Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Robert Hsieh
dblp:92/6602
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 4 · 3 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
3 papers |
Cellular and mobile networks · 56% Content delivery and video streaming · 21% Wireless networking · 13% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cellular and mobile networks › mobility management › Mobile IP
Mobile IP handoff |
0.1 | 2 | 2003 | A comparison of mechanisms for improving mobile IP handoff latency for end-to-end TCP · MobiCom 2003 S-MIP: A Seamless Handoff Architecture for Mobile IP · INFOCOM 2003 |
Cellular and mobile networks
mobility management |
0.1 | 2 | 2003 | A comparison of mechanisms for improving mobile IP handoff latency for end-to-end TCP · MobiCom 2003 S-MIP: A Seamless Handoff Architecture for Mobile IP · INFOCOM 2003 |
Content delivery and video streaming
video-on-demand |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | On-demand Video Streaming in Mobile Opportunistic Networks · PerCom 2008 |
Cellular and mobile networks › mobility management › handover
seamless handover |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | S-MIP: A Seamless Handoff Architecture for Mobile IP · INFOCOM 2003 |
Cellular and mobile networks › mobility management › handover
802.11 handoff |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | S-MIP: A Seamless Handoff Architecture for Mobile IP · INFOCOM 2003 |
Wireless networking
WLAN |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | S-MIP: A Seamless Handoff Architecture for Mobile IP · INFOCOM 2003 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation · 0.2prototype implementation · 0.1mathematical analysis · 0.0comparative evaluation · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Peer-assisted video on-demand streaming system in practical WiFi-based mobile opportunistic networks
Hayoung Yoon, Jongwon Kim 0001, Robert Hsieh |
J. Netw. Comput. Appl. | 3 |
| 2008 | On-demand Video Streaming in Mobile Opportunistic NetworksabstractProviding on-demand video streaming services to large numbers of nodes in mobile wireless networks is a challenging task. We propose MOVi (mobile opportunistic video-on-demand), a mobile peer-to-peer video-on-demand application based on ubiquitous WiFi enabled devices such as smartphones and Ultra Mobile PCs. MOVi poses new challenges in on-demand video streaming caused by limited wireless communication range, user mobility and variable user population density. MOVi addresses these challenges by exploiting the opportunistic mix use of downlink and direct peer-to-peer communication to significantly improve achievable overall system throughput. Through simulation and actual implementation, we observed that MOVi is able to increase the number of supported concurrent users two fold compared with unicast based on-demand video streaming, as well as reducing video start-up delay by half. Significantly, these performance improvements can be achieved without increasing power consumption at the end device. Using MOVi, users not only share and distribute on-demand video such as YouTube clips for their own performance gain but also for the benefit of the collaborative group. Hayoung Yoon, Jongwon Kim 0001, Feiselia Tan, Robert Hsieh |
PerCom | 4 |
| 2003 | S-MIP: A Seamless Handoff Architecture for Mobile IPabstractAs the number of Mobile IP (MIP) [C. Perkins, (1996)] users grow, so will the demand for delay sensitive real-time applications, such as audio streaming, that require seamless handoff, namely, a packet lossless Quality-of-Service guarantee during a handoff. Two well-known approaches in reducing the MIP handoff latency have been proposed in the literature. One aims to reduce the (home) network registration time through a hierarchical management structure, while the other tries to minimize the lengthy address resolution delay by address pre-configuration through what is known as the fast-handoff mechanism. We present a novel seamless handoff architecture, S-MIP, that builds on top of the hierarchical approach [H. Soliman et al. (2002)] and the fast-handoff mechanism [G. Dommety et al. (2002)], in conjunction with a newly developed handoff algorithm based on pure software-based movement tracking techniques [Z.-G. Zhou et al. (2002)]. Using a combination of simulation and mathematical analysis, we argue that our architecture is capable of providing packet lossless handoff with latency similar to that of L2 handoff delay when using the 802.11 access technology. More importantly, S-MIP has a signaling overhead equal to that of the well-known 'integrated' hierarchical MIP with fast-handoff scheme [H. Soliman et al. (2002)], within the portion of the network that uses wireless links. In relation to our S-MIP architecture, we discuss issues regarding the construction of network architecture, movement tracking, registration, address resolution, handoff algorithm and data handling. Robert Hsieh, Zhe Guang Zhou, Aruna Seneviratne |
INFOCOM | 1 |
| 2003 | A comparison of mechanisms for improving mobile IP handoff latency for end-to-end TCPabstractHandoff latency results in packet losses and severe End-to-End TCP performance degradation as TCP, perceiving these losses as congestion, causes source throttling or retransmission. In order to mitigate these effects, various Mobile IP(v6) extensions have been designed to augment the base Mobile IP with hierarchical registration management, address pre-fetching and local retransmission mechanisms. While these methods have reduced the impact of losses on TCP goodput and improved handoff latency, no comparative studies have been done regarding the relative performance amongst them. In this paper, we comprehensively evaluated the impact of layer-3 handoff latency on End-to-End TCP for various Mobile IP(v6) extensions. Five such frameworks are compared with the base Mobile IPv6 framework, namely, i) Hierarchical Mobile IPv6, ii) Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 with Fast-handover, iii) (Flat) Mobile IPv6 with Fast-handover, iv) Simultaneous Bindings, and v) Seamless handoff architecture for Mobile IP (S-MIP). We propose an evaluation model examining the effect of linear and ping-pong movement on handoff latency and TCP goodput, for all above frameworks. Our results show that S-MIP performs best under both ping-pong and linear movements during a handoff, with latency comparable to a layer-2 (access layer) handoff. All other frameworks suffer from packet losses and performance degradation of some sort. We also proposed an optimization for S-MIP which improves the performance by further eliminating the possibility of packets out of order, caused by the local packet forwarding mechanisms of S-MIP. Robert Hsieh, Aruna Seneviratne |
MobiCom | 1 |
| 2002 | Performance analysis on hierarchical Mobile IPv6 with fast-handoff over end-to-end TCPabstractMobile IPv4 has been considered as the de facto standard in providing Internet mobility. However, as the demand for wireless mobile devices capable of executing real-time applications increases, it is necessary to provide superior handoff latency and quality of service (QoS). Mobile IPv6 is designed to resolve these issues, and has numerous applicable optimization techniques. Two ways of reducing the handoff latency, in both IPv4 and IPv6, have been proposed in the literature. One aims to reduce the (home) network registration time while the other aims to reduce the lengthy address resolution time when in a visiting network. We present a performance analysis of the current IETF proposals, namely, the hierarchical Mobile IPv6 architecture and the fast-handoff mechanism. The former is aimed at reducing the registration time while the later in reducing the address resolution time. We show through simulation that managing the registration process in a hierarchical fashion greatly reduces the overall handoff latency. Comparatively, the fast-handoff mechanism is even more capable of reducing the handoff latency. The simple superimposition of these two frameworks produces the best overall handoff latency result. However, the overall improvement is not a simple aggregation of the individual handoff latency gains. In fact, we discovered some rather non-trivial traffic behavior when these two frameworks are combined. We identify the causes which hinder the handoff performance and hence devise a set of design guidelines to improve the handoff latency further. Robert Hsieh, Aruna Seneviratne, Hesham Soliman, Karim El-Malki |
GLOBECOM | 1 |