EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Constantinos Maglaras
dblp:92/4070 · also Costis Maglaras
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0002-4283-2177ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 87% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 13% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Approximation and online algorithms · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-armed bandit |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Thompson Sampling with Information Relaxation Penalties · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
thompson sampling |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Thompson Sampling with Information Relaxation Penalties · NeurIPS 2019 |
Approximation and online algorithms › online learning
exploration-exploitation tradeoff |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Thompson Sampling with Information Relaxation Penalties · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
bayesian decision theory |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Thompson Sampling with Information Relaxation Penalties · NeurIPS 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
thompson sampling · 0.8performance bounds · 0.8information relaxation · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Thompson Sampling with Information Relaxation PenaltiesabstractWe consider a finite-horizon multi-armed bandit (MAB) problem in a Bayesian setting, for which we propose an information relaxation sampling framework. With this framework, we define an intuitive family of control policies that include Thompson sampling (TS) and the Bayesian optimal policy as endpoints. Analogous to TS, which, at each decision epoch pulls an arm that is best with respect to the randomly sampled parameters, our algorithms sample entire future reward realizations and take the corresponding best action. However, this is done in the presence of “penalties” that seek to compensate for the availability of future information. We develop several novel policies and performance bounds for MAB problems that vary in terms of improving performance and increasing computational complexity between the two endpoints. Our policies can be viewed as natural generalizations of TS that simultaneously incorporate knowledge of the time horizon and explicitly consider the exploration-exploitation trade-off. We prove associated structural results on performance bounds and suboptimality gaps. Numerical experiments suggest that this new class of policies perform well, in particular in settings where the finite time horizon introduces significant exploration-exploitation tension into the problem. Seungki Min, Constantinos Maglaras, Ciamac C. Moallemi |
NeurIPS | 2 |