Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Feng Li 0031
dblp:92/2954-31
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0003-0469-0363ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Video understanding and tracking · 81% Image recognition and object detection · 19% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › object tracking › discriminative tracking
correlation filter tracking |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | Remove Cosine Window From Correlation Filter-Based Visual Trackers: When and How · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2020 Learning Spatial-Temporal Regularized Correlation Filters for Visual Tracking · CVPR 2018 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
object tracking |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | Remove Cosine Window From Correlation Filter-Based Visual Trackers: When and How · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2020 Learning Spatial-Temporal Regularized Correlation Filters for Visual Tracking · CVPR 2018 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection › oriented object detection
boundary discontinuity |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Remove Cosine Window From Correlation Filter-Based Visual Trackers: When and How · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2020 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
spatio-temporal regularization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Learning Spatial-Temporal Regularized Correlation Filters for Visual Tracking · CVPR 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
spatial regularization · 0.4mask function · 0.4discriminative correlation filter · 0.3alternating direction method of multipliers · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Remove Cosine Window From Correlation Filter-Based Visual Trackers: When and HowabstractCorrelation filters (CFs) have been continuously advancing the state-of-the-art tracking performance and have been extensively studied in the recent few years. Nonetheless, the existing CF trackers adopt a cosine window to spatially reweight base image to alleviate boundary discontinuity. However, cosine window emphasizes more on the central regions of base image and has the risk of contaminating negative training samples during model learning. On the other hand, spatial regularization deployed in many recent CF trackers plays a similar role as cosine window by enforcing spatial penalty on CF coefficients. Therefore, we in this paper investigate the feasibility to remove cosine window from CF trackers with spatial regularization. When simply removing cosine window, CF with spatial regularization still suffers from small degree of boundary discontinuity. To tackle this issue, binary and Gaussian shaped mask functions are further introduced for eliminating boundary discontinuity while reweighting the estimation error of each training sample, and can be incorporated with multiple CF trackers with spatial regularization. In comparison to the baseline methods with cosine window, our methods are effective in handling boundary discontinuity and sample contamination, thereby benefiting tracking performance. Extensive experiments on four benchmarks show that our methods perform favorably against the state-of-the-art trackers using either handcrafted or deep CNN features. Feng Li 0031, Xiaohe Wu, Wangmeng Zuo, David Zhang 0001, Lei Zhang 0006 |
IEEE Trans. Image Process. | 1 |
| 2018 | Learning Spatial-Temporal Regularized Correlation Filters for Visual TrackingabstractDiscriminative Correlation Filters (DCF) are efficient in visual tracking but suffer from unwanted boundary effects. Spatially Regularized DCF (SRDCF) has been suggested to resolve this issue by enforcing spatial penalty on DCF coefficients, which, inevitably, improves the tracking performance at the price of increasing complexity. To tackle online updating, SRDCF formulates its model on multiple training images, further adding difficulties in improving efficiency. In this work, by introducing temporal regularization to SRDCF with single sample, we present our spatialtemporal regularized correlation filters (STRCF). The STRCF formulation can not only serve as a reasonable approximation to SRDCF with multiple training samples, but also provide a more robust appearance model than SRDCF in the case of large appearance variations. Besides, it can be efficiently solved via the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM). By incorporating both temporal and spatial regularization, our STRCF can handle boundary effects without much loss in efficiency and achieve superior performance over SRDCF in terms of accuracy and speed. Compared with SRDCF, STRCF with hand-crafted features provides a 5× speedup and achieves a gain of 5.4% and 3.6% AUC score on OTB-2015 and Temple-Color, respectively. Moreover, STRCF with deep features also performs favorably against state-of-the-art trackers and achieves an AUC score of 68.3% on OTB-2015. Feng Li 0031, Wangmeng Zuo, Lei Zhang 0006, Ming-Hsuan Yang 0001 |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2016 | Structured detail enhancement for cross-modality face synthesis
Chunwei Song, Feng Li 0031, Yunqi Dang, Huijun Gao, Zifei Yan, Wangmeng Zuo |
Neurocomputing | 2 |