Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Pavel Matula
dblp:93/2066
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0001-9797-4853ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 56% Medical and health informatics · 44% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › bioimage informatics
cell tracking |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | A benchmark for comparison of cell tracking algorithms · Bioinform. 2014 |
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging
medical image analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | A benchmark for comparison of cell tracking algorithms · Bioinform. 2014 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › bioimage informatics
cell segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | A benchmark for comparison of cell tracking algorithms · Bioinform. 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
performance evaluation · 0.2benchmarking · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Non-Rigid Contour-Based Registration of Cell Nuclei in 2-D Live Cell Microscopy Images Using a Dynamic Elasticity ModelabstractThe analysis of the pure motion of subnuclear structures without influence of the cell nucleus motion and deformation is essential in live cell imaging. In this paper, we propose a 2-D contour-based image registration approach for compensation of nucleus motion and deformation in fluorescence microscopy time-lapse sequences. The proposed approach extends our previous approach, which uses a static elasticity model to register cell images. Compared with that scheme, the new approach employs a dynamic elasticity model for the forward simulation of nucleus motion and deformation based on the motion of its contours. The contour matching process is embedded as a constraint into the system of equations describing the elastic behavior of the nucleus. This results in better performance in terms of the registration accuracy. Our approach was successfully applied to real live cell microscopy image sequences of different types of cells including image data that was specifically designed and acquired for evaluation of cell image registration methods. An experimental comparison with the existing contour-based registration methods and an intensity-based registration method has been performed. We also studied the dependence of the results on the choice of method parameters. Dmitry V. Sorokin, Igor Peterlík, Marco Tektonidis, Karl Rohr, Pavel Matula |
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging | 5 |
| 2014 | A benchmark for comparison of cell tracking algorithmsabstractMOTIVATION: Automatic tracking of cells in multidimensional time-lapse fluorescence microscopy is an important task in many biomedical applications. A novel framework for objective evaluation of cell tracking algorithms has been established under the auspices of the IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging 2013 Cell Tracking Challenge. In this article, we present the logistics, datasets, methods and results of the challenge and lay down the principles for future uses of this benchmark. RESULTS: The main contributions of the challenge include the creation of a comprehensive video dataset repository and the definition of objective measures for comparison and ranking of the algorithms. With this benchmark, six algorithms covering a variety of segmentation and tracking paradigms have been compared and ranked based on their performance on both synthetic and real datasets. Given the diversity of the datasets, we do not declare a single winner of the challenge. Instead, we present and discuss the results for each individual dataset separately. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The challenge Web site (http://www.codesolorzano.com/celltrackingchallenge) provides access to the training and competition datasets, along with the ground truth of the training videos. It also provides access to Windows and Linux executable files of the evaluation software and most of the algorithms that competed in the challenge. Martin Maska, Vladimír Ulman, David Svoboda, Pavel Matula, Petr Matula, Cristina Ederra, Ainhoa Urbiola, Tomás España, Subramanian Venkatesan 0001, Deepak M. W. Balak, Pavel Karas, Tereza Bolcková, Markéta Streitová, Craig Carthel, Stefano Coraluppi, Nathalie Harder, Karl Rohr, Klas E. G. Magnusson, Joakim Jaldén, Helen M. Blau, Oleh Dzyubachyk, Pavel Krízek, Guy M. Hagen, David Pastor-Escuredo, Daniel Jimenez-Carretero, María J. Ledesma-Carbayo, Arrate Muñoz-Barrutia, Erik Meijering, Michal Kozubek 0001, Carlos Ortiz-de-Solorzano |
Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2012 | Smooth Chan-Vese segmentation via graph cuts
Ondrej Danek, Pavel Matula, Martin Maska, Michal Kozubek 0001 |
Pattern Recognit. Lett. | 2 |
| 2009 | A Fast Level Set-Like Algorithm with Topology Preserving Constraint
Martin Maska, Pavel Matula |
CAIP | 2 |