Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zhepeng Yan

dblp:92/8164 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 6 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
4 papers
Data integration and cleaning · 40% Distributed and cloud data management · 27% Database system architecture and tuning · 27%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Cloud and datacenter computing · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Efficient and distributed learning · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed and cloud data management › federated database
federated query processing
0.312018
F1 Query: Declarative Querying at Scale · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2018
Data integration and cleaning › approximate matching
string similarity join
0.112010
Probabilistic string similarity joins · SIGMOD Conference 2010
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning
0.112015
Active learning in keyword search-based data integration · VLDB J. 2015
Database theory
probabilistic databases
0.012010
Probabilistic string similarity joins · SIGMOD Conference 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

declarative querying · 0.7SQL · 0.7active learning · 0.6uncertainty prediction · 0.2schema and record matching · 0.2pruning · 0.1edit distance · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 On Efficient Materialization in Data Lakes
Andrew Harn, Herald Kllapi, Zhepeng Yan
ICDE3
2018 F1 Query: Declarative Querying at Scale
abstract
F1 Query is a stand-alone, federated query processing platform that executes SQL queries against data stored in different file-based formats as well as different storage systems at Google (e.g., Bigtable, Spanner, Google Spreadsheets, etc.). F1 Query eliminates the need to maintain the traditional distinction between different types of data processing workloads by simultaneously supporting: (i) OLTP-style point queries that affect only a few records; (ii) low-latency OLAP querying of large amounts of data; and (iii) large ETL pipelines. F1 Query has also significantly reduced the need for developing hard-coded data processing pipelines by enabling declarative queries integrated with custom business logic. F1 Query satisfies key requirements that are highly desirable within Google: (i) it provides a unified view over data that is fragmented and distributed over multiple data sources; (ii) it leverages datacenter resources for performant query processing with high throughput and low latency; (iii) it provides high scalability for large data sizes by increasing computational parallelism; and (iv) it is extensible and uses innovative approaches to integrate complex business logic in declarative query processing. This paper presents the end-to-end design of F1 Query. Evolved out of F1, the distributed database originally built to manage Google's advertising data, F1 Query has been in production for multiple years at Google and serves the querying needs of a large number of users and systems.
Bart Samwel, John Cieslewicz, Ben Handy, Jason Govig, Petros Venetis, Chanjun Yang, Keith Peters, Jeff Shute, Daniel Tenedorio, Himani Apte, Felix Weigel, David Wilhite, Jiexing Li, Zhan Yuan, Craig Chasseur, Ian Rae, Anurag Biyani, Andrew Harn, Andrey Gubichev, Amr El-Helw, Orri Erling, Zhepeng Yan, Mohan Yang, Yiqun Wei, Thanh Do, Colin Zheng, Goetz Graefe, Somayeh Sardashti, Ahmed M. Aly, Divyakant Agrawal, Shivakumar Venkataraman
Proc. VLDB Endow.26
2015 Looking at Everything in Context
Zachary G. Ives, Zhepeng Yan, Brian Litt, Joost B. Wagenaar
CIDR2
2015 Active learning in keyword search-based data integration
Zhepeng Yan, Zachary G. Ives, Partha P. Talukdar, Cong Yu 0001
VLDB J.1
2013 Actively Soliciting Feedback for Query Answers in Keyword Search-Based Data Integration
abstract
The problem of scaling up data integration, such that new sources can be quickly utilized as they are discovered, remains elusive: global schemas for integrated data are difficult to develop and expand, and schema and record matching techniques are limited by the fact that data and metadata are often under-specified and must be disambiguated by data experts. One promising approach is to avoid using a global schema, and instead to develop keyword search-based data integration--where the system lazily discovers associations enabling it to join together matches to keywords, and return ranked results. The user is expected to understand the data domain and provide feedback about answers' quality. The system generalizes such feedback to learn how to correctly integrate data. A major open challenge is that under this model, the user only sees and offers feedback on a few "top- k " results: this result set must be carefully selected to include answers of high relevance and answers that are highly informative when feedback is given on them. Existing systems merely focus on predicting relevance, by composing the scores of various schema and record matching algorithms. In this paper we show how to predict the uncertainty associated with a query result's score, as well as how informative feedback is on a given result. We build upon these foundations to develop an active learning approach to keyword search-based data integration, and we validate the effectiveness of our solution over real data from several very different domains.
Zhepeng Yan, Zachary G. Ives, Partha P. Talukdar, Cong Yu 0001
Proc. VLDB Endow.1
2010 Probabilistic string similarity joins
abstract
Edit distance based string similarity join is a fundamental operator in string databases. Increasingly, many applications in data cleaning, data integration, and scientific computing have to deal with fuzzy information in string attributes. Despite the intensive efforts devoted in processing (deterministic) string joins and managing probabilistic data respectively, modeling and processing probabilistic strings is still a largely unexplored territory. This work studies the string join problem in probabilistic string databases, using the expected edit distance (EED) as the similarity measure. We first discuss two probabilistic string models to capture the fuzziness in string values in real-world applications. The string-level model is complete, but may be expensive to represent and process. The character-level model has a much more succinct representation when uncertainty in strings only exists at certain positions. Since computing the EED between two probabilistic strings is prohibitively expensive, we have designed efficient and effective pruning techniques that can be easily implemented in existing relational database engines for both models. Extensive experiments on real data have demonstrated order-of-magnitude improvements of our approaches over the baseline.
Jeffrey Jestes, Feifei Li 0001, Zhepeng Yan, Ke Yi 0001
SIGMOD Conference3