Paul J. Jackson

dblp:92/3422 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Integrated circuit design · 26% Energy-efficient computing · 23% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 23%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
many-core architecture
0.312018
Power and Energy Characterization of an Open Source 25-Core Manycore Processor · HPCA 2018
Energy-efficient computing
power characterization
0.312018
Power and Energy Characterization of an Open Source 25-Core Manycore Processor · HPCA 2018
Performance modeling and evaluation
workload characterization
0.312018
Power and Energy Characterization of an Open Source 25-Core Manycore Processor · HPCA 2018
Integrated circuit design › semiconductor devices › organic electronics
organic thin-film transistor
0.312017
Architectural tradeoffs for biodegradable computing · MICRO 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.3measurement · 0.3architectural tradeoff analysis · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Power and Energy Characterization of an Open Source 25-Core Manycore Processor
abstract
The end of Dennard's scaling and the looming power wall have made power and energy primary design goals for modern processors. Further, new applications such as cloud computing and Internet of Things (IoT) continue to necessitate increased performance and energy efficiency. Manycore processors show potential in addressing some of these issues. However, there is little detailed power and energy data on manycore processors. In this work, we carefully study detailed power and energy characteristics of Piton, a 25-core modern open source academic processor, including voltage versus frequency scaling, energy per instruction (EPI), memory system energy, network-on-chip (NoC) energy, thermal characteristics, and application performance and power consumption. This is the first detailed power and energy characterization of an open source manycore design implemented in silicon. The open source nature of the processor provides increased value, enabling detailed characterization verified against simulation and the ability to correlate results with the design and register transfer level (RTL) model. Additionally, this enables other researchers to utilize this work to build new power models, devise new research directions, and perform accurate power and energy research using the open source processor. The characterization data reveals a number of interesting insights, including that operand values have a large impact on EPI, recomputing data can be more energy efficient than loading it from memory, on-chip data transmission (NoC) energy is low, and insights on energy efficient multithreaded core design. All data collected and the hardware infrastructure used is open source and available for download at http://www.openpiton.org.
Michael McKeown, Alexey Lavrov, Mohammad Shahrad, Paul J. Jackson, Yaosheng Fu, Jonathan Balkind, Tri Minh Nguyen 0003, Katie Lim, Yanqi Zhou, David Wentzlaff
HPCA4
2017 Architectural tradeoffs for biodegradable computing
abstract
Organic thin-film transistors (OTFTs) have attracted increased attention because of the possibility to produce environmentally friendly low-cost, lightweight, flexible, and even biodegradable devices. With an increasing number of complex applications being proposed for organic and biodegradable semiconductors, the need for computation horsepower also rises. However, due to the process characteristic differences, direct adaptation of silicon-based circuit designs and traditional computer architecture wisdom is not applicable.
Ting-Jung Chang, Zhuozhi Yao, Paul J. Jackson, Barry P. Rand, David Wentzlaff
MICRO3