Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Gene Ott

dblp:93/6655 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1971
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Automata and formal languages · 52% Coding theory · 32% Computational complexity · 16%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Automata and formal languages › regular languages
regular expressions
0.021971
Ambiguity in Graphs and Expressions · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971
Design of Sequential Machines from Their Regular Expressions · J. ACM 1961
Coding theory › source coding › source modeling
markov sources
0.011967
Compact encoding of stationary Markov sources · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1967
Coding theory
source coding
0.011967
Compact encoding of stationary Markov sources · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1967
Computational complexity › descriptive complexity
succinctness
0.011967
Compact encoding of stationary Markov sources · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1967
Automata and formal languages › finite automata
deterministic automata
0.011971
Ambiguity in Graphs and Expressions · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971
Automata and formal languages
signal-flow graphs
0.011971
Ambiguity in Graphs and Expressions · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

uniquely decodable codes · 0.0state diagram conversion · 0.0regular expression to machine conversion · 0.0nondeterministic automaton construction · 0.0ensemble average length minimization · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1971 Ambiguity in Graphs and Expressions
abstract
A regular expression is called unambiguous if every tape in the event can be generated from the expression in one way only. The flow-graph technique for constructing an expression is shown to preserve ambiguities of the graph, and thus, if the graph is that of a deterministic automaton, the expression is unambiguous. A procedure for generating a nondeterministic automaton which preserves the ambiguities of the given regular expression is described. Finally, a procedure for testing whether a given expression is ambiguous is given.
Ronald V. Book, Shimon Even, Sheila A. Greibach, Gene Ott
IEEE Trans. Computers4
1967 Compact encoding of stationary Markov sources
abstract
We treat the problem of encoding the outputs from a controllable rate source whose output statistics can be accurately described as a stationary finite-state Markov process. The class of encoding schemes considered is restricted to those in which each output from the source is encoded as a separate, uniquely decodable codeword. We present a uniquely decodable scheme in this class which minimizes the ensemble average length of the transmitted message corresponding to any number of outputs from the source, i.e., a compact encoding scheme. The code used will vary with time as a function of the entire past history of the source. The future encoding of the outputs from a sample source with any given past history will be compact also. Although the efficiency of the encoding scheme can be improved by enlarging the class of schemes considered, e.g., by applying the technique presented herein to higher order extensions of the source, this topic is not pursued.
Gene Ott
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1
1961 Design of Sequential Machines from Their Regular Expressions
abstract
Procedures are given to convert any regular expression into a state diagram description and neural net realization of a machine that recognizes the regular set of sequences described by the given expression. It is established that any regular expression with a finite number of connectives describes a regular set of sequences that can be recognized by a finite state machine. All the procedures given are guaranteed to terminate in a finite number of steps, and a generalized computer program can be written to handle the entire conversion. An incidental result of the theory is the design of multiple output sequential machines. The potential usefulness of regular expressions and a long neglected form of a state diagram are demonstrated.
Gene Ott, Neil H. Feinstein
J. ACM1