EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ira Rosen
dblp:93/2389
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 3Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Compilers and program optimization · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Compilers and program optimization › vectorization
SIMD vectorization |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Auto-vectorization of interleaved data for SIMD · PLDI 2006 |
Compilers and program optimization
vectorization |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Auto-vectorization of interleaved data for SIMD · PLDI 2006 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
SIMD |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | Auto-vectorization of interleaved data for SIMD · PLDI 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
vectorization · 0.1data reorganization · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | Vapor SIMD: Auto-vectorize once, run everywhereabstractJust-in-Time (JIT) compiler technology offers portability while facilitating target- and context-specific specialization. Single-Instruction-Multiple-Data (SIMD) hardware is ubiquitous and markedly diverse, but can be difficult for JIT compilers to efficiently target due to resource and budget constraints. We present our design for a synergistic auto-vectorizing compilation scheme. The scheme is composed of an aggressive, generic offline stage coupled with a lightweight, target-specific online stage. Our method leverages the optimized intermediate results provided by the first stage across disparate SIMD architectures from different vendors, having distinct characteristics ranging from different vector sizes, memory alignment and access constraints, to special computational idioms. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our design using a set of kernels that exercise innermost loop, outer loop, as well as straight-line code vectorization, all automatically extracted by the common offline compilation stage. This results in performance comparable to that provided by specialized monolithic offline compilers. Our framework is implemented using open-source tools and standards, thereby promoting interoperability and extendibility. Dorit Nuzman, Sergei Dyshel, Erven Rohou, Ira Rosen, Kevin Williams 0001, David Yuste, Albert Cohen 0001, Ayal Zaks |
CGO | 4 |
| 2011 | Speculatively vectorized bytecodeabstractDiversity is a confirmed trend of computing systems, which present a complex and moving target to software developers. Virtual machines and just-in-time compilers have been proposed to mitigate the complexity of these systems. They do so by offering a single and stable abstract machine model thereby hiding architectural details from programmers. Erven Rohou, Sergei Dyshel, Dorit Nuzman, Ira Rosen, Kevin Williams 0001, Albert Cohen 0001, Ayal Zaks |
HiPEAC | 4 |
| 2009 | Polyhedral-Model Guided Loop-Nest Auto-VectorizationabstractOptimizing compilers apply numerous interdependent optimizations, leading to the notoriously difficult phase-ordering problem - that of deciding which transformations to apply and in which order. Fortunately, new infrastructures such as the polyhedral compilation framework host a variety of transformations, facilitating the efficient exploration and configuration of multiple transformation sequences. Many powerful optimizations, however, remain external to the polyhedral framework, including vectorization. The low-level, target-specific aspects of vectorization for fine-grain SIMD has so far excluded it from being part of the polyhedral framework. In this paper we examine the interactions between loop transformations of the polyhedral framework and subsequent vectorization. We model the performance impact of the different loop transformations and vectorization strategies, and then show how this cost model can be integrated seamlessly into the polyhedral representation. This predictive modelling facilitates efficient exploration and educated decision making to best apply various polyhedral loop transformations while considering the subsequent effects of different vectorization schemes. Our work demonstrates the feasibility and benefit of tuning the polyhedral model in the context of vectorization. Experimental results confirm that our model has accurate predictions, providing speedups of over 2.0times on average over traditional innermost-loop vectorization on PowerPC970 and Cell-SPU SIMD platforms. Konrad Trifunovic, Dorit Nuzman, Albert Cohen 0001, Ayal Zaks, Ira Rosen |
PACT | 5 |
| 2006 | Auto-vectorization of interleaved data for SIMDabstractMost implementations of the Single Instruction Multiple Data (SIMD) model available today require that data elements be packed in vector registers. Operations on disjoint vector elements are not supported directly and require explicit data reorganization manipulations. Computations on non-contiguous and especially interleaved data appear in important applications, which can greatly benefit from SIMD instructions once the data is reorganized properly. Vectorizing such computations efficiently is therefore an ambitious challenge for both programmers and vectorizing compilers. We demonstrate an automatic compilation scheme that supports effective vectorization in the presence of interleaved data with constant strides that are powers of 2, facilitating data reorganization. We demonstrate how our vectorization scheme applies to dominant SIMD architectures, and present experimental results on a wide range of key kernels, showing speedups in execution time up to 3.7 for interleaving levels (stride) as high as 8. Dorit Nuzman, Ira Rosen, Ayal Zaks |
PLDI | 2 |