Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

John A. Muckstadt

dblp:93/1967 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1986
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Computational fabrication · 50% Geometric modeling and processing · 50%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Distributed systems · 61% Storage systems · 39%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data models and query languages · 33% Indexing and storage engines · 33% Database system architecture and tuning · 33%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Geometric modeling and processing › solid modeling
boundary representation
0.011986
Automatic generation of optimized 3-axis NC programs using boundary files · ICRA 1986
Computational fabrication
computer-aided manufacturing
0.011986
Automatic generation of optimized 3-axis NC programs using boundary files · ICRA 1986
Indexing and storage engines
batch update
0.011977
Optimal Policy for Batch Operations: Backup, Checkpointing, Reorganization, and Updating (Abstract) · SIGMOD Conference 1977
Data models and query languages › schema management
database restructuring
0.011977
Optimal Policy for Batch Operations: Backup, Checkpointing, Reorganization, and Updating (Abstract) · SIGMOD Conference 1977
Distributed systems › fault tolerance
checkpointing
0.011977
Optimal Policy for Batch Operations: Backup, Checkpointing, Reorganization, and Updating (Abstract) · SIGMOD Conference 1977
Storage systems
database backup
0.011977
Optimal Policy for Batch Operations: Backup, Checkpointing, Reorganization, and Updating (Abstract) · SIGMOD Conference 1977
Distributed systems › fault tolerance › checkpointing
optimal checkpoint placement
0.011977
Optimal Policy for Batch Operations: Backup, Checkpointing, Reorganization, and Updating (Abstract) · SIGMOD Conference 1977
Storage systems › data management
database reorganization
0.011977
Optimal Policy for Batch Operations: Backup, Checkpointing, Reorganization, and Updating · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1977

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

inventory model · 0.0renewal reward theorem · 0.0cutter path planning · 0.0APT code generation · 0.0renewal-reward theorem · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1986 Automatic generation of optimized 3-axis NC programs using boundary files
abstract
A method for automatic generation of optimized 3-axis nc programs for pocketing operations is described that relies on the use of boundary files for geometric and topological information about the workpiece. A boundary file of the part is first created by a solids modeller and then input to the system along with machining parameters. After the user indicates those areas of the part to be machined, a cutter path of minimum length is generated consisting of two cut-sequences: a rough-cut and a finishing-cut. To implement the procedure, an APT code generator has been developed and tested on several parts.
R. Ferstenberg, K. K. Wang, John A. Muckstadt
ICRA3
1977 Optimal Policy for Batch Operations: Backup, Checkpointing, Reorganization, and Updating (Abstract)
abstract
Many database maintenance operations are performed periodically in batches, even in real-time systems. The purpose of this paper is to present a general model for determining the optimal frequency of these batch operations. Specifically, optimal backup, checkpointing, batch updating, and reorganization policies are derived. The approach used exploits inventory parallels, by seeking the optimal number of items --- rather than a time interval --- to trigger a batch. The Renewal Reward Theorem is used to find the average long run costs for backup, recovery, and item storage, per unit time, which is then minimized to find the optimal backup policy. This approach permits far less restrictive assumptions about the update arrival process than did previous models, as well as inclusion of storage costs for the updates. The optimal checkpointing, batch updating, and reorganization policies are shown to be special cases of this optimal backup policy. The derivation of previous results as special cases of this model, and an example, demonstrate the generality of the methodology developed.
Guy M. Lohman, John A. Muckstadt
SIGMOD Conference2
1977 Optimal Policy for Batch Operations: Backup, Checkpointing, Reorganization, and Updating
abstract
Many database maintenance operations are performed periodically in batches, even in realtime systems. The purpose of this paper is to present a general model for determining the optimal frequency of these batch operations. Specifically, optimal backup, checkpointing, batch updating, and reorganization policies are derived. The approach used exploits inventory parallels by seeking the optimal number of items—rather than a time interval—to trigger a batch. The Renewal Reward Theorem is used to find the average long run costs for backup, recovery, and item storage, per unit time, which is then minimized to find the optimal backup policy. This approach permits far less restrictive assumptions about the update arrival process than did previous models, as well as inclusion of storage costs for the updates. The optimal checkpointing, batch updating, and reorganization policies are shown to be special cases of this optimal backup policy. The derivation of previous results as special cases of this model, and an example, demonstrate the generality of the methodology developed.
Guy M. Lohman, John A. Muckstadt
ACM Trans. Database Syst.2