Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Joshua S. Bloom
dblp:93/7068
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-7777-216XORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video coding · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Computational science and engineering · 82% Bioinformatics and computational biology · 18% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Image and video coding
lossless compression |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | AstroCompress: A benchmark dataset for multi-purpose compression of astronomical data · ICLR 2025 |
Image and video coding
neural compression |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | AstroCompress: A benchmark dataset for multi-purpose compression of astronomical data · ICLR 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence alignment
maximal exact match |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | A practical algorithm for finding maximal exact matches in large sequence datasets using sparse suffix arrays · Bioinform. 2009 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
sequence analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | A practical algorithm for finding maximal exact matches in large sequence datasets using sparse suffix arrays · Bioinform. 2009 |
Algorithms and data structures › sequence algorithms › string algorithms
string indexing |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | A practical algorithm for finding maximal exact matches in large sequence datasets using sparse suffix arrays · Bioinform. 2009 |
Algorithms and data structures › sequence algorithms › string algorithms › string indexing
suffix array |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | A practical algorithm for finding maximal exact matches in large sequence datasets using sparse suffix arrays · Bioinform. 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
neural compression · 1.7lossless compression · 1.7sparse suffix array · 0.2partial matching · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | AstroCompress: A benchmark dataset for multi-purpose compression of astronomical dataabstractThe site conditions that make astronomical observatories in space and on the ground so desirable---cold and dark---demand a physical remoteness that leads to limited data transmission capabilities. Such transmission limitations directly bottleneck the amount of data acquired and in an era of costly modern observatories, any improvements in lossless data compression has the potential scale to billions of dollars worth of additional science that can be accomplished on the same instrument. Traditional lossless methods for compressing astrophysical data are manually designed. Neural data compression, on the other hand, holds the promise of learning compression algorithms end-to-end from data and outperforming classical techniques by leveraging the unique spatial, temporal, and wavelength structures of astronomical images. This paper introduces [AstroCompress](https://huggingface.co/AstroCompress): a neural compression challenge for astrophysics data, featuring four new datasets (and one legacy dataset) with 16-bit unsigned integer imaging data in various modes: space-based, ground-based, multi-wavelength, and time-series imaging. We provide code to easily access the data and benchmark seven lossless compression methods (three neural and four non-neural, including all practical state-of-the-art algorithms).
Our results on lossless compression indicate that lossless neural compression techniques can enhance data collection at observatories, and provide guidance on the adoption of neural compression in scientific applications. Though the scope of this paper is restricted to lossless compression, we also comment on the potential exploration of lossy compression methods in future studies. Tuan Truong, Rithwik Sudharsan, Peter Xiangyuan Ma, Ruihan Yang, Stephan Mandt, Joshua S. Bloom |
ICLR | 7 |
| 2014 | Astrophysical Applications of Machine Learning at Scale and under DuressabstractSummary form only given: The universe is teeming with change on timescales from billions of years to milliseconds. A major goal of modern synoptic imaging surveys is to categorize this change over the entire sky to infer the diverse physical origins of variability. However, event discovery is only the beginning in the quest to extract the deepest insights: expensive follow-up resources (telescopes and people) are required, often in a time constrained environment. Viewing discovery and scientific insight through a resource-maximization lens, I discuss how machine learning is being applied to some modern astrophysics challenges. Here, the surfacing of parallelized feature engineering and machine learning into production-quality (scalable and fault tolerant) frameworks is the frontier for our field. Joshua S. Bloom |
IPDPS | 1 |
| 2009 | A practical algorithm for finding maximal exact matches in large sequence datasets using sparse suffix arraysabstractMOTIVATION: High-throughput sequencing technologies place ever increasing demands on existing algorithms for sequence analysis. Algorithms for computing maximal exact matches (MEMs) between sequences appear in two contexts where high-throughput sequencing will vastly increase the volume of sequence data: (i) seeding alignments of high-throughput reads for genome assembly and (ii) designating anchor points for genome-genome comparisons. RESULTS: We introduce a new algorithm for finding MEMs. The algorithm leverages a sparse suffix array (SA), a text index that stores every K-th position of the text. In contrast to a full text index that stores every position of the text, a sparse SA occupies much less memory. Even though we use a sparse index, the output of our algorithm is the same as a full text index algorithm as long as the space between the indexed suffixes is not greater than a minimum length of a MEM. By relying on partial matches and additional text scanning between indexed positions, the algorithm trades memory for extra computation. The reduced memory usage makes it possible to determine MEMs between significantly longer sequences. AVAILABILITY: Source code for the algorithm is available under a BSD open source license at http://compbio.cs.princeton.edu/mems. The implementation can serve as a drop-in replacement for the MEMs algorithm in MUMmer 3. Zia Khan, Joshua S. Bloom, Leonid Kruglyak, Mona Singh 0001 |
Bioinform. | 2 |