Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Vivek Sharma 0004
dblp:92/6723-4
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
0000-0002-8896-0254ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Embedded and real-time systems · 56% Energy-efficient computing · 38% Cloud and datacenter computing · 6% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Embedded and real-time systems
real-time scheduling |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | A Utilization Bound for Aperiodic Tasks and Priority Driven Scheduling · IEEE Trans. Computers 2004 |
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time scheduling
schedulability analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | A Utilization Bound for Aperiodic Tasks and Priority Driven Scheduling · IEEE Trans. Computers 2004 |
Energy-efficient computing › voltage scaling
dynamic voltage scaling |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Power-aware QoS Management in Web Servers · RTSS 2003 |
Energy-efficient computing
power management |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Power-aware QoS Management in Web Servers · RTSS 2003 |
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time scheduling
admission control |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | A Utilization Bound for Aperiodic Tasks and Priority Driven Scheduling · IEEE Trans. Computers 2004 |
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time scheduling
aperiodic task scheduling |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | A Utilization Bound for Aperiodic Tasks and Priority Driven Scheduling · IEEE Trans. Computers 2004 |
Cloud and datacenter computing › datacenter services › online service systems › internet services
web server |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Power-aware QoS Management in Web Servers · RTSS 2003 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
synthetic utilization · 0.0deadline-monotonic scheduling · 0.0EDF · 0.0schedulability bound · 0.0feedback control · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | A Utilization Bound for Aperiodic Tasks and Priority Driven SchedulingabstractReal-time scheduling theory offers constant-time schedulability tests for periodic and sporadic tasks based on utilization bounds. Unfortunately, the periodicity or the minimal interarrival-time assumptions underlying these bounds make them inapplicable to a vast range of aperiodic workloads such as those seen by network routers, Web servers, and event-driven systems. This paper makes several important contributions toward real-time scheduling theory and schedulability analysis. We derive the first known bound for schedulability of aperiodic tasks. The bound is based on a utilization-like metric we call synthetic utilization, which allows implementing constant-time schedulability tests at admission control time. We prove that the synthetic utilization bound for deadline-monotonic scheduling of aperiodic tasks is 1/1+/spl radic/1/2. We also show that no other time-independent scheduling policy can have a higher schedulability bound. Similarly, we show that EDF has a bound of 1 and that no dynamic-priority policy has a higher bound. We assess the performance of the derived bound and conclude that it is very efficient in hit-ratio maximization. Tarek F. Abdelzaher, Vivek Sharma 0004, Chenyang Lu 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Computers | 2 |
| 2003 | A Synthetic Utilization Bound for Aperiodic Tasks with Resource RequirementsabstractUtilization bounds for schedulability of aperiodic tasks are new in real-time scheduling literature. All aperiodic bounds known to date apply only to independent tasks. They either assume a liquid task model (one with infinitely many infinitesimal tasks) or are limited to deadline-monotonic and earliest-deadline first scheduling. In this paper, the authors make two important contributions. First, they derive the first aperiodic utilization bound that considers a task model with resource requirements. Second, the new bound is a function of a parameter called preemptable deadline ratio that depends on the scheduling policy. We show that many scheduling policies can be classified by this parameter allowing per-policy bounds to be derived. Simulation results demonstrating the applicability of aperiodic utilization bounds are presented. Tarek F. Abdelzaher, Vivek Sharma 0004 |
ECRTS | 2 |
| 2003 | Power-aware QoS Management in Web ServersabstractPower management in data centers has become an increasingly important concern. Large server installations are designed to handle peak load, which may be significantly larger than in off-peak conditions. The increasing cost of energy consumption and cooling incurred in farms of high-performance Web servers make low-power operation during off-peak hours desirable. This paper investigates adaptive algorithms for dynamic voltage scaling in QoS-enabled Web servers to minimize energy consumption subject to service delay constraints. We implement these algorithms inside the Linux kernel. The instrumented kernel supports multiple client classes with per-class deadlines. Energy consumption is minimized by using a feedback loop that regulates frequency and voltage levels to keep the synthetic utilization around the aperiodic schedulability bound derived in an earlier publication. Enforcing the bound ensures that deadlines are met. Our evaluation of an Apache server running on the modifier Linux kernel shows that non-trivial off-peak energy savings are possible without sacrificing timeliness. Vivek Sharma 0004, Arun Thomas, Tarek F. Abdelzaher, Kevin Skadron, Zhijian Lu |
RTSS | 1 |