Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

David Y. W. Park

dblp:93/1686 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Program verification · 80% Concurrent programming · 20%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Automated reasoning and model checking › model checking
software model checking
0.012002
CMC: A Pragmatic Approach to Model Checking Real Code · OSDI 2002
Program verification
model checking
0.012000
Java Model Checking · ASE 2000
Program verification › model checking
software model checking
0.012000
Java Model Checking · ASE 2000
Concurrent programming
concurrency bugs
0.012000
Java Model Checking · ASE 2000
Concurrent programming
deadlock detection
0.012000
Java Model Checking · ASE 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

symbolic analysis · 0.0model checking · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2002 CMC: A Pragmatic Approach to Model Checking Real Code
Madan Musuvathi, David Y. W. Park, Andy Chou, Dawson R. Engler, David L. Dill
OSDI2
2000 Java Model Checking
abstract
This paper presents initial results in model checking multi-threaded Java programs. Java programs are translated into the SAL (Symbolic Analysis Laboratory) intermediate language, which supports dynamic constructs such as object instantiations and thread call stacks. The SAL model checker then exhaustively checks the program description for deadlocks and assertion failures, using traditional model checking optimizations to curb the state explosion problem. Most of the advanced features of the Java language are modeled within our framework.
David Y. W. Park, Ulrich Stern, Jens Ulrik Skakkebæk, David L. Dill
ASE1