Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

M. Tsai

dblp:93/5544 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1999
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 56% Integrated circuit design · 44%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Robot manipulation · 50% 3D vision · 25% Motion planning and robot control · 25%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Integrated circuit design
analog and mixed-signal circuits
0.011999
The Simulation and Design of Integrated Inductors · DAC 1999
Electronic design automation
circuit simulation
0.011999
The Simulation and Design of Integrated Inductors · DAC 1999
Computer vision › 3D vision
geometric optimization
0.011985
Geometric optimization of manipulator structures for working volume and dexterity · ICRA 1985
Robotics › Robot manipulation › robot design
manipulator design
0.011985
Geometric optimization of manipulator structures for working volume and dexterity · ICRA 1985
Robotics › Robot manipulation
manipulator kinematics
0.011985
Geometric optimization of manipulator structures for working volume and dexterity · ICRA 1985
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
workspace analysis
0.011985
Geometric optimization of manipulator structures for working volume and dexterity · ICRA 1985

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

method of moments · 0.0greenhouse method · 0.0grashof's theorem · 0.0geometric optimization · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1999 The Simulation and Design of Integrated Inductors
abstract
At present there are two common types of integrated circuit inductor simulation tools.The first type is based on the Greenhouse methods [1], and obtains a solution in a fraction of a second; however, because it does not use solutions of the inductor charge and current distributions, it has limited accuracy.The second type, method of moments (MoM) solvers, determines the charge and current variations by decomposing the inductor into thousands of sub elements and solving a matrix.However, this process takes between minutes and hours to obtain a reasonably accurate solution.In this paper, we present a series of algorithms for solving inductors, of radius small compared to the wave length of the electrical signal, that equal or exceed the accuracy of MoM solvers, but obtain those solutions in roughly 1 second.( ) [ ] r O 1 and will complicate the accurate evaluation DAC 99, New Orleans, Louisiana: (c) 1999 ACM 1-58113-109-7/99/06..$5.00
N. R. Belk, Michel R. Frei, M. Tsai, Andrew J. Becker, K. L. Tokuda
DAC3
1985 Geometric optimization of manipulator structures for working volume and dexterity
abstract
Broadly speaking, the regional structure of a manipulator, which consists of the inboard three joints and the members associated with them, determines the workspace shape and volume. The orientation structure, which, for a six degree of freedom manipulator, consists of the three furthest outboard joints and members, determines the geometric dexterity or orientation potential of the manipulator. It is possible, using straightforward geometric arguments, to determine the optimal dimensions of the regional structure for a given total length. By the use of the spherical counterpart of Grashof's theorem formulated by Freudenstein, it is possible also to show that there is an optimum geometry of the orientation structure.
R. Vijaykumar, M. Tsai, Kenneth J. Waldron
ICRA2