Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jeffrey M. Trent

dblp:92/3927 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
0000-0003-0183-4202ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
microarray data analysis
0.122004
Which is better for cDNA-microarray-based classification: ratios or direct intensities · Bioinform. 2004
Ratio statistics of gene expression levels and applications to microarray data analysis · Bioinform. 2002
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › gene expression classification
microarray classification
0.012004
Which is better for cDNA-microarray-based classification: ratios or direct intensities · Bioinform. 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

model-based simulation · 0.0quality metric · 0.0hypothesis testing · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 The BioIntelligence Framework: a new computational platform for biomedical knowledge computing
abstract
Breakthroughs in molecular profiling technologies are enabling a new data-intensive approach to biomedical research, with the potential to revolutionize how we study, manage, and treat complex diseases. The next great challenge for clinical applications of these innovations will be to create scalable computational solutions for intelligently linking complex biomedical patient data to clinically actionable knowledge. Traditional database management systems (DBMS) are not well suited to representing complex syntactic and semantic relationships in unstructured biomedical information, introducing barriers to realizing such solutions. We propose a scalable computational framework for addressing this need, which leverages a hypergraph-based data model and query language that may be better suited for representing complex multi-lateral, multi-scalar, and multi-dimensional relationships. We also discuss how this framework can be used to create rapid learning knowledge base systems to intelligently capture and relate complex patient data to biomedical knowledge in order to automate the recovery of clinically actionable information.
Toni R. Farley, Jeff Kiefer, Preston Lee, Daniel Von Hoff, Jeffrey M. Trent, Charles J. Colbourn, Spyro Mousses
J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc.5
2009 Conditioning-Based Modeling of Contextual Genomic Regulation
abstract
A more complete understanding of the alterations in cellular regulatory and control mechanisms that occur in the various forms of cancer has been one of the central targets of the genomic and proteomic methods that allow surveys of the abundance and/or state of cellular macromolecules. This preference is driven both by the intractability of cancer to generic therapies, assumed to be due to the highly varied molecular etiologies observed in cancer, and by the opportunity to discern and dissect the regulatory and control interactions presented by the highly diverse assortment of perturbations of regulation and control that arise in cancer. Exploiting the opportunities for inference on the regulatory and control connections offered by these revealing system perturbations is fraught with the practical problems that arise from the way biological systems operate. Two classes of regulatory action in biological systems are particularly inimical to inference, convergent regulation, where a variety of regulatory actions result in a common set of control responses (crosstalk), and divergent regulation, where a single regulatory action produces entirely different sets of control responses, depending on cellular context (conditioning). We have constructed a coarse mathematical model of the propagation of regulatory influence in such distributed, context-sensitive regulatory networks that allows a quantitative estimation of the amount of crosstalk and conditioning associated with a candidate regulatory gene taken from a set of genes that have been profiled over a series of samples where the candidate's activity varies.
Edward R. Dougherty, Marcel Brun, Jeffrey M. Trent, Michael L. Bittner
IEEE ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform.3
2004 Which is better for cDNA-microarray-based classification: ratios or direct intensities
abstract
MOTIVATION: There are two general methods for making gene-expression microarrays: one is to hybridize a single test set of labeled targets to the probe, and measure the background-subtracted intensity at each probe site; the other is to hybridize both a test and a reference set of differentially labeled targets to a single detector array, and measure the ratio of the background-subtracted intensities at each probe site. Which method is better depends on the variability in the cell system and the random factors resulting from the microarray technology. It also depends on the purpose for which the microarray is being used. Classification is a fundamental application and it is the one considered here. RESULTS: This paper describes a model-based simulation paradigm that compares the classification accuracy provided by these methods over a variety of noise types and presents the results of a study modeled on noise typical of cDNA microarray data. The model consists of four parts: (1) the measurement equation for genes in the reference state; (2) the measurement equation for genes in the test state; (3) the ratio and normalization procedure for a dual-channel system; and (4) the intensity and normalization procedure for a single-channel system. In the reference state, the mean intensities are modeled as a shifted exponential distribution, and the intensity for a particular gene is modeled via a normal distribution, Normal(I, alphaI), about its mean intensity I, with alpha being the coefficient of variation of the cell system. In the test state, some genes have their intensities up-regulated by a random factor. The model includes a number of random factors affecting intensity measurement: deposition gain d, labeling gain, and post-image-processing residual noise. The key conclusion resulting from the study is that the coefficient of variation governing the randomness of the intensities and the deposition gain are the most important factors for determining whether a single-channel or dual-channel system provides superior classification, and the decision region in the alpha-d plane is approximately linear.
Sanju Attoor, Edward R. Dougherty, Yidong Chen 0002, Michael L. Bittner, Jeffrey M. Trent
Bioinform.5
2003 Efficient selection of feature sets possessing high coefficients of determination based on incremental determinations
Ronaldo Fumio Hashimoto, Edward R. Dougherty, Marcel Brun, Zheng-Zheng Zhou, Michael L. Bittner, Jeffrey M. Trent
Signal Process.6
2002 Ratio statistics of gene expression levels and applications to microarray data analysis
abstract
MOTIVATION: Expression-based analysis for large families of genes has recently become possible owing to the development of cDNA microarrays, which allow simultaneous measurement of transcript levels for thousands of genes. For each spot on a microarray, signals in two channels must be extracted from their backgrounds. This requires algorithms to extract signals arising from tagged mRNA hybridized to arrayed cDNA locations and algorithms to determine the significance of signal ratios. RESULTS: This paper focuses on estimation of signal ratios from the two channels, and the significance of those ratios. The key issue is the determination of whether a ratio is significantly high or low in order to conclude whether the gene is upregulated or downregulated. The paper builds on an earlier study that involved a hypothesis test based on a ratio statistic under the supposition that the measured fluorescent intensities subsequent to image processing can be assumed to reflect the signal intensities. Here, a refined hypothesis test is considered in which the measured intensities forming the ratio are assumed to be combinations of signal and background. The new method involves a signal-to-noise ratio, and for a high signal-to-noise ratio the new test reduces (with close approximation) to the original test. The effect of low signal-to-noise ratio on the ratio statistics constitutes the main theme of the paper. Finally, and in this vein, a quality metric is formulated for spots. This measure can be used to decide whether or not a spot ratio should be deleted, or to adjust various measurements to reflect confidence in the quality of the measurement. CONTACT: [email protected]
Yidong Chen 0002, Vishnu G. Kamat, Edward R. Dougherty, Michael L. Bittner, Paul S. Meltzer, Jeffrey M. Trent
Bioinform.6