages · 37% Computational complexity · 26% Automated reasoning and model checking · 20%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Automata and formal languages › infinite-state systems
hybrid automata
0.021997
Discrete-Time Control for Rectangular Hybrid Automata · ICALP 1997
What's decidable about hybrid automata? · STOC 1995
Automata and formal languages
timed automata
0.021995
What's decidable about hybrid automata? · STOC 1995
The Expressive Power of Clocks · ICALP 1995
Computational complexity
decidability
0.011995
What's decidable about hybrid automata? · STOC 1995
Computational complexity › descriptive complexity
expressive power
0.011995
The Expressive Power of Clocks · ICALP 1995
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph classes
infinite graphs
0.011995
Computing Simulations on Finite and Infinite Graphs · FOCS 1995
Automated reasoning and model checking
reachability
0.011995
What's decidable about hybrid automata? · STOC 1995
Distributed computing theory
simulation relations
0.011995
Computing Simulations on Finite and Infinite Graphs · FOCS 1995
Computational complexity
undecidability
0.011995
What's decidable about hybrid automata? · STOC 1995

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

symbolic verification · 0.0symbolic similarity checking · 0.0refinement verification · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1999 Discrete-Time Control for Rectangular Hybrid Automata
Thomas A. Henzinger, Peter W. Kopke
Theor. Comput. Sci.2
1998 What's Decidable about Hybrid Automata?
abstract
Hybrid automata model systems with both digital and analog components, such as embedded control programs. Many verification tasks for such programs can be expressed as reachability problems for hybrid automata. By improving on previous decidability and undecidability results, we identify a boundary between decidability and undecidability for the reachability problem of hybrid automata. On the positive side, we give an (optimal) PSPACE reachability algorithm for the case of initialized rectangular automata, where all analog variables follow independent trajectories within piecewise-linear envelopes and are reinitialized whenever the envelope changes. Our algorithm is based on the construction of a timed automaton that contains all reachability information about a given initialized rectangular automaton. The translation has practical significance for verification, because it guarantees the termination of symbolic procedures for the reachability analysis of initialized rectangular automata. The translation also preserves theω-languages of initialized rectangular automata with bounded nondeterminism. On the negative side, we show that several slight generalizations of initialized rectangular automata lead to an undecidable reachability problem. In particular, we prove that the reachability problem is undecidable for timed automata augmented with a single stopwatch.
Thomas A. Henzinger, Peter W. Kopke, Anuj Puri, Pravin Varaiya
J. Comput. Syst. Sci.2
1997 Discrete-Time Control for Rectangular Hybrid Automata
Thomas A. Henzinger, Peter W. Kopke
ICALP2
1996 State Equivalences for Rectangular Hybrid Automata
Thomas A. Henzinger, Peter W. Kopke
CONCUR2
1995 Computing Simulations on Finite and Infinite Graphs
abstract
We present algorithms for computing similarity relations of labeled graphs. Similarity relations have applications for the refinement and verification of reactive systems. For finite graphs, we present an O(mn) algorithm for computing the similarity relation of a graph with n vertices and m edges (assuming m/spl ges/n). For effectively presented infinite graphs, we present a symbolic similarity-checking procedure that terminates if a finite similarity relation exists. We show that 2D rectangular automata, which model discrete reactive systems with continuous environments, define effectively presented infinite graphs with finite similarity relations. It follows that the refinement problem and the /spl forall/CTL* model-checking problem are decidable for 2D rectangular automata.
Monika Henzinger, Thomas A. Henzinger, Peter W. Kopke
FOCS3
1995 The Expressive Power of Clocks
Thomas A. Henzinger, Peter W. Kopke, Howard Wong-Toi
ICALP2
1995 What's decidable about hybrid automata?
abstract
Hybrid automata model systems with both digital and analog components, such az embedded control programs.Many verification tasks for such programs can be expressed as reachability problems for hybrid automata.By improving on previous decidability and undecidability results, we identify the precise boundary between decidability and undecidability of the reachability problem for hybrid automata.On the positive side, we give an (optimal) PSPACE reachability algorithm for the case of initialized rectangular automata, where all analog variables follow trajectories within piecewise-linear envelopes and are reinitialized whenever the envelope changes.Our algorithm is based on a translation of an initialized rectangular automaton into a timed automaton that defines the same timed language.The translation has practical significance for verification, because it guarantees the termination of symbolic procedures for the reachability analysis of initialized rectangular automata.On the negative side, we show that several slight generalizations of initialized rectangular automata lead to an undecidable reachability problem.In particular, we prove that the reachability problem is undecidable for timed automata with a single stopwatch.
Thomas A. Henzinger, Peter W. Kopke, Anuj Puri, Pravin Varaiya
STOC2