Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Benjamin Koehne
dblp:93/7186
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers |
Collaborative and social computing · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Empirical software engineering › developer studies
global software development |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Globally distributed system developers: their trust expectations and processes · CSCW 2013 |
Collaborative and social computing
remote work |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Remote and alone: coping with being the remote member on the team · CSCW 2012 |
Collaborative and social computing
computer-supported cooperative work |
0.1 | 2 | 2013 | Globally distributed system developers: their trust expectations and processes · CSCW 2013 Remote and alone: coping with being the remote member on the team · CSCW 2012 |
Collaborative and social computing › computer-supported cooperative work
distributed collaboration |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | Globally distributed system developers: their trust expectations and processes · CSCW 2013 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
thematic analysis · 0.3qualitative interview study · 0.3interview study · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | Globally distributed system developers: their trust expectations and processesabstractTrust remains a challenge in globally distributed development teams. In order to investigate how trust plays out in this context, we conducted a qualitative study of 5 multi-national IT organizations. We interviewed 58 individuals across 10 countries and made two principal findings. First, study participants described trust in terms of their expectations of their colleagues. These expectations fell into one of three dimensions: that socially correct behavior will persist, that team members possess technical competency, and that individuals will demonstrate concern for others. Second, our study participants described trust as a dynamic process, with phases including formation, dissolution, adjustment and restoration. We provide new insights into these dimensions and phases of trust within distributed teams which extend existing literature. Our study also provides guidelines on effective practices within distributed teams in addition to providing implications for the extension of software engineering and collaboration tools. Ban Al-Ani, Matthew J. Bietz, Yi Wang 0013, Erik H. Trainer, Benjamin Koehne, Sabrina Marczak, David F. Redmiles, Rafael Prikladnicki |
CSCW | 5 |
| 2012 | Remote and alone: coping with being the remote member on the teamabstractGeographically distributed work has become a popular way to work. Past CSCW research has shown that remote workers rely on innovative communication platforms but still face challenges being remote. Research has also provided organizational and managerial strategies to bridge the distance gap. Our study in contrast investigates how individuals develop strategies to cope with the daily challenges of working remotely and alone, and what managers can do to help them. We interviewed seventeen individuals involved in remote work about their experiences, identifying unique challenges and their workarounds. Our interview results suggest that, although people may work alone, the process of conducting distributed work is actually very social. Individual remote workers establish a unique kind of work rhythm, visibility management for evaluation, social support infrastructure, and personal connection as a part of their coping strategies to balance their professional and personal lives. Benjamin Koehne, Patrick C. Shih, Judith S. Olson |
CSCW | 1 |