Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Quynh-Thu Le

dblp:92/3318 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-3682-1439ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Segmentation and scene understanding · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 67% Medical and health informatics · 33%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
medical image segmentation
0.712023
Adaptive Region-Specific Loss for Improved Medical Image Segmentation · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › medical image segmentation
multi-organ segmentation
0.712023
Adaptive Region-Specific Loss for Improved Medical Image Segmentation · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023
Medical and health informatics › oncology
cancer detection
0.012004
Sample classification from protein mass spectrometry, by 'peak probability contrasts' · Bioinform. 2004
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics
mass spectrometry proteomics
0.012004
Sample classification from protein mass spectrometry, by 'peak probability contrasts' · Bioinform. 2004
Bioinformatics and computational biology
proteomics
0.012004
Sample classification from protein mass spectrometry, by 'peak probability contrasts' · Bioinform. 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

deep learning · 0.7adaptive loss weighting · 0.7statistical classification · 0.0peak probability contrast · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Adaptive Region-Specific Loss for Improved Medical Image Segmentation
abstract
Defining the loss function is an important part of neural network design and critically determines the success of deep learning modeling. A significant shortcoming of the conventional loss functions is that they weight all regions in the input image volume equally, despite the fact that the system is known to be heterogeneous (i.e., some regions can achieve high prediction performance more easily than others). Here, we introduce a region-specific loss to lift the implicit assumption of homogeneous weighting for better learning. We divide the entire volume into multiple sub-regions, each with an individualized loss constructed for optimal local performance. Effectively, this scheme imposes higher weightings on the sub-regions that are more difficult to segment, and vice versa. Furthermore, the regional false positive and false negative errors are computed for each input image during a training step and the regional penalty is adjusted accordingly to enhance the overall accuracy of the prediction. Using different public and in-house medical image datasets, we demonstrate that the proposed regionally adaptive loss paradigm outperforms conventional methods in the multi-organ segmentations, without any modification to the neural network architecture or additional data preparation.
Lequan Yu, Jen-Yeu Wang, Neil Panjwani, Jean-Pierre Obeid, Wu Liu 0003, Lianli Liu, Nataliya Kovalchuk, Michael Gensheimer 0001, Lucas Kas Vitzthum, Beth M. Beadle, Daniel T. Chang, Quynh-Thu Le, Lei Xing 0001
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.13
2004 Sample classification from protein mass spectrometry, by 'peak probability contrasts'
abstract
MOTIVATION: Early cancer detection has always been a major research focus in solid tumor oncology. Early tumor detection can theoretically result in lower stage tumors, more treatable diseases and ultimately higher cure rates with less treatment-related morbidities. Protein mass spectrometry is a potentially powerful tool for early cancer detection. We propose a novel method for sample classification from protein mass spectrometry data. When applied to spectra from both diseased and healthy patients, the 'peak probability contrast' technique provides a list of all common peaks among the spectra, their statistical significance and their relative importance in discriminating between the two groups. We illustrate the method on matrix-assisted laser desorption and ionization mass spectrometry data from a study of ovarian cancers. RESULTS: Compared to other statistical approaches for class prediction, the peak probability contrast method performs as well or better than several methods that require the full spectra, rather than just labelled peaks. It is also much more interpretable biologically. The peak probability contrast method is a potentially useful tool for sample classification from protein mass spectrometry data.
Robert Tibshirani, Trevor J. Hastie, Balasubramanian Narasimhan, Scott G. Soltys, Gongyi Shi, Albert C. Koong, Quynh-Thu Le
Bioinform.7