Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Anbupalam Thalamuthu
dblp:93/6368
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
0000-0002-7114-1260ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › copy number analysis
copy number variation detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Multi-platform segmentation for joint detection of copy number variants · Bioinform. 2011 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Multi-platform segmentation for joint detection of copy number variants · Bioinform. 2011 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
clustering validation |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Evaluation and comparison of gene clustering methods in microarray analysis · Bioinform. 2006 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
gene clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Evaluation and comparison of gene clustering methods in microarray analysis · Bioinform. 2006 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Evaluation and comparison of gene clustering methods in microarray analysis · Bioinform. 2006 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
model-based clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Evaluation and comparison of gene clustering methods in microarray analysis · Bioinform. 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
robust smooth segmentation · 0.1correlated random-effect model · 0.1weighted rand index · 0.1tight clustering · 0.1k-means · 0.1hierarchical clustering · 0.1SOM · 0.1PAM · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | A method to incorporate prior information into score test for genetic association studiesabstractBACKGROUND: The interest of the scientific community in investigating the impact of rare variants on complex traits has stimulated the development of novel statistical methodologies for association studies. The fact that many of the recently proposed methods for association studies suffer from low power to identify a genetic association motivates the incorporation of prior knowledge into statistical tests. RESULTS: In this article we propose a methodology to incorporate prior information into the region-based score test. Within our framework prior information is used to partition variants within a region into several groups, following which asymptotically independent group statistics are constructed and then combined into a global test statistic. Under the null hypothesis the distribution of our test statistic has lower degrees of freedom compared with those of the region-based score statistic. Theoretical power comparison, population genetics simulations and results from analysis of the GAW17 sequencing data set suggest that under some scenarios our method may perform as well as or outperform the score test and other competing methods. CONCLUSIONS: An approach which uses prior information to improve the power of the region-based score test is proposed. Theoretical power comparison, population genetics simulations and the results of GAW17 data analysis showed that for some scenarios power of our method is on the level with or higher than those of the score test and other methods. Sergii Zakharov, Garrett H. K. Teoh, Agus Salim, Anbupalam Thalamuthu |
BMC Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2011 | Multi-platform segmentation for joint detection of copy number variantsabstractMOTIVATION: With the expansion of whole-genome studies, there is rapid evolution of genotyping platforms. This leads to practical issues such as upgrading of genotyping equipment which often results in research groups having data from different platforms for the same samples. While having more data can potentially yield more accurate copy-number estimates, combining such data is not straightforward as different platforms show different degrees of attenuation of the true copy-number or different noise characteristics and marker panels. Currently, there is still a relative lack of procedures for combining information from different platforms. RESULTS: We develop a method, called MPSS, based on a correlated random-effect model for the unobserved patterns and extend the robust smooth segmentation approach to the multiple-platform scenario. We also propose an objective criterion for discrete segmentation required for downstream analyses. For each identified segment, the software reports a P-value to indicate the likelihood of the segment being a true CNV. From the analyses of real and simulated data, we show that MPSS has better operating characteristics when compared to single-platform methods, and have substantially higher sensitivity compared to an existing multiplatform method. AVAILABILITY: The methods are implemented in an R package MPSS, and the source is available from http://www.meb.ki.se/~yudpaw. Teo Shu Mei, Yudi Pawitan, Vikrant Kumar, Anbupalam Thalamuthu, Mark Seielstad, Kee Seng Chia, Agus Salim |
Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2011 | Pathway-based analysis using reduced gene subsets in genome-wide association studiesabstractBACKGROUND: Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) analysis only captures a small proportion of associated genetic variants in Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) partly due to small marginal effects. Pathway level analysis incorporating prior biological information offers another way to analyze GWAS's of complex diseases, and promises to reveal the mechanisms leading to complex diseases. Biologically defined pathways are typically comprised of numerous genes. If only a subset of genes in the pathways is associated with disease then a joint analysis including all individual genes would result in a loss of power. To address this issue, we propose a pathway-based method that allows us to test for joint effects by using a pre-selected gene subset. In the proposed approach, each gene is considered as the basic unit, which reduces the number of genetic variants considered and hence reduces the degrees of freedom in the joint analysis. The proposed approach also can be used to investigate the joint effect of several genes in a candidate gene study. RESULTS: We applied this new method to a published GWAS of psoriasis and identified 6 biologically plausible pathways, after adjustment for multiple testing. The pathways identified in our analysis overlap with those reported in previous studies. Further, using simulations across a range of gene numbers and effect sizes, we demonstrate that the proposed approach enjoys higher power than several other approaches to detect associated pathways. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed method could increase the power to discover susceptibility pathways and to identify associated genes using GWAS. In our analysis of genome-wide psoriasis data, we have identified a number of relevant pathways for psoriasis. Simone Gupta, Mark Seielstad, Anbupalam Thalamuthu |
BMC Bioinform. | 5 |
| 2006 | Evaluation and comparison of gene clustering methods in microarray analysisabstractMOTIVATION: Microarray technology has been widely applied in biological and clinical studies for simultaneous monitoring of gene expression in thousands of genes. Gene clustering analysis is found useful for discovering groups of correlated genes potentially co-regulated or associated to the disease or conditions under investigation. Many clustering methods including hierarchical clustering, K-means, PAM, SOM, mixture model-based clustering and tight clustering have been widely used in the literature. Yet no comprehensive comparative study has been performed to evaluate the effectiveness of these methods. RESULTS: In this paper, six gene clustering methods are evaluated by simulated data from a hierarchical log-normal model with various degrees of perturbation as well as four real datasets. A weighted Rand index is proposed for measuring similarity of two clustering results with possible scattered genes (i.e. a set of noise genes not being clustered). Performance of the methods in the real data is assessed by a predictive accuracy analysis through verified gene annotations. Our results show that tight clustering and model-based clustering consistently outperform other clustering methods both in simulated and real data while hierarchical clustering and SOM perform among the worst. Our analysis provides deep insight to the complicated gene clustering problem of expression profile and serves as a practical guideline for routine microarray cluster analysis. Anbupalam Thalamuthu, Indranil Mukhopadhyay, Xiaojing Zheng, George C. Tseng |
Bioinform. | 1 |