Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Julie Hussin
dblp:92/8245
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0003-4295-3339ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › functional genomics
functional similarity of genes |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | deepSimDEF: deep neural embeddings of gene products and gene ontology terms for functional analysis of genes · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › knowledge representation in biology › biomedical ontology
gene ontology |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | deepSimDEF: deep neural embeddings of gene products and gene ontology terms for functional analysis of genes · Bioinform. 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
low-dimensional embedding · 0.6deep neural embedding · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | deepSimDEF: deep neural embeddings of gene products and gene ontology terms for functional analysis of genesabstractMOTIVATION: There is a plethora of measures to evaluate functional similarity (FS) of genes based on their co-expression, protein-protein interactions and sequence similarity. These measures are typically derived from hand-engineered and application-specific metrics to quantify the degree of shared information between two genes using their Gene Ontology (GO) annotations. RESULTS: We introduce deepSimDEF, a deep learning method to automatically learn FS estimation of gene pairs given a set of genes and their GO annotations. deepSimDEF's key novelty is its ability to learn low-dimensional embedding vector representations of GO terms and gene products and then calculate FS using these learned vectors. We show that deepSimDEF can predict the FS of new genes using their annotations: it outperformed all other FS measures by >5-10% on yeast and human reference datasets on protein-protein interactions, gene co-expression and sequence homology tasks. Thus, deepSimDEF offers a powerful and adaptable deep neural architecture that can benefit a wide range of problems in genomics and proteomics, and its architecture is flexible enough to support its extension to any organism. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Source code and data are available at https://github.com/ahmadpgh/deepSimDEF. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Ahmad Pesaranghader, Stan Matwin, Marina Sokolova, Jean-Christophe Grenier, Robert G. Beiko, Julie Hussin |
Bioinform. | 6 |
| 2010 | Haplotype allelic classes for detecting ongoing positive selectionabstractBACKGROUND: Natural selection eliminates detrimental and favors advantageous phenotypes. This process leaves characteristic signatures in underlying genomic segments that can be recognized through deviations in allelic or haplotypic frequency spectra. To provide an identifiable signature of recent positive selection that can be detected by comparison with the background distribution, we introduced a new way of looking at genomic polymorphisms: haplotype allelic classes. RESULTS: The model combines segregating sites and haplotypic information in order to reveal useful data characteristics. We developed a summary statistic, Svd, to compare the distribution of the haplotypes carrying the selected allele with the distribution of the remaining ones. Coalescence simulations are used to study the distributions under standard population models assuming neutrality, demographic scenarios and selection models. To test, in practice, haplotype allelic class performance and the derived statistic in capturing deviation from neutrality due to positive selection, we analyzed haplotypic variation in detail in the locus of lactase persistence in the three HapMap Phase II populations. CONCLUSIONS: We showed that the Svd statistic is less sensitive than other tests to confounding factors such as demography or recombination. Our approach succeeds in identifying candidate loci, such as the lactase-persistence locus, as targets of strong positive selection and provides a new tool complementary to other tests to study natural selection in genomic data. Julie Hussin, Philippe Nadeau, Jean-François Lefebvre, Damian Labuda |
BMC Bioinform. | 1 |